Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Crazy Specification

Crazy Specification

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
8 Posts 5 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    I just seen the RECOMMENDED requirements for VisualStdio .Net beta one: 256mb Ram 700mhz Processor ... and I reckon you'll need a 19" monitor (lots of real estate needed). Whats every one using out there... I'm on a 550mhz 128bm Ram 17" Monitor The vicious software -> hardware circle starts again. Also how is the .Net runtimes going to get redistrubuted to the a clients PC, and what will have to be the Clients PC spec. Regards Norm

    C D M M 4 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      I just seen the RECOMMENDED requirements for VisualStdio .Net beta one: 256mb Ram 700mhz Processor ... and I reckon you'll need a 19" monitor (lots of real estate needed). Whats every one using out there... I'm on a 550mhz 128bm Ram 17" Monitor The vicious software -> hardware circle starts again. Also how is the .Net runtimes going to get redistrubuted to the a clients PC, and what will have to be the Clients PC spec. Regards Norm

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Chris Maunder
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      This is a little crazy - especially since the preview version (which you assume is all bloated and unoptimised) runs fine on any decent (>300MHz) machine. Certainly my celeron 300 w/128Mb (and tiny 17" screen :)) handles it admirably. It's always nice to have more real estate, but it's easy to configure all the docking windows so that only the important ones are visible as you switch between different languages, so it's not as bad as some of the screen shots make it seem :) Dealing with IIS5 and ASP 3 is getting me really, REALLY keen to get my hands on a release version of .NET. IIS is a PITA! cheers, Chris Maunder

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        I just seen the RECOMMENDED requirements for VisualStdio .Net beta one: 256mb Ram 700mhz Processor ... and I reckon you'll need a 19" monitor (lots of real estate needed). Whats every one using out there... I'm on a 550mhz 128bm Ram 17" Monitor The vicious software -> hardware circle starts again. Also how is the .Net runtimes going to get redistrubuted to the a clients PC, and what will have to be the Clients PC spec. Regards Norm

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dominic I Holmes
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        I have an Athalon 550 MHz, with 356MB RAM and a 19". It's always too slow, it always run out of memory, and I can never see everything I want on screen. Until my machine can predict what I want, respond in the absolute blink of an eye, never run out of memory, and have at least a wall size display, I think this will always be the norm. We are a society of extremely high expections of our gadgets. Unfortunately, the bulk of the software out there (read MicroSoft) will always keep up with the fast & better machines to make sure they don't really work any better than the current offering. And pity the fool who can't upgrade. Unfortunately, the honet programmers who truely want to write compact and efficient code will be left behind in favor of bloated code that gets there first. Most users would rather have the newest, coolest features, today, even if they require another 50MB of diskspace. Rather than wait even a couple of months for the smaller, faster equivalent. That's just a fact of our short attention span society. I remember my first 10MB hard drive. All that space. What to do with it all, what to do... And that neat 1.2MB 5 1/4 disk upgrade. My how times change... Dominic

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          I just seen the RECOMMENDED requirements for VisualStdio .Net beta one: 256mb Ram 700mhz Processor ... and I reckon you'll need a 19" monitor (lots of real estate needed). Whats every one using out there... I'm on a 550mhz 128bm Ram 17" Monitor The vicious software -> hardware circle starts again. Also how is the .Net runtimes going to get redistrubuted to the a clients PC, and what will have to be the Clients PC spec. Regards Norm

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Member 1208965
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Norm, Microsoft has said that the requirements for the beta are much much higher than they will be for the shipping version. To my knowledge they haven't actually stated what the final target is for minimum requirements, and the pessimist in me thinks they won't squeeze it into anything too tiny. :) Hey, it's still a year (or more) away from release according to a recent review by Gartner and in that time I'm sure that 700mhz and 256mb of Ram will be the standard config for CE devices, let alone your desktop ...

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            I just seen the RECOMMENDED requirements for VisualStdio .Net beta one: 256mb Ram 700mhz Processor ... and I reckon you'll need a 19" monitor (lots of real estate needed). Whats every one using out there... I'm on a 550mhz 128bm Ram 17" Monitor The vicious software -> hardware circle starts again. Also how is the .Net runtimes going to get redistrubuted to the a clients PC, and what will have to be the Clients PC spec. Regards Norm

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Matt Eckerson
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            Besides, most of us will need to upgrade anyway when Doom 3 hits the shelves ;) Matt

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M Matt Eckerson

              Besides, most of us will need to upgrade anyway when Doom 3 hits the shelves ;) Matt

              C Offline
              C Offline
              Chris Maunder
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              They are making a Doom 3??

              M 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Chris Maunder

                They are making a Doom 3??

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Matt Eckerson
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                Yes! He's interviewed a little bit about it here, which is just enough to verify it...:) Voodoo Extreme Interview with John Carmack

                C 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M Matt Eckerson

                  Yes! He's interviewed a little bit about it here, which is just enough to verify it...:) Voodoo Extreme Interview with John Carmack

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  Chris Maunder
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  sweet!

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups