Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
CODE PROJECT For Those Who Code
  • Home
  • Articles
  • FAQ
Community
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. Chemical weapons

Chemical weapons

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
javacomquestionannouncement
42 Posts 18 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Le centriste

    Marc Clifton wrote: I think it could be argued that the gas chambers of Auschwitz (sp?), et al could be considered a WMD, or Hilter's V2 rockets. And the kamakaze suicide style of the Japanese might be considered a WMD. I think you are out of your mind. This is not the same thing.

    S Offline
    S Offline
    Shog9 0
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Michel Prévost wrote: This is not the same thing. Dead is Dead. d'jaknow?

    -------------------------- Shog9 -------------------------- ------- Happiness is something you decide on ahead of time -------

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • N Nitron

      Jonny Newman wrote: I still think its funny that the US is so anti-WMD when it is the only country to have used them against another country. (Hiroshima Nagasaki) What is funny about it? Maybe I don't get it, but the hydrogen bombs you mention pale in comparison to nukes we have now. By several orders of magnitude. How could that possibly be even remotely funny? - Nitron


      "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Le centriste
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      The point he's trying to make is that the US is the only country to have ever used WMD against another country (japan). As a side note, US is the only country to have used chemical in war (vietnam).

      PJ ArendsP N 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • L Le centriste

        The point he's trying to make is that the US is the only country to have ever used WMD against another country (japan). As a side note, US is the only country to have used chemical in war (vietnam).

        PJ ArendsP Offline
        PJ ArendsP Offline
        PJ Arends
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        Michel Prévost wrote: As a side note, US is the only country to have used chemical in war (vietnam). BS! You forget about WWI. both sides used all sorts of chemicals on each other. Iraq used them in the Iran-Iraq war (maybe Iran did too, don't recall) I am sure there have been many others.


        [

        ](http://www.canucks.com)Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little "You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03 Within you lies the power for good - Use it!

        Within you lies the power for good; Use it!

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J Jon Newman

          I still think its [edit]funny* ironic[/edit] that the US is so anti-WMD when it is the only country to have used them against another country. (Hiroshima Nagasaki) * hope this makes my point clearer to understand
             I walk these roads,    I climb these mountains,    Though they are nothing,    But paths and hills,    for the only mountain is success,    and the only road is life.

          P Offline
          P Offline
          peterchen
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          As I see it, even a conventional bomb is an WMD: - One-click interface to kill many - You can't run, you can't hide, you can't surrender (unlike someone sitting in the trenches) Yes, wars should be fought again with sticks and stones, and the leaders should run ahead (ride? Which horse has deserved that?)


          If you go to war, you will destroy a great country a stoned greek chick to the richest man of the world
          sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • PJ ArendsP PJ Arends

            Michel Prévost wrote: As a side note, US is the only country to have used chemical in war (vietnam). BS! You forget about WWI. both sides used all sorts of chemicals on each other. Iraq used them in the Iran-Iraq war (maybe Iran did too, don't recall) I am sure there have been many others.


            [

            ](http://www.canucks.com)Sonork 100.11743 Chicken Little "You're obviously a superstar." - Christian Graus about me - 12 Feb '03 Within you lies the power for good - Use it!

            P Offline
            P Offline
            peterchen
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            Yes, Iran did too, and the "mass-slaughtered civilians" got caught inbetween.


            If you go to war, you will destroy a great country a stoned greek chick to the richest man of the world
            sighist | Agile Programming | doxygen

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jon Newman

              I still think its [edit]funny* ironic[/edit] that the US is so anti-WMD when it is the only country to have used them against another country. (Hiroshima Nagasaki) * hope this makes my point clearer to understand
                 I walk these roads,    I climb these mountains,    Though they are nothing,    But paths and hills,    for the only mountain is success,    and the only road is life.

              K Offline
              K Offline
              KaRl
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              You forget WWI, chemical warfares are WMD


              Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Le centriste

                Marc Clifton wrote: I think it could be argued that the gas chambers of Auschwitz (sp?), et al could be considered a WMD, or Hilter's V2 rockets. And the kamakaze suicide style of the Japanese might be considered a WMD. I think you are out of your mind. This is not the same thing.

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Marc Clifton
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                This is not the same thing. Why? What's the difference between dropping a bomb on a city vs. herding entire populations into gas chambers, and in the process killing millions more than died by atomic bombs? Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
                Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
                Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
                Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • K KaRl

                  You forget WWI, chemical warfares are WMD


                  Angels banished from heaven have no choice but to become demons Cowboy Bebop

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jon Newman
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  OK, in reply to all the replies i got to this. By funny, i meant, its a bit ironic that they have such a passion against them. And also, if you want a generic description of what WMD's are and where to draw the lines. The only 'real' WMD is human beings. Dubya will be a WMD if he goes ahead. Saddam is a WMD. The guy next door could be a WMD if he filled a can with anthrax and set it off in a large buldings ventilation system. Its all a matter of opinion. However, Dubya seems to mean CNB weapons. Which to me means, obviously nukes, large rockets with large quantities of poison gas or rockets with a bi-agent that could take out a city. My definition of 'mass destruction' is a city-wide disaster/explosion/whatever or more, i.e. a nuke, a rocket of poison gas etc...
                     I walk these roads,    I climb these mountains,    Though they are nothing,    But paths and hills,    for the only mountain is success,    and the only road is life.

