Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Database & SysAdmin
  3. Database
  4. check the key value before inserting data [modified]---ALREADY SOLVED---

check the key value before inserting data [modified]---ALREADY SOLVED---

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Database
databasehelptutorialquestion
21 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P PIEBALDconsult

    SayamiSuchi wrote:

    keyname ... inserted by user

    Then why should it be unique? :confused: If there's something that needs to be unique, then it should be created/set by the system not the user. You already have id, what more do you need?

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    Take a list of usernames. Usernames should be unique, but there's usually an identity. The identity is for the system, the username for the user. Same goes for a filename; they need be unique, but you don't let the system choose it.

    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Take a list of usernames. Usernames should be unique, but there's usually an identity. The identity is for the system, the username for the user. Same goes for a filename; they need be unique, but you don't let the system choose it.

      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

      P Online
      P Online
      PIEBALDconsult
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      Eddy Vluggen wrote:

      filename; they need be unique

      Not necessarily.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • J J4amieC

        PIEBALDconsult wrote:

        If there's something that needs to be unique, then it should be created/set by the system not the user

        So next time you signup for an online service your username will be papsd9308skjfd9kdi32.

        P Online
        P Online
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Yeah, pretty much, at least I won't have to waste a half hour trying things and trying things always having it tell me it exists. Think of Animal House -- "Your name is Flounder. Your name is Pinto." Simple, saves the user a lot of needless trouble.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P PIEBALDconsult

          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

          filename; they need be unique

          Not necessarily.

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          Your new contract is located on the Z-share, and is called "contract.doc". Aw, there are two more files with the same name in there. :z

          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

          P 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mycroft Holmes

            I dislike using these, they tempt the developer into programming by error, try and add the dupe and trap the error. Whereas checking first makes the constraint redundant an does not generate an error.

            Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Meech
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            Again depending upon the database and how the constraint operation is implemented, there may also be performance gains by using the constraint instead of coding it into a program. But your mileage may vary extensively. :)

            Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              I disagree, on the same terms that I do not check whether a file is readonly/accesible/existing when I delete it.

              Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Mycroft Holmes
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              Eddy Vluggen wrote:

              on the same terms that I do not check whether a file is readonly/accesible/existing when I delete it

              If I am coding file I/O I certainly do!

              Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Your new contract is located on the Z-share, and is called "contract.doc". Aw, there are two more files with the same name in there. :z

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                P Online
                P Online
                PIEBALDconsult
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                That wouldn't be in the database, would it?

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • P PIEBALDconsult

                  That wouldn't be in the database, would it?

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  That wouldn't matter, would it? :) Some people generally check every option, others trust in a form of exception-handling.

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                  P 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    That wouldn't matter, would it? :) Some people generally check every option, others trust in a form of exception-handling.

                    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                    P Online
                    P Online
                    PIEBALDconsult
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    Yes, it would.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • P PIEBALDconsult

                      Yes, it would.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Why does it matter to you? Do you make a difference between deleting a file from disk and a file from a database, from an exception-handling viewpoint? :) It's a personal preference; lots of experienced programmers tend to check specific whether a file (or record) exists and whether they've got the appropriate rights to delete it (from disk or database). I prefer to rely on exception-handling, has always worked quite well for me. Do you try-except, or do you return a customized boolean that consists of Yes, No and EFileNotFound?

                      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                      P 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L Lost User

                        Why does it matter to you? Do you make a difference between deleting a file from disk and a file from a database, from an exception-handling viewpoint? :) It's a personal preference; lots of experienced programmers tend to check specific whether a file (or record) exists and whether they've got the appropriate rights to delete it (from disk or database). I prefer to rely on exception-handling, has always worked quite well for me. Do you try-except, or do you return a customized boolean that consists of Yes, No and EFileNotFound?

                        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                        P Online
                        P Online
                        PIEBALDconsult
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        I'm pretty sure none of that has anything to do with the original question.

                        Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                        a difference between deleting a file from disk and a file from a database

                        Yes. The database will likely return "0 records affected". The file system may simply say "ok, it's gone" even if it didn't exist. Either way, I don't care, just aslong as it's gone.

                        Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                        whether they've got the appropriate rights to delete it

                        That's a case where looking first may give inacurate information and you could wind up having to handle an Exception anyway, so I prefer to just try it and see.

                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • P PIEBALDconsult

                          I'm pretty sure none of that has anything to do with the original question.

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          a difference between deleting a file from disk and a file from a database

                          Yes. The database will likely return "0 records affected". The file system may simply say "ok, it's gone" even if it didn't exist. Either way, I don't care, just aslong as it's gone.

                          Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                          whether they've got the appropriate rights to delete it

                          That's a case where looking first may give inacurate information and you could wind up having to handle an Exception anyway, so I prefer to just try it and see.

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Lost User
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          PIEBALDconsult wrote:

                          I'm pretty sure none of that has anything to do with the original question.

                          True.

                          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss:

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Dhyanga

                            let suppose i have table like this:

                            id name key
                            1 sam sam1
                            2 joy joy2

                            name and key are inserted by user. Now whenever i am inserting new value, I need to check whelther I have that key exists or not. If yes, do nothing and if no, insert it. I know how to do it in dot net page but can I do this in sql query itself ? If yes, can anyone please help me..

                            suchita

                            modified on Wednesday, June 29, 2011 9:32 AM

                            N Offline
                            N Offline
                            Niladri_Biswas
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #21

                            Hello SayamiSuchi, This problem can be solved in many ways. Method 1: As has already been answered by UNCRushFan

                            IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT DISTINCT keyname FROM <table_name>)
                            BEGIN
                            INSERT INTO.....
                            END

                            Method 2: Another traditional way [ Count(ColumnName) approach ]

                            Declare @tblSource table([ID] int identity,[Name] varchar(20),[Key] varchar(10))
                            insert into @tblSource Select 'Sam', 'Sam1' Union all Select 'Joy','Joy2'
                            --Select * from @tblSource

                            Declare @key as varchar(10)
                            set @key = 'Joy2'

                            if(( Select count([KEY]) from @tblSource where [key] = @key) = 1)
                            begin
                            insert into @tblSource Select 'NewName', 'NewKey'
                            end

                            Select * from @tblSource

                            Method 3: Merge statement of Sql Server 2008 Consider the below statement first

                            Declare @tblSource table([ID] int identity,[Name] varchar(20),[Key] varchar(10))
                            insert into @tblSource Select 'Sam', 'Sam1' Union all Select 'Joy','Joy2'

                            Declare @tblDestination table([ID] int identity,[Name] varchar(20),[Key] varchar(10))

                            MERGE INTO @tblDestination AS Target
                            USING (SELECT [Name],[Key] FROM @tblSource) AS Source
                            ON Target.[Key] = Source.[Key]
                            WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN
                            INSERT (Name, [Key]) VALUES (Source.Name, Source.[Key]);

                            Select * from @tblDestination

                            I have a source table and a destination table. I am inserting the record in the destination table by checking whether the Key of the source table exists in the destination or not. In this case no key will be found in the destination and hence the output will be

                            ID Name Key
                            1 Sam Sam1
                            2 Joy Joy2

                            Now let us insert a record (with an already existing key) in the source table as

                            insert into @tblSource Select 'Joy','Joy2'

                            At this time the records in the source table will be

                            ID Name Key
                            1 Sam Sam1
                            2 Joy Joy2
                            3 Joy Joy2

                            Now if we run the above Merge statement query

                            MERGE INTO @tblDestination AS Target
                            USING (SELECT [Name],[Key] FROM @tblSource) AS Source
                            ON Target.[Key] = Source.[Key]
                            WHEN NOT MATCHED BY TARGET THEN
                            INSERT (Name, [Key]) VALUES (Source.Name, Source.[Key]);
                            Select * from @tblDestination

                            The output in the destination table will be

                            ID Name Key
                            1 Sam Sam1
                            2 Joy Joy2

                            because the key is already present in the destination table and hence it has been ignored. But if we have the source table as

                            insert into @tblSource Select 'NewName',

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups