Spam in QA
-
www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11583619[^] Post[^]
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
-
www.codeproject.com/script/Membership/View.aspx?mid=11583619[^] Post[^]
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
Gone Offtopic: I don't see it necessary to post "on X" in every report within a moderate time lapse. I mean, if 1 hour later you come and the reported is on 2... it is perfectly normal. So the message "on 2" is not really needed. Same situation but you come, he is on 2 but the report is 1 or 2 days before your message, then I think it is ok to flag "hey guys, this one is still alive" Do you know what I mean?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Gone Offtopic: I don't see it necessary to post "on X" in every report within a moderate time lapse. I mean, if 1 hour later you come and the reported is on 2... it is perfectly normal. So the message "on 2" is not really needed. Same situation but you come, he is on 2 but the report is 1 or 2 days before your message, then I think it is ok to flag "hey guys, this one is still alive" Do you know what I mean?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
I understand ,but i thought we are so fast we kick the spammer with in hours if i mentioned like "on 2 or 3" somebody would pay attention suddenly when open the page ,I hope we don't take 2 or 3 days to kick out the spammer. Is it possible to each member open the each post and check is the spammer is alive or not? So that i tried to mention .Sorry ,I agree and i won't repeat it. :(( :((
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
-
I understand ,but i thought we are so fast we kick the spammer with in hours if i mentioned like "on 2 or 3" somebody would pay attention suddenly when open the page ,I hope we don't take 2 or 3 days to kick out the spammer. Is it possible to each member open the each post and check is the spammer is alive or not? So that i tried to mention .Sorry ,I agree and i won't repeat it. :(( :((
நெஞ்சு பொறுக்கு திலையே-இந்த நிலைகெட்ட மனிதரை நினைந்துவிட்டால்
Don't take it so bad.
King Fisher wrote:
if i mentioned like "on 2 or 3" somebody would pay attention suddenly when open the page
That is the same as the "gone" message. If I don't see it, I check the message and its links. But "gone" is only one message. "on 2", some time later "on 5", "on 8" and so on... I only try to avoid fast increase in the board-load (see below)
King Fisher wrote:
I hope we don't take 2 or 3 days to kick out the spammer
It is not usual but it happens. There are days where spammers are very active and then people watching the board overview some reports because they get down very fast. Or reports done as answer to another message, instead of a new thread... there are several constelations that can bring to the situation.
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.