Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Database & SysAdmin
  3. Database
  4. check the key value before inserting data [modified]---ALREADY SOLVED---

check the key value before inserting data [modified]---ALREADY SOLVED---

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Database
databasehelptutorialquestion
21 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mycroft Holmes

    I dislike using these, they tempt the developer into programming by error, try and add the dupe and trap the error. Whereas checking first makes the constraint redundant an does not generate an error.

    Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    I disagree, on the same terms that I do not check whether a file is readonly/accesible/existing when I delete it.

    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P PIEBALDconsult

      SayamiSuchi wrote:

      keyname ... inserted by user

      Then why should it be unique? :confused: If there's something that needs to be unique, then it should be created/set by the system not the user. You already have id, what more do you need?

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Take a list of usernames. Usernames should be unique, but there's usually an identity. The identity is for the system, the username for the user. Same goes for a filename; they need be unique, but you don't let the system choose it.

      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

      P 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Take a list of usernames. Usernames should be unique, but there's usually an identity. The identity is for the system, the username for the user. Same goes for a filename; they need be unique, but you don't let the system choose it.

        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

        P Online
        P Online
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Eddy Vluggen wrote:

        filename; they need be unique

        Not necessarily.

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J J4amieC

          PIEBALDconsult wrote:

          If there's something that needs to be unique, then it should be created/set by the system not the user

          So next time you signup for an online service your username will be papsd9308skjfd9kdi32.

          P Online
          P Online
          PIEBALDconsult
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          Yeah, pretty much, at least I won't have to waste a half hour trying things and trying things always having it tell me it exists. Think of Animal House -- "Your name is Flounder. Your name is Pinto." Simple, saves the user a lot of needless trouble.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P PIEBALDconsult

            Eddy Vluggen wrote:

            filename; they need be unique

            Not necessarily.

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Your new contract is located on the Z-share, and is called "contract.doc". Aw, there are two more files with the same name in there. :z

            Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Mycroft Holmes

              I dislike using these, they tempt the developer into programming by error, try and add the dupe and trap the error. Whereas checking first makes the constraint redundant an does not generate an error.

              Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Meech
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              Again depending upon the database and how the constraint operation is implemented, there may also be performance gains by using the constraint instead of coding it into a program. But your mileage may vary extensively. :)

              Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                I disagree, on the same terms that I do not check whether a file is readonly/accesible/existing when I delete it.

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Mycroft Holmes
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                on the same terms that I do not check whether a file is readonly/accesible/existing when I delete it

                If I am coding file I/O I certainly do!

                Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Your new contract is located on the Z-share, and is called "contract.doc". Aw, there are two more files with the same name in there. :z

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                  P Online
                  P Online
                  PIEBALDconsult
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  That wouldn't be in the database, would it?

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P PIEBALDconsult

                    That wouldn't be in the database, would it?

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    That wouldn't matter, would it? :) Some people generally check every option, others trust in a form of exception-handling.

                    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      That wouldn't matter, would it? :) Some people generally check every option, others trust in a form of exception-handling.

                      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                      P Online
                      P Online
                      PIEBALDconsult
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Yes, it would.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • P PIEBALDconsult

                        Yes, it would.

                        L Offline
                        L Offline
                        Lost User
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Why does it matter to you? Do you make a difference between deleting a file from disk and a file from a database, from an exception-handling viewpoint? :) It's a personal preference; lots of experienced programmers tend to check specific whether a file (or record) exists and whether they've got the appropriate rights to delete it (from disk or database). I prefer to rely on exception-handling, has always worked quite well for me. Do you try-except, or do you return a customized boolean that consists of Yes, No and EFileNotFound?

                        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Why does it matter to you? Do you make a difference between deleting a file from disk and a file from a database, from an exception-handling viewpoint? :) It's a personal preference; lots of experienced programmers tend to check specific whether a file (or record) exists and whether they've got the appropriate rights to delete it (from disk or database). I prefer to rely on exception-handling, has always worked quite well for me. Do you try-except, or do you return a customized boolean that consists of Yes, No and EFileNotFound?

                          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                          P Online
                          P Online
                          PIEBALDconsult
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          I'm pretty sure none of that has anything to do with the original question.

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          a difference between deleting a file from disk and a file from a database

                          Yes. The database will likely return "0 records affected". The file system may simply say "ok, it's gone" even if it didn't exist. Either way, I don't care, just aslong as it's gone.

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          whether they've got the appropriate rights to delete it

                          That's a case where looking first may give inacurate information and you could wind up having to handle an Exception anyway, so I prefer to just try it and see.

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • P PIEBALDconsult

                            I'm pretty sure none of that has anything to do with the original question.

                            Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                            a difference between deleting a file from disk and a file from a database

                            Yes. The database will likely return "0 records affected". The file system may simply say "ok, it's gone" even if it didn't exist. Either way, I don't care, just aslong as it's gone.

                            Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                            whether they've got the appropriate rights to delete it

                            That's a case where looking first may give inacurate information and you could wind up having to handle an Exception anyway, so I prefer to just try it and see.

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            Lost User
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                            I'm pretty sure none of that has anything to do with the original question.

                            True.

                            Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dhyanga

                              let suppose i have table like this:

                              id name key
                              1 sam sam1
                              2 joy joy2

                              name and key are inserted by user. Now whenever i am inserting new value, I need to check whelther I have that key exists or not. If yes, do nothing and if no, insert it. I know how to do it in dot net page but can I do this in sql query itself ? If yes, can anyone please help me..

                              suchita

                              modified on Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:32 AM

                              N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Niladri_Biswas
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Hello SayamiSuchi, This problem can be solved in many ways. Method 1: As has already been answered by UNCRushFan

                              IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT DISTINCT keyname FROM <table_name>)
                              BEGIN
                              INSERT INTO.....
                              END

                              Method 2: Another traditional way [ Count(ColumnName) approach ]

                              Declare @tblSource table([ID] int identity,[Name] varchar(20),[Key] varchar(10))
                              insert into @tblSource Select 'Sam', 'Sam1' Union all Select 'Joy','Joy2'
                              --Select * from @tblSource

                              Declare @key as varchar(10)
                              set @key = 'Joy2'

                              if(( Select count([KEY]) from @tblSource where [key] = @key) = 1)
                              begin
                              insert into @tblSource Select 'NewName', 'NewKey'
                              end

                              Select * from @tblSource

                              Method 3: Merge statement of Sql Server 2008 Consider the below statement first

                              Declare @tblSource table([ID] int identity,[Name] varchar(20),[Key] varchar(10))
                              insert into @tblSource Select 'Sam', 'Sam1' Union all Select 'Joy','Joy2'

                              Declare @tblDestination table([ID] int identity,[Name] varchar(20),[Key] varchar(10))

                              MERGE INTO @tblDestination AS Target
                              USING (SELECT [Name],[Key] FROM @tblSource) AS Source
                              ON Target.[Key] = Source.[Key]
                              WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN
                              INSERT (Name, [Key]) VALUES (Source.Name, Source.[Key]);

                              Select * from @tblDestination

                              I have a source table and a destination table. I am inserting the record in the destination table by checking whether the Key of the source table exists in the destination or not. In this case no key will be found in the destination and hence the output will be

                              ID Name Key
                              1 Sam Sam1
                              2 Joy Joy2

                              Now let us insert a record (with an already existing key) in the source table as

                              insert into @tblSource Select 'Joy','Joy2'

                              At this time the records in the source table will be

                              ID Name Key
                              1 Sam Sam1
                              2 Joy Joy2
                              3 Joy Joy2

                              Now if we run the above Merge statement query

                              MERGE INTO @tblDestination AS Target
                              USING (SELECT [Name],[Key] FROM @tblSource) AS Source
                              ON Target.[Key] = Source.[Key]
                              WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN
                              INSERT (Name, [Key]) VALUES (Source.Name, Source.[Key]);
                              Select * from @tblDestination

                              The output in the destination table will be

                              ID Name Key
                              1 Sam Sam1
                              2 Joy Joy2

                              because the key is already present in the destination table and hence it has been ignored. But if we have the source table as

                              insert into @tblSource Select 'NewName',

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups