Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. Menu on the left from articles

Menu on the left from articles

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
databaseoraclecomtoolshelp
7 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T Offline
    T Offline
    Tom Deketelaere
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    When going to this article: Refreshing Mule Cache Using Oracle Database Change Notification - CodeProject[^] It is reported as plagiarized so might be gone by the time you read this, but I'v seen it on other articles as well. When I scroll down on that article the menu on the left gets shrunk to unreadable. "Article" becomes "Ar", "browse code" becomes "br" ... This happens the moment the menu is supposed to scroll down, so the moment the "Article" word is at the top of the page. Browser: Chrome 48.0.2564.109 m Since resolution is probably a factor here: 1366 x 768 On a side note for future reference: Do you prefer 2 separate posts with 1 bug report or 1 post with 2 reports?

    Tom

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • T Tom Deketelaere

      When going to this article: Refreshing Mule Cache Using Oracle Database Change Notification - CodeProject[^] It is reported as plagiarized so might be gone by the time you read this, but I'v seen it on other articles as well. When I scroll down on that article the menu on the left gets shrunk to unreadable. "Article" becomes "Ar", "browse code" becomes "br" ... This happens the moment the menu is supposed to scroll down, so the moment the "Article" word is at the top of the page. Browser: Chrome 48.0.2564.109 m Since resolution is probably a factor here: 1366 x 768 On a side note for future reference: Do you prefer 2 separate posts with 1 bug report or 1 post with 2 reports?

      Tom

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Does not happen on my system; same resolution and Chrome version.

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        Does not happen on my system; same resolution and Chrome version.

        T Offline
        T Offline
        Tom Deketelaere
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Very strange. This is the html I get when it happens (for that menu div)

        And this is the html before it happens:

        When I hover it the menu width does seem to be correct but the "Article Moderation: Should this article be published?" box is on top of it. So it's not so much a shrinking problem but a z-order problem (I think)

        Tom

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T Tom Deketelaere

          Very strange. This is the html I get when it happens (for that menu div)

          And this is the html before it happens:

          When I hover it the menu width does seem to be correct but the "Article Moderation: Should this article be published?" box is on top of it. So it's not so much a shrinking problem but a z-order problem (I think)

          Tom

          C Offline
          C Offline
          Chris Maunder
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Let me know next time you see it and I'll dig in. As a complete aside: Chrome 48. I really wish they'd learn what a "major" version is. Looking at the version history I see 45 -> 46 was - Change in taskbar logo design - A number of fixes and improvements.[r 109] - Under the hood performance and stability tweaks.[r 110] (Android version) Seriously? :rolleyes:

          cheers Chris Maunder

          Richard DeemingR T 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • C Chris Maunder

            Let me know next time you see it and I'll dig in. As a complete aside: Chrome 48. I really wish they'd learn what a "major" version is. Looking at the version history I see 45 -> 46 was - Change in taskbar logo design - A number of fixes and improvements.[r 109] - Under the hood performance and stability tweaks.[r 110] (Android version) Seriously? :rolleyes:

            cheers Chris Maunder

            Richard DeemingR Offline
            Richard DeemingR Offline
            Richard Deeming
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            I've just seen the problem in Firefox 44.0.2: Raspberry<-->SPI<-->Microchip - CodeProject[^] Screen-shot: CodeProject-Article-Menu-Bug.png (23.4 KB)[^] My browser window (document.body.offsetWidth) is 1605px wide. If I close the bookmarks bar, the menu appears fully. If I shrink the window, the menu disappears fully. Looks like it's the huge images in that article - they're 1366px wide:

            <img src="/KB/Articles/1078315/2016-02-14_.png" width="1366px" height="768px">

            That forces the central <td> to expand to 1396px. With article-wing-right taking up 170px, and 18px margin around the table, that only leaves 21px for article-wing-left. When the menu position is static, the table gets pushed off the right-hand edge of the screen. But when the menu position is fixed, the containing <td> shrinks. Adding table-layout:fixed; to the container-article-parts table would probably fix the problem. :)


            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

            "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

            T 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

              I've just seen the problem in Firefox 44.0.2: Raspberry<-->SPI<-->Microchip - CodeProject[^] Screen-shot: CodeProject-Article-Menu-Bug.png (23.4 KB)[^] My browser window (document.body.offsetWidth) is 1605px wide. If I close the bookmarks bar, the menu appears fully. If I shrink the window, the menu disappears fully. Looks like it's the huge images in that article - they're 1366px wide:

              <img src="/KB/Articles/1078315/2016-02-14_.png" width="1366px" height="768px">

              That forces the central <td> to expand to 1396px. With article-wing-right taking up 170px, and 18px margin around the table, that only leaves 21px for article-wing-left. When the menu position is static, the table gets pushed off the right-hand edge of the screen. But when the menu position is fixed, the containing <td> shrinks. Adding table-layout:fixed; to the container-article-parts table would probably fix the problem. :)


              "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

              T Offline
              T Offline
              Tom Deketelaere
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              That's what I was seeing as well only far better explained and with a solution as well. :thumbsup:

              Tom

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Maunder

                Let me know next time you see it and I'll dig in. As a complete aside: Chrome 48. I really wish they'd learn what a "major" version is. Looking at the version history I see 45 -> 46 was - Change in taskbar logo design - A number of fixes and improvements.[r 109] - Under the hood performance and stability tweaks.[r 110] (Android version) Seriously? :rolleyes:

                cheers Chris Maunder

                T Offline
                T Offline
                Tom Deketelaere
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                For the problem see Richards post :) As for the version numbers: Thank "whatever sky-pixi you want", I'm not alone in getting annoyed by this whole "race for the highest version number" that seems to be going on.

                Tom

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                Reply
                • Reply as topic
                Log in to reply
                • Oldest to Newest
                • Newest to Oldest
                • Most Votes


                • Login

                • Don't have an account? Register

                • Login or register to search.
                • First post
                  Last post
                0
                • Categories
                • Recent
                • Tags
                • Popular
                • World
                • Users
                • Groups