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M Marc Clifton

                    More for the point of discussion than anything else, I think it could be argued that the gas chambers of Auschwitz (sp?), et al could be considered a WMD, or Hilter's V2 rockets. And the kamakaze suicide style of the Japanese might be considered a WMD. I think there's more to a WMD than one big boom. Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
                    Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
                    Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
                    Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Sadly, I agree. Knee jerk responses to this kind of subject are depressing. The tigress is here :-D

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Le centriste

                      The point he's trying to make is that the US is the only country to have ever used WMD against another country (japan). As a side note, US is the only country to have used chemical in war (vietnam).

                      N Offline
                      N Offline
                      Nitron
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      I understand that. What I don't get is how it's funny? I don't recall anyone laughing when the US ended the war with [edit]atom[/edit] bombs. - Nitron


                      "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                      D C 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • N Nitron

                        I understand that. What I don't get is how it's funny? I don't recall anyone laughing when the US ended the war with [edit]atom[/edit] bombs. - Nitron


                        "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Dy
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        Funny as in ironic, not as in "ha-ha". Just a fugure of speach.


                        Dylan

                        N 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Jon Newman

                          OK, in reply to all the replies i got to this. By funny, i meant, its a bit ironic that they have such a passion against them. And also, if you want a generic description of what WMD's are and where to draw the lines. The only 'real' WMD is human beings. Dubya will be a WMD if he goes ahead. Saddam is a WMD. The guy next door could be a WMD if he filled a can with anthrax and set it off in a large buldings ventilation system. Its all a matter of opinion. However, Dubya seems to mean CNB weapons. Which to me means, obviously nukes, large rockets with large quantities of poison gas or rockets with a bi-agent that could take out a city. My definition of 'mass destruction' is a city-wide disaster/explosion/whatever or more, i.e. a nuke, a rocket of poison gas etc...
                             I walk these roads,    I climb these mountains,    Though they are nothing,    But paths and hills,    for the only mountain is success,    and the only road is life.

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rohit Sinha
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          Jonny Newman wrote: By funny, i meant, its a bit ironic that they have such a passion against them. Why don't you edit your original post to indicate this? It seems a lot of people are taking the word "funny" literally. And besides, I think it can be argued that because the US has used those weapons, they know what kind of catastrophic effect it can have, and don't want it to happen again.
                          Regards,

                          Rohit Sinha

                          Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
                          - Abraham Lincoln

                          The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
                          - Anonymous

                          J J 2 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • N Nitron

                            Jonny Newman wrote: I still think its funny that the US is so anti-WMD when it is the only country to have used them against another country. (Hiroshima Nagasaki) What is funny about it? Maybe I don't get it, but the hydrogen bombs you mention pale in comparison to nukes we have now. By several orders of magnitude. How could that possibly be even remotely funny? - Nitron


                            "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                            C Offline
                            C Offline
                            Chris Maunder
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            I think he meant: funny == ironic cheers, Chris Maunder

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Dy

                              Funny as in ironic, not as in "ha-ha". Just a fugure of speach.


                              Dylan

                              N Offline
                              N Offline
                              Nitron
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              Dylan Kenneally wrote: Funny as in ironic Ok, then how is it ironic? Since the claim is that the US was the only country ever to use WMD, then only the US should have the right to say they know the results first hand, and never want it repeated. Remember Nagasaki and Hiroshima was a different time, with different thinking. Like Slavery or the Roman Empire. Sure it seems like a bad idea looking back on it, but the times and the rationalization was different. - Nitron


                              "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                              Y 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Marc Clifton

                                This is not the same thing. Why? What's the difference between dropping a bomb on a city vs. herding entire populations into gas chambers, and in the process killing millions more than died by atomic bombs? Marc Help! I'm an AI running around in someone's f*cked up universe simulator.
                                Sensitivity and ethnic diversity means celebrating difference, not hiding from it. - Christian Graus
                                Every line of code is a liability - Taka Muraoka
                                Microsoft deliberately adds arbitrary layers of complexity to make it difficult to deliver Windows features on non-Windows platforms--Microsoft's "Halloween files"

                                C Offline
                                C Offline
                                Chris Losinger
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                Marc Clifton wrote: What's the difference between dropping a bomb on a city vs. herding entire populations into gas chambers in one case, you do the job from a plane 3 miles up (or these days, from an underground bunker or a submarine). in the other, you stand there and watch actual people walk into the chamber. one is cold and sterile, the other is brutal and cruel. i don't think either is really much less evil than the other. -c


                                When history comes, it always takes you by surprise.

