LaTeX broken [Edited]?
-
It seems LaTeX for my article doesn't work: Maths in IT #1: Basic set theory[^]. It displays text such as: (\lambda \notin E) I know it worked before as I manually entered and checked it (my posts after this one have images instead of 'direct' LaTeX so they work fine). [Edit] Replaced the LaTeX in the article with images, just like my other articles. [/Edit]
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
-
It seems LaTeX for my article doesn't work: Maths in IT #1: Basic set theory[^]. It displays text such as: (\lambda \notin E) I know it worked before as I manually entered and checked it (my posts after this one have images instead of 'direct' LaTeX so they work fine). [Edit] Replaced the LaTeX in the article with images, just like my other articles. [/Edit]
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
I also had problems with the Latex editor, and Chris is working on it (I think you have a related or the same issue?) http://www.codeproject.com/suggestions.aspx?msg=5164070#xx5164070xx[^]
-
I also had problems with the Latex editor, and Chris is working on it (I think you have a related or the same issue?) http://www.codeproject.com/suggestions.aspx?msg=5164070#xx5164070xx[^]
Yeah, I guess it is! Only noticed it a few days back. The fun part is my article is getting good ratings even though it's now full with weird codes that don't make sense :laugh:
Visit my blog at Sander's bits - Writing the code you need. Or read my articles at my CodeProject profile.
Simplicity is prerequisite for reliability. — Edsger W. Dijkstra
Regards, Sander
