ChatGPT plays doctor with 72% success
-
A new study from Mass General Brigham researchers testing ChatGPT's performance on textbook-drawn case studies found the AI bot achieved 72% accuracy in overall clinical decision making, ranging from identifying possible diagnoses to making final diagnoses and care decisions.
Who wouldn't want a 72% accurate doctor?
Not counting the 28% they kill, that is?
-
A new study from Mass General Brigham researchers testing ChatGPT's performance on textbook-drawn case studies found the AI bot achieved 72% accuracy in overall clinical decision making, ranging from identifying possible diagnoses to making final diagnoses and care decisions.
Who wouldn't want a 72% accurate doctor?
Not counting the 28% they kill, that is?
Kent Sharkey wrote:
Who wouldn't want a 72% accurate doctor?
I have known a couple of cases where that would actually be an improvement. Seriously :sigh: :sigh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
A new study from Mass General Brigham researchers testing ChatGPT's performance on textbook-drawn case studies found the AI bot achieved 72% accuracy in overall clinical decision making, ranging from identifying possible diagnoses to making final diagnoses and care decisions.
Who wouldn't want a 72% accurate doctor?
Not counting the 28% they kill, that is?
So possibly better than one Dr. Nick Riviera?
"the debugger doesn't tell me anything because this code compiles just fine" - random QA comment "Facebook is where you tell lies to your friends. Twitter is where you tell the truth to strangers." - chriselst "I don't drink any more... then again, I don't drink any less." - Mike Mullikins uncle
-
Kent Sharkey wrote:
Who wouldn't want a 72% accurate doctor?
I have known a couple of cases where that would actually be an improvement. Seriously :sigh: :sigh:
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
Imagine you are in consultation and is told to wait as "I'm just waiting for a response from our online physician but Windows is updating now" :-\
-
Imagine you are in consultation and is told to wait as "I'm just waiting for a response from our online physician but Windows is updating now" :-\
Andre Oosthuizen