                                Bobber!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • J Jon Newman

                                  I still think its [edit]funny* ironic[/edit] that the US is so anti-WMD when it is the only country to have used them against another country. (Hiroshima Nagasaki) * hope this makes my point clearer to understand
                                     I walk these roads,    I climb these mountains,    Though they are nothing,    But paths and hills,    for the only mountain is success,    and the only road is life.

                                  N Offline
                                  N Offline
                                  Nitron
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  OK, we cleared up the "funny" part. Now you say: Jonny Newman wrote: the US is so anti-WMD when it is the only country to have used them against another country Well, then does this not grant the US the right to be the only country to claim they know first-hand the internal consequences of using such weapons? Thus the US does not want such a thing repeated. No other country can make that claim. - Nitron


                                  "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                                  J 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • N Nitron

                                    I understand that. What I don't get is how it's funny? I don't recall anyone laughing when the US ended the war with [edit]atom[/edit] bombs. - Nitron


                                    "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    Chris Losinger
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    Nitron wrote: I don't recall anyone laughing when the US ended the war with hydrogen bombs. well, they didn't use hydrogen bombs. nobody has ever used a hydrogen bomb on anything but a test range. in 1945, they used good old atomic/fission bombs. a hydrogen bomb is a fusion device - and is essentially a fission bomb wrapped in a layer of material that will go into a fusion reaction when the atomic bomb goes off. it's like an M-80 inside a can of gasoline. -c


                                    When history comes, it always takes you by surprise.

                                    Bobber!

                                    N 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • C Chris Losinger

                                      Nitron wrote: I don't recall anyone laughing when the US ended the war with hydrogen bombs. well, they didn't use hydrogen bombs. nobody has ever used a hydrogen bomb on anything but a test range. in 1945, they used good old atomic/fission bombs. a hydrogen bomb is a fusion device - and is essentially a fission bomb wrapped in a layer of material that will go into a fusion reaction when the atomic bomb goes off. it's like an M-80 inside a can of gasoline. -c


                                      When history comes, it always takes you by surprise.

                                      Bobber!

                                      N Offline
                                      N Offline
                                      Nitron
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Chris Losinger wrote: they didn't use hydrogen bombs discrepency noted. thanks. - Nitron


                                      "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Rohit Sinha

                                        Jonny Newman wrote: By funny, i meant, its a bit ironic that they have such a passion against them. Why don't you edit your original post to indicate this? It seems a lot of people are taking the word "funny" literally. And besides, I think it can be argued that because the US has used those weapons, they know what kind of catastrophic effect it can have, and don't want it to happen again.
                                        Regards,

                                        Rohit Sinha

                                        Character is like a tree, and reputation like its shadow. The shadow is what we think of it; the tree is the real thing.
                                        - Abraham Lincoln

                                        The whole world steps aside for the man who knows where he is going.
                                        - Anonymous

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        Jon Newman
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        Rohit Sinha wrote: Why don't you edit your original post to indicate this? Will do. Rohit Sinha wrote: And besides, I think it can be argued that because the US has used those weapons, they know what kind of catastrophic effect it can have, and don't want it to happen again. I think the Japanese have a good idea of how it felt too. They knew it would be catastrophic. It to me was for many reasons. One being to stop the Japanese, which IMHO could have been done in conventional ways. and Two, to show the Russians what they could do.
                                           I walk these roads,    I climb these mountains,    Though they are nothing,    But paths and hills,    for the only mountain is success,    and the only road is life.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • N Nitron

                                          OK, we cleared up the "funny" part. Now you say: Jonny Newman wrote: the US is so anti-WMD when it is the only country to have used them against another country Well, then does this not grant the US the right to be the only country to claim they know first-hand the internal consequences of using such weapons? Thus the US does not want such a thing repeated. No other country can make that claim. - Nitron


                                          "Those that say a task is impossible shouldn't interrupt the ones who are doing it." - Chinese Proverb

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          Jon Newman
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          Is the US going to clean up the entire world of WMD? If so shouldn't it start with itself? I'm not sure of the figures, but the US has a substantial number of tactical nukes and other weapons that could devastate a large nation. Leading by example should be taken over leading by 'bullying'. PLus, if the US is so 'pro-democracy' in the sense that it wants to spread democracy to the rest of the world. Why is it threatening to go ahead with the war with or without the UN, which is a democratic orgonisation itself is it not, at its core.
                                             I walk these roads,    I climb these mountains,    Though they are nothing,    But paths and hills,    for the only mountain is success,    and the only road is life.

                                          N 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups