search result not as expected
-
Hi, I search "SQL Server Monitor", articles only, a very new article with title "SQL Server Monitor with Version Control" does not show in the first page result, so I changed sort by to "Date Modified ASC", I could not see it until I reach 4th page. Well, from my point of view, "SQL Server Monitor with Version Control" is more relevant to "SQL Server Monitor".
Regards, unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com http://www.xnlab.com
-
Hi, I search "SQL Server Monitor", articles only, a very new article with title "SQL Server Monitor with Version Control" does not show in the first page result, so I changed sort by to "Date Modified ASC", I could not see it until I reach 4th page. Well, from my point of view, "SQL Server Monitor with Version Control" is more relevant to "SQL Server Monitor".
Regards, unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com http://www.xnlab.com
Unruled Boy wrote:
I changed sort by to "Date Modified ASC", I could not see it until I reach 4th page
You would want to use "Date Modified DESC". They really should rename those to "Most Recently Modified First" and "Oldest Modified First".
Somebody in an online forum wrote:
INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.
-
Hi, I search "SQL Server Monitor", articles only, a very new article with title "SQL Server Monitor with Version Control" does not show in the first page result, so I changed sort by to "Date Modified ASC", I could not see it until I reach 4th page. Well, from my point of view, "SQL Server Monitor with Version Control" is more relevant to "SQL Server Monitor".
Regards, unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com http://www.xnlab.com
In my experience, the only organization that comes close to understanding relevance is Google. I always use Date Created Desc[^], it is the only one that works for me. And I made it a browser favorite, so I always get creation order automatically (as long as I avoid all the CP search boxes). :) [EDIT] Link fixed, once more a victim of the arbitrarily-truncate-pasted-link-bug that has been plaguing CP for months now [/EDIT]
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
-
Unruled Boy wrote:
I changed sort by to "Date Modified ASC", I could not see it until I reach 4th page
You would want to use "Date Modified DESC". They really should rename those to "Most Recently Modified First" and "Oldest Modified First".
Somebody in an online forum wrote:
INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.
And I was thinking both DESK and ASK had a K, not a C. :)
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
-
Unruled Boy wrote:
I changed sort by to "Date Modified ASC", I could not see it until I reach 4th page
You would want to use "Date Modified DESC". They really should rename those to "Most Recently Modified First" and "Oldest Modified First".
Somebody in an online forum wrote:
INTJs never really joke. They make a point. The joke is just a gift wrapper.
well, now it works as expected :laugh:
Regards, unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com http://www.xnlab.com
-
In my experience, the only organization that comes close to understanding relevance is Google. I always use Date Created Desc[^], it is the only one that works for me. And I made it a browser favorite, so I always get creation order automatically (as long as I avoid all the CP search boxes). :) [EDIT] Link fixed, once more a victim of the arbitrarily-truncate-pasted-link-bug that has been plaguing CP for months now [/EDIT]
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
tricky, but are you sure you are having the latest favorite? because when I click your link, it's still sort by relevance and when I click search, it's really not for the date created :doh:
Regards, unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com http://www.xnlab.com
-
And I was thinking both DESK and ASK had a K, not a C. :)
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum
I have to loop up the dictionary first ;P
Regards, unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com http://www.xnlab.com
-
tricky, but are you sure you are having the latest favorite? because when I click your link, it's still sort by relevance and when I click search, it's really not for the date created :doh:
Regards, unruledboy_at_gmail_dot_com http://www.xnlab.com
all fixed now. Thanks. :)
Luc Pattyn [My Articles] Nil Volentibus Arduum