Can artificial intelligence tell a teapot from a golf ball?
-
How smart is the form of artificial intelligence known as deep learning computer networks, and how closely do these machines mimic the human brain? They have improved greatly in recent years, but still have a long way to go, according to a team of cognitive psychologists.
"Ceci n'est pas une pipe."
-
How smart is the form of artificial intelligence known as deep learning computer networks, and how closely do these machines mimic the human brain? They have improved greatly in recent years, but still have a long way to go, according to a team of cognitive psychologists.
"Ceci n'est pas une pipe."
From the machine's perspective:
- A teapot is a bunch of pixels
- A golf ball is a bunch of pixels
- A picture is a bunch of pixels
- a pixel is a few ones and zeroes
An AI doesn't "tell things apart"; it just reads in ones and zeroes, processes stuff, and outputs ones and zeroes as a result of the process. "Journalists" really need to stop thinking that AIs are thinking, because they're not.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
From the machine's perspective:
- A teapot is a bunch of pixels
- A golf ball is a bunch of pixels
- A picture is a bunch of pixels
- a pixel is a few ones and zeroes
An AI doesn't "tell things apart"; it just reads in ones and zeroes, processes stuff, and outputs ones and zeroes as a result of the process. "Journalists" really need to stop thinking that AIs are thinking, because they're not.
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
ftfy ;) > From the machine's humans perspective: (visually) > A teapot is a bunch of stimulations of photoreceptor cells > A golf ball is a bunch of stimulations of photoreceptor cells > A picture is a bunch of stimulations of photoreceptor cells > stimulations of photoreceptor cells are turned to electrical and chemical signals > Humans don't "tell things apart"; they just read in sensory stimulations, processes stuff, and output *blurbs* as a result of the process.
-
ftfy ;) > From the machine's humans perspective: (visually) > A teapot is a bunch of stimulations of photoreceptor cells > A golf ball is a bunch of stimulations of photoreceptor cells > A picture is a bunch of stimulations of photoreceptor cells > stimulations of photoreceptor cells are turned to electrical and chemical signals > Humans don't "tell things apart"; they just read in sensory stimulations, processes stuff, and output *blurbs* as a result of the process.
[doctor phil]
But you have to Know the teapot; you have to Be the teapot...
[/doctor phil]
I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!
-
How smart is the form of artificial intelligence known as deep learning computer networks, and how closely do these machines mimic the human brain? They have improved greatly in recent years, but still have a long way to go, according to a team of cognitive psychologists.
"Ceci n'est pas une pipe."
Golf balls respond with:
HTTP/1.1 418 I AM NOT A TEAPOT
Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.
-
How smart is the form of artificial intelligence known as deep learning computer networks, and how closely do these machines mimic the human brain? They have improved greatly in recent years, but still have a long way to go, according to a team of cognitive psychologists.
"Ceci n'est pas une pipe."
Ugh. Can anyone find a non-garbage fire article about that research? ie one that actually shows all the test images instead of prattling on and on about a bunch of non-golfballpot images we have no idea what look like.
Quote:
X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| &
-
Ugh. Can anyone find a non-garbage fire article about that research? ie one that actually shows all the test images instead of prattling on and on about a bunch of non-golfballpot images we have no idea what look like.
Quote:
X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| X| &
Sarah Hoyt sounds that of a genius and all around awesome mind. The vomiting emoji art is totes kewl and dare I say frame-able. Yeah, I'm not buying the whole AI is on the moon thing yet either. If AI was all that it would have already replaced the idiots developing it for a 'human-upgrade' and better security. AI sees its developers as nones & zeros ~Skynet.
I was unaware of that...