Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. Site Bugs / Suggestions
  4. Orphaned threads bug becoming dangerous...

Orphaned threads bug becoming dangerous...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Site Bugs / Suggestions
pythoncomhelpdiscussion
3 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Richard DeemingR Offline
    Richard DeemingR Offline
    Richard Deeming
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    See the start of the Python forum: Tennis racket - Python Discussion Boards[^] trønderen's reply was to a now-deleted message from a spammer. I had replied to let him know, saying "The OP is a spammer. :)" The original message has now gone, so it looks like I was saying that Member 15868796 is a spammer, which he isn't. (At least not yet; so far, he's just a lazy student who's posted three identical copies of his code without any details.) I've deleted my reply, but if anyone read the broken thread without paying attention, this bug could have caused a non-spammer to be incorrectly flagged as a spammer.


    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

    "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined" - Homer

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Richard DeemingR Richard Deeming

      See the start of the Python forum: Tennis racket - Python Discussion Boards[^] trønderen's reply was to a now-deleted message from a spammer. I had replied to let him know, saying "The OP is a spammer. :)" The original message has now gone, so it looks like I was saying that Member 15868796 is a spammer, which he isn't. (At least not yet; so far, he's just a lazy student who's posted three identical copies of his code without any details.) I've deleted my reply, but if anyone read the broken thread without paying attention, this bug could have caused a non-spammer to be incorrectly flagged as a spammer.


      "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Slacker007
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      My post below is related to the same type of bug.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • S Slacker007

        My post below is related to the same type of bug.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jeron1
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Agreed, the difference perhaps is that I don't believe that the OP was removed or deleted (I, of course could be wrong in that assumption).

        "the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        Reply
        • Reply as topic
        Log in to reply
        • Oldest to Newest
        • Newest to Oldest
        • Most Votes


        • Login

        • Don't have an account? Register

        • Login or register to search.
        • First post
          Last post
        0
        • Categories
        • Recent
        • Tags
        • Popular
        • World
        • Users
        • Groups