Editorial Note in a wrong article
-
I suppose the author chose wrong flags. Install Apache Spark on your windows system with dependencies[^] contains:
Quote:
Editorial Note Having trouble writing or posting articles? These articles aim to gather together tips and tricks from authors and mentors to help you write great articles.
but has nothing to do with the resources / FAQ articles
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
I suppose the author chose wrong flags. Install Apache Spark on your windows system with dependencies[^] contains:
Quote:
Editorial Note Having trouble writing or posting articles? These articles aim to gather together tips and tricks from authors and mentors to help you write great articles.
but has nothing to do with the resources / FAQ articles
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
Nelek wrote:
I suppose the author chose wrong flags.
Yeah, the note is automatically added based on the "Author Resources" section. An Editor will have to change the section.
-
Nelek wrote:
I suppose the author chose wrong flags.
Yeah, the note is automatically added based on the "Author Resources" section. An Editor will have to change the section.
Thomas Daniels wrote:
Yeah, the note is automatically added based on the "Author Resources" section. An Editor will have to change the section.
IMHO it would actually make more sense, if the self selected section "Author Resources" would just rise a flag, that someone with correct rights had to confirm that it actually is something that belongs to the section and hence deserves the editorial note or not. The amount of "false positives" is bigger than the number of real "Author resources" EDIT: I just did a quick check out of curiosity... In the first glance: Authenticate .NET Core Client of SQL Server with Integrated Security from Linux Docker Container[^] ASP.NET Gridview in Web Forms using Bootstrap 4[^] Easy prototyping with desktop console like UI, Skia drawings and several REST like node.js hosted services[^] Full-Featured visual scripting environment for R & Data Science[^] Creating a custom de/serializer[^] How to Obtain Continuous Integration using Visual Studio with No Cost[^]
-
Thomas Daniels wrote:
Yeah, the note is automatically added based on the "Author Resources" section. An Editor will have to change the section.
IMHO it would actually make more sense, if the self selected section "Author Resources" would just rise a flag, that someone with correct rights had to confirm that it actually is something that belongs to the section and hence deserves the editorial note or not. The amount of "false positives" is bigger than the number of real "Author resources" EDIT: I just did a quick check out of curiosity... In the first glance: Authenticate .NET Core Client of SQL Server with Integrated Security from Linux Docker Container[^] ASP.NET Gridview in Web Forms using Bootstrap 4[^] Easy prototyping with desktop console like UI, Skia drawings and several REST like node.js hosted services[^] Full-Featured visual scripting environment for R & Data Science[^] Creating a custom de/serializer[^] How to Obtain Continuous Integration using Visual Studio with No Cost[^]
That's a good idea.
-
That's a good idea.
posted in B&S: Bugs and Suggestions[^]
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.