Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Product Lifecycle
  3. Free Tools
  4. AdBlockPlus replacement

AdBlockPlus replacement

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Free Tools
comperformance
2 Posts 2 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Richard DeemingR Offline
    Richard DeemingR Offline
    Richard Deeming
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Cross-posted from the Lounge[^] as requested by OriginalGriff. As Matthew pointed out last December[^], using AdBlockPlus can dramatically slow down your browser, and eat memory like it's the last bacon sandwich on Earth. Scott Hanselman's just posted a link to a new alternative: µBlock[^]. It claims to have a much lower memory footprint, much lower CPU, and block more ads. NB: Avast currently claims[^] the add-on has a poor reputation. It's possible that this is just because not many Avast users have installed it, but caveat emptor.


    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

      Cross-posted from the Lounge[^] as requested by OriginalGriff. As Matthew pointed out last December[^], using AdBlockPlus can dramatically slow down your browser, and eat memory like it's the last bacon sandwich on Earth. Scott Hanselman's just posted a link to a new alternative: µBlock[^]. It claims to have a much lower memory footprint, much lower CPU, and block more ads. NB: Avast currently claims[^] the add-on has a poor reputation. It's possible that this is just because not many Avast users have installed it, but caveat emptor.


      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

      R Offline
      R Offline
      RobertSK
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      after "short" test in Windows Firefox: Work: Yes Lower memory usage: Yes thanks for tip

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups