Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Weird and The Wonderful
  4. What was I thinking

What was I thinking

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Weird and The Wonderful
database
20 Posts 16 Posters 24 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • G G James

    My personal favorite from C#. Someone was testing the value of a boolean variable.

    if (someBooleanVariable == true)
    return true;
    else
    return false;

    Later they refactored it to this thinking it was an improvement. :)

    return someBooleanVariable == true ? true : false;

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jonathan C Dickinson
    wrote on last edited by
    #9

    G James wrote:

    Later they refactored it to this thinking it was an improvement. :)

    return someBooleanVariable == true ? true : false;

    That's pretty poor refactoring, it should have been:

    interface IBooleanConverter {
    bool BooleanToBoolean(bool value);
    }

    class BooleanConverter : IBooleanConverter {
    public BooleanToBoolean(bool value) {
    return value == true ? true : false;
    }
    }

    interface IBooleanConverterFactory {
    IBooleanConverter CreateBooleanConverterFactory();
    }

    class ConfigurationBooleanConverterFactory : IBooleanConverter {
    public IBooleanConverter CreateBooleanConverter() {
    return (IBooleanConverter)
    Activator.CreateInstance(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Types.BooleanConverter"]);
    }
    }

    static class BooleanConverterFactoryFactory {
    public IBooleanConverterFactory CreateBooleanConverterFactory() {
    return (IBooleanConverterFactory)
    Activator.CreateInstance(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Types.BooleanConverterFactory"]);
    }
    }

    // ...

    return BooleanConverterFactoryFactory.CreateBooleanConverterFactory().CreateBooleanConverter().BooleanToBoolean(someBooleanVariable == true ? true : false);

    It is clear that this is more maintainable. There is currently this method in our code-base because some [one] of our developers is so bad that we need to hold his hand through everything:

    public static T As(this object obj) {
    return obj as T;
    }

    Yes guys, an extension method that replicates a keyword.

    He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Chinese Proverb] Jonathan C Dickinson (C# Software Engineer)

    S R 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • J Jonathan C Dickinson

      G James wrote:

      Later they refactored it to this thinking it was an improvement. :)

      return someBooleanVariable == true ? true : false;

      That's pretty poor refactoring, it should have been:

      interface IBooleanConverter {
      bool BooleanToBoolean(bool value);
      }

      class BooleanConverter : IBooleanConverter {
      public BooleanToBoolean(bool value) {
      return value == true ? true : false;
      }
      }

      interface IBooleanConverterFactory {
      IBooleanConverter CreateBooleanConverterFactory();
      }

      class ConfigurationBooleanConverterFactory : IBooleanConverter {
      public IBooleanConverter CreateBooleanConverter() {
      return (IBooleanConverter)
      Activator.CreateInstance(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Types.BooleanConverter"]);
      }
      }

      static class BooleanConverterFactoryFactory {
      public IBooleanConverterFactory CreateBooleanConverterFactory() {
      return (IBooleanConverterFactory)
      Activator.CreateInstance(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Types.BooleanConverterFactory"]);
      }
      }

      // ...

      return BooleanConverterFactoryFactory.CreateBooleanConverterFactory().CreateBooleanConverter().BooleanToBoolean(someBooleanVariable == true ? true : false);

      It is clear that this is more maintainable. There is currently this method in our code-base because some [one] of our developers is so bad that we need to hold his hand through everything:

      public static T As(this object obj) {
      return obj as T;
      }

      Yes guys, an extension method that replicates a keyword.

      He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Chinese Proverb] Jonathan C Dickinson (C# Software Engineer)

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Sentenryu
      wrote on last edited by
      #10

      my eyes bleed and my head hurts X| it's so dificult to believe i'm seeing so well structured shit-code :doh:

      I'm brazilian and english (well, human languages in general) aren't my best skill, so, sorry by my english. (if you want we can speak in C# or VB.Net =p)

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Sentenryu

        my eyes bleed and my head hurts X| it's so dificult to believe i'm seeing so well structured shit-code :doh:

        I'm brazilian and english (well, human languages in general) aren't my best skill, so, sorry by my english. (if you want we can speak in C# or VB.Net =p)

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Jonathan C Dickinson
        wrote on last edited by
        #11

        Sentenryu wrote:

        it's so dificult to believe i'm seeing so well structured sh*t-code

        And a lesson has been learnt about GOF design patterns :D.

        He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Chinese Proverb] Jonathan C Dickinson (C# Software Engineer)

        R 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Corporal Agarn

          While editing a much tweaked process that I wrote, I found this T-SQL:

          DECLARE @NumDays INT;
          SELECT @NumDays =
          CASE
          WHEN @Client = 'Client1' THEN @DaysBack
          WHEN @Client = 'Client2' THEN @DaysBack
          ELSE @DaysBack
          END;

          This is what happens when you go from actual numbers to a variable, without checking the code. :-O

          T Offline
          T Offline
          Tomz_KV
          wrote on last edited by
          #12

          This could make a good business sense when some decisions for different clients have not been made. Make the code structure ready and wait for the changes. I recently worked on a project in which different user role was supposed to have a different permission. But the decision was not made. Therefore all roles were assigned the same permission during development. Sometimes, the decision is never made. Several years later, when you look at the code, you would question why you did that.

          TOMZ_KV

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Maunder

            You mean they missed the totally obvious contraction to

            return someBooleanVariable ? true : false

            They should hang their head in shame!

            cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Andrew Rissing
            wrote on last edited by
            #13

            You're not following good form. You should use CONSTANTS for things that like.

            return someBooleanVariable ? Boolean.Parse(Boolean.TrueString) : Boolean.Parse(Boolean.FalseString);

            ;)

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A Andrew Rissing

              You're not following good form. You should use CONSTANTS for things that like.

              return someBooleanVariable ? Boolean.Parse(Boolean.TrueString) : Boolean.Parse(Boolean.FalseString);

              ;)

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Maunder
              wrote on last edited by
              #14

              You mean

              return someBooleanVariable.ToString() == Boolean.TrueString? Boolean.Parse(Boolean.TrueString) : Boolean.Parse(Boolean.FalseString);

              Right?

              cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

              A 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Maunder

                You mean

                return someBooleanVariable.ToString() == Boolean.TrueString? Boolean.Parse(Boolean.TrueString) : Boolean.Parse(Boolean.FalseString);

                Right?

                cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                A Offline
                A Offline
                Andrew Rissing
                wrote on last edited by
                #15

                Good call. :D

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jonathan C Dickinson

                  Sentenryu wrote:

                  it's so dificult to believe i'm seeing so well structured sh*t-code

                  And a lesson has been learnt about GOF design patterns :D.

                  He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Chinese Proverb] Jonathan C Dickinson (C# Software Engineer)

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Ranjan D
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #16

                  I hope you are not one of those gang of 4 guys :omg:

                  Ranjan.D

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • 3 33deepak

                    well, it should be just

                    return someBooleanVariable

                    :-D

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    James Lonero
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #17

                    It took this long to get this simple return?

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Maunder

                      You mean they missed the totally obvious contraction to

                      return someBooleanVariable ? true : false

                      They should hang their head in shame!

                      cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jecc
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #18

                      Chris Maunder wrote:

                      You mean they missed the totally obvious contraction to

                      return someBooleanVariable ? true : false

                      They should hang their head in shame!

                      No! Wrong!

                      return (someBooleanVariable == true)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Maunder

                        You mean they missed the totally obvious contraction to

                        return someBooleanVariable ? true : false

                        They should hang their head in shame!

                        cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project | Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

                        N Offline
                        N Offline
                        Nagy Vilmos
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #19

                        Not good enough:

                        if (((Boolean)someBooleanVariable).equals(true)) {
                        return someBooleanVariable == true ? someBooleanVariable : false;
                        } else {
                        return someBooleanVariable == false ? someBooleanVariable : true;
                        }

                        it's called the Irish Method - to be sure, to be sure, to be sure.


                        Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done. Drink. Get drunk. Fall over - P O'H OK, I will win to day or my name isn't Ethel Crudacre! - DD Ethel Crudacre I cannot live by bread alone. Bacon and ketchup are needed as well. - Trollslayer Have a bit more patience with newbies. Of course some of them act dumb - they're often *students*, for heaven's sake - Terry Pratchett

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Jonathan C Dickinson

                          G James wrote:

                          Later they refactored it to this thinking it was an improvement. :)

                          return someBooleanVariable == true ? true : false;

                          That's pretty poor refactoring, it should have been:

                          interface IBooleanConverter {
                          bool BooleanToBoolean(bool value);
                          }

                          class BooleanConverter : IBooleanConverter {
                          public BooleanToBoolean(bool value) {
                          return value == true ? true : false;
                          }
                          }

                          interface IBooleanConverterFactory {
                          IBooleanConverter CreateBooleanConverterFactory();
                          }

                          class ConfigurationBooleanConverterFactory : IBooleanConverter {
                          public IBooleanConverter CreateBooleanConverter() {
                          return (IBooleanConverter)
                          Activator.CreateInstance(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Types.BooleanConverter"]);
                          }
                          }

                          static class BooleanConverterFactoryFactory {
                          public IBooleanConverterFactory CreateBooleanConverterFactory() {
                          return (IBooleanConverterFactory)
                          Activator.CreateInstance(ConfigurationManager.AppSettings["Types.BooleanConverterFactory"]);
                          }
                          }

                          // ...

                          return BooleanConverterFactoryFactory.CreateBooleanConverterFactory().CreateBooleanConverter().BooleanToBoolean(someBooleanVariable == true ? true : false);

                          It is clear that this is more maintainable. There is currently this method in our code-base because some [one] of our developers is so bad that we need to hold his hand through everything:

                          public static T As(this object obj) {
                          return obj as T;
                          }

                          Yes guys, an extension method that replicates a keyword.

                          He who asks a question is a fool for five minutes. He who does not ask a question remains a fool forever. [Chinese Proverb] Jonathan C Dickinson (C# Software Engineer)

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rob Grainger
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #20

                          Ah, now I see what people mean by maintainable code - code that will require maintenance, and hence pay the bills for years to come. Genius.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups