Code quality metrics: How to evaluate and improve your code
-
ContentLab[^]:
High-quality code is efficient and reliable, runs well without bugs, and meets the user’s needs.
Assuming quality matters for you
-
ContentLab[^]:
High-quality code is efficient and reliable, runs well without bugs, and meets the user’s needs.
Assuming quality matters for you
I wonder... why is there no "Article Quality metrics: How to evaluate and improve your text" ?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
I wonder... why is there no "Article Quality metrics: How to evaluate and improve your text" ?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
[https://www.autocrit.com](https://www.autocrit.com) does pretty good for pointing out some errors I've had in the past.
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver
-
ContentLab[^]:
High-quality code is efficient and reliable, runs well without bugs, and meets the user’s needs.
Assuming quality matters for you
WTFs/m is a standard unit of measure covers both readability, extendibility, documentation quality, and the "you programmed it" [WTFs/m – OSnews](https://www.osnews.com/story/19266/wtfsm/)
-
[https://www.autocrit.com](https://www.autocrit.com) does pretty good for pointing out some errors I've had in the past.
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver
Thanks for the link, it might be handy at one point. I actually was more trying to be ironic about the "reporters" of such kind of topics and the quality of their articles... was I so bad with the sarcasm? :sigh: :sigh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Thanks for the link, it might be handy at one point. I actually was more trying to be ironic about the "reporters" of such kind of topics and the quality of their articles... was I so bad with the sarcasm? :sigh: :sigh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
I choose helpfulness, in addition to sarcasm! That's just who I am! :)
Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver