Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Database & SysAdmin
  3. Database
  4. is it true about MSSQL Database server

is it true about MSSQL Database server

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Database
databasesql-serversysadmin
8 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    netJP12L
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi Guys, I would like to know if this is true for MS SQL Server. Lets say you have 1000 users in your MS SQL database. Does a person has to pay for each of those 1000 of users who uses your application which connects to the database to retrieve the users information. Thanks

    C M 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • N netJP12L

      Hi Guys, I would like to know if this is true for MS SQL Server. Lets say you have 1000 users in your MS SQL database. Does a person has to pay for each of those 1000 of users who uses your application which connects to the database to retrieve the users information. Thanks

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Corporal Agarn
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      With different licensing this would be a case for CPU license.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N netJP12L

        Hi Guys, I would like to know if this is true for MS SQL Server. Lets say you have 1000 users in your MS SQL database. Does a person has to pay for each of those 1000 of users who uses your application which connects to the database to retrieve the users information. Thanks

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mycroft Holmes
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Possibly - the art of deciphering the licencing framework for SQL Server is not one you can easily acquire. We got to the point where we outlined our business model to the MS rep and asked for the best licencing model. I hope he gave us the right one. I'm sure there is a business opportunity there for someone to offer licence model consulting.

        Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

        C C 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • M Mycroft Holmes

          Possibly - the art of deciphering the licencing framework for SQL Server is not one you can easily acquire. We got to the point where we outlined our business model to the MS rep and asked for the best licencing model. I hope he gave us the right one. I'm sure there is a business opportunity there for someone to offer licence model consulting.

          Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Corporal Agarn
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Mycroft Holmes wrote:

          Possibly - the art of deciphering the licencing framework for SQL Server is not one you can easily acquire.

          So true. It took me quite some time to figure out what all the information meant. The MS rep in this case can help. My response is based on the dollars per seat would defiantly be more than the CPU license. I do not remember exactly but the cutoff was around 150 seats (I think).

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mycroft Holmes

            Possibly - the art of deciphering the licencing framework for SQL Server is not one you can easily acquire. We got to the point where we outlined our business model to the MS rep and asked for the best licencing model. I hope he gave us the right one. I'm sure there is a business opportunity there for someone to offer licence model consulting.

            Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Meech
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Mycroft Holmes wrote:

            I'm sure there is a business opportunity there for someone to offer licence model consulting.

            There is already one[^] for Oracle, so there might as well be one for SQL Server. :doh: :laugh: :laugh:

            Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

            W S 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Meech

              Mycroft Holmes wrote:

              I'm sure there is a business opportunity there for someone to offer licence model consulting.

              There is already one[^] for Oracle, so there might as well be one for SQL Server. :doh: :laugh: :laugh:

              Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

              W Offline
              W Offline
              Wendelius
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              And there are also lots of training courses about Oracle licensing. Definitely isn't an easy-to-understand thing. :doh:

              The need to optimize rises from a bad design.My articles[^]

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Corporal Agarn

                Mycroft Holmes wrote:

                Possibly - the art of deciphering the licencing framework for SQL Server is not one you can easily acquire.

                So true. It took me quite some time to figure out what all the information meant. The MS rep in this case can help. My response is based on the dollars per seat would defiantly be more than the CPU license. I do not remember exactly but the cutoff was around 150 seats (I think).

                C Offline
                C Offline
                crocks256
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                There is a break even point where the Cost Per Seat becomes more expensive than the Per CPU. I think the breakeven point is actually quite low at something like 100 Per-User licenses? though I could be wrong.. After this point its more cost effective to just license the box. JC

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Chris Meech

                  Mycroft Holmes wrote:

                  I'm sure there is a business opportunity there for someone to offer licence model consulting.

                  There is already one[^] for Oracle, so there might as well be one for SQL Server. :doh: :laugh: :laugh:

                  Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is. [Yogi Berra] posting about Crystal Reports here is like discussing gay marriage on a catholic church’s website.[Nishant Sivakumar]

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  S Douglas
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  dont worry, they wont forget to add 10% on the top for being part of your business. :wtf:


                  Common sense is admitting there is cause and effect and that you can exert some control over what you understand.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups