Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. If you can't say anything nice...

If you can't say anything nice...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
comhelpquestion
8 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C Offline
    C Offline
    Chris Losinger
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/01/03/MN120712.DTL&nl=fix[^] The GWB gang has decided to cut funding for a US Labor Department program that generated a monthly report on layoffs. Their last report said that 240,000 US workers were layed off in November. 62,000 in California alone. :~ Like someone else's mama always said "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." -c


    I'm not the droid you're looking for.

    ThumbNailer

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • C Chris Losinger

      http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2003/01/03/MN120712.DTL&nl=fix[^] The GWB gang has decided to cut funding for a US Labor Department program that generated a monthly report on layoffs. Their last report said that 240,000 US workers were layed off in November. 62,000 in California alone. :~ Like someone else's mama always said "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything at all." -c


      I'm not the droid you're looking for.

      ThumbNailer

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Saving $6.6 million per year for a few reports that any news agency could compile for free sounds like a good idea to me. Mike Mullikin :beer:

      Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Saving $6.6 million per year for a few reports that any news agency could compile for free sounds like a good idea to me. Mike Mullikin :beer:

        Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

        C Offline
        C Offline
        Chris Losinger
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        how does a news agency get to do it "for free" ? if there's a way to do it for free, then that's what the govt should be doing. -c


        I'm not the droid you're looking for.

        ThumbNailer

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Losinger

          how does a news agency get to do it "for free" ? if there's a way to do it for free, then that's what the govt should be doing. -c


          I'm not the droid you're looking for.

          ThumbNailer

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Chris Losinger wrote: how does a news agency get to do it "for free" ? Poor choice of words on my part. :-O How's this: News agencies routinely compile and report this information already (using their own funds) and thusly we have no need for government redundancy. Mike Mullikin :beer:

          Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Chris Losinger wrote: how does a news agency get to do it "for free" ? Poor choice of words on my part. :-O How's this: News agencies routinely compile and report this information already (using their own funds) and thusly we have no need for government redundancy. Mike Mullikin :beer:

            Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Chris Losinger
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Mike Mullikin wrote: News agencies routinely compile and report this information already where do they get their data ?


            I'm not the droid you're looking for.

            ThumbNailer

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • C Chris Losinger

              Mike Mullikin wrote: News agencies routinely compile and report this information already where do they get their data ?


              I'm not the droid you're looking for.

              ThumbNailer

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Chris Losinger wrote: where do they get their data ? Every time there is a corporate mass layoff there is a news conference or press release. Mike Mullikin :beer:

              Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

              C 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Chris Losinger wrote: where do they get their data ? Every time there is a corporate mass layoff there is a news conference or press release. Mike Mullikin :beer:

                Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

                C Offline
                C Offline
                Chris Losinger
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                i guess that's true. i'm not sure it's enough to go on, but it would probably get you in the ballpark. but, my real point for the post was... 240,000 people were layed off... in november. -c


                I'm not the droid you're looking for.

                ThumbNailer

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C Chris Losinger

                  i guess that's true. i'm not sure it's enough to go on, but it would probably get you in the ballpark. but, my real point for the post was... 240,000 people were layed off... in november. -c


                  I'm not the droid you're looking for.

                  ThumbNailer

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  One other interesting aspect of that article is that it doesn't mention how many people lost their job when the agency shut-down. ;P Mike Mullikin :beer:

                  Some mornings, it's just not worth chewing through the leather straps. - Emo Philips

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups