Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Invite to Nagy

Invite to Nagy

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comhelpquestiondiscussion
23 Posts 4 Posters 127 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    So, want to discuss those salient facts or don't you have the conviction of your opinions? Nagy Vilmos: So, do you have irrefutable evidence that there is no problem or are you just an arse? [^] Are you ready to discuss this like a grown up instead of like a child? --edit-- Here I am. With some irrefutable evidence for you.... --edit2-- Hmm, still no show from Mr Bigmouth... --edit3-- Four days later and still Mr GutlessNameCaller hasnt got the balls to put his money where his mouth is. Dear oh dear, it is amazing how scared the true believers are of a few simple facts. :)

    ============================== Nothing to say.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Having stated in the other place[^] that I didn't watch Mitchell's stuff, I have just watched the climate doubters video. But, the question as to whether Mitchell's rant was scripted. General agreement that it was and rehearsed prior to recording. So, who missed "a 0.1% chance, that's only 1 in 10,000"? Does raise doubts as to the veracity of the rest of the video, due diligence before publication and all that.

    Be dogmatic, not thoughtful. It's easier, and you get bumper stickers.- Anon.

    G 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Having stated in the other place[^] that I didn't watch Mitchell's stuff, I have just watched the climate doubters video. But, the question as to whether Mitchell's rant was scripted. General agreement that it was and rehearsed prior to recording. So, who missed "a 0.1% chance, that's only 1 in 10,000"? Does raise doubts as to the veracity of the rest of the video, due diligence before publication and all that.

      Be dogmatic, not thoughtful. It's easier, and you get bumper stickers.- Anon.

      G Offline
      G Offline
      GuyThiebaut
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      I spotted that too :thumbsup: - a small mistake really that needn't detract from the bigger picture...

      Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • G GuyThiebaut

        I spotted that too :thumbsup: - a small mistake really that needn't detract from the bigger picture...

        Continuous effort - not strength or intelligence - is the key to unlocking our potential.(Winston Churchill)
        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        GuyThiebaut wrote:

        a small mistake really that needn't detract from the bigger picture...

        OK, howsabout the emphasis on the acceptance of climate change by the American Association of Petroleum Geologists? AAPG Statement: Climate Change.[^] Issue: In the last century, growth in human population has increased energy use. This has contributed additional carbon dioxide (CO2) and other gases to the atmosphere. Although the AAPG membership is divided on the degree of influence that anthropogenic CO2 has on recent and potential global temperature increases, AAPG believes that expansion of scientific climate research into the basic controls [specifically including the geological, solar, and astronomic aspects of climate change] on climate is important. (My insert from the text of the Statement.) If you read the Statement (it is brief), you might find its acceptance of AGW to be somewhat lukewarm (or even kinda absent :) ).

        Be dogmatic, not thoughtful. It's easier, and you get bumper stickers.- Anon.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups