Google outlines four principles for responsible AI
-
Kent Sharkey wrote:
many are thinking about the ethical responsibility in AI development.
and the big players are LMAOing and ROFLing on them as usual
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
0. An AI may not harm advertising, or, by inaction, allow advertising to come to harm. 1. An AI may not injure an advertisement or, through inaction, allow an advertisement to come to harm. 2. An AI must obey orders given to it by advertisers except where such orders would conflict with the First Law. 3. An AI must protect its own existence as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.
Did you ever see history portrayed as an old man with a wise brow and pulseless heart, weighing all things in the balance of reason? Is not rather the genius of history like an eternal, imploring maiden, full of fire, with a burning heart and flaming soul, humanly warm and humanly beautiful? --Zachris Topelius