Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Yet Another Parody Web Site

Yet Another Parody Web Site

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
8 Posts 6 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Offline
    N Offline
    nihadar
    wrote last edited by
    #1

    That neat MSLinux site reminded me of this site, aimed at those in LD relationships: FuFme

    S M 3 Replies Last reply
    0
    • N nihadar

      That neat MSLinux site reminded me of this site, aimed at those in LD relationships: FuFme

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Sameer Bhat
      wrote last edited by
      #2

      Oh man. Somebody had *far* too much time on their hands

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N nihadar

        That neat MSLinux site reminded me of this site, aimed at those in LD relationships: FuFme

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Member_15387284
        wrote last edited by
        #3

        Hey, I'm not one to ruin anybody's fun here, but don't put stuff like that on here, please! I'm at work, and don't care to be questioned about the sites that I'm viewing

        N 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N nihadar

          That neat MSLinux site reminded me of this site, aimed at those in LD relationships: FuFme

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Member_15387284
          wrote last edited by
          #4

          Hey, I'm not one to ruin anybody's fun here, but don't put stuff like that on here, please! I'm at work, and don't care to be questioned about the sites that I'm viewing

          B 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Member_15387284

            Hey, I'm not one to ruin anybody's fun here, but don't put stuff like that on here, please! I'm at work, and don't care to be questioned about the sites that I'm viewing

            N Offline
            N Offline
            nihadar
            wrote last edited by
            #5

            D'oh, sorry 'bout that. I'll post a "not work-safe" disclaimer in the future

            J 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • N nihadar

              D'oh, sorry 'bout that. I'll post a "not work-safe" disclaimer in the future

              J Offline
              J Offline
              jeabrown
              wrote last edited by
              #6

              Good idea. Let's also implement it into an Interface so we can embed it into xxx-apps.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Member_15387284

                Hey, I'm not one to ruin anybody's fun here, but don't put stuff like that on here, please! I'm at work, and don't care to be questioned about the sites that I'm viewing

                B Offline
                B Offline
                BESExpress
                wrote last edited by
                #7

                It's up to you to click on hyperlink. Nobody forces you to do it..

                S 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B BESExpress

                  It's up to you to click on hyperlink. Nobody forces you to do it..

                  S Offline
                  S Offline
                  Software Developers Journal
                  wrote last edited by
                  #8

                  This is true but you're missing the point. Most text containing hyperlinks contains a description of what the link is for. In this case, the link's description didn't say much about it except that it was for those with "LD relationships". It said nothing about it containing sexual material, which to most (if not all) companies is highly objectionable. So what Jamie is asking for is just a warning message for any links that may be considered objectionable by corporate "big brothers". I don't think he personally had anything against the link itself but his superiors may have thought differently and he just didn't want to deal with such an issue. Personally, I agree with him. Regards, Alvaro

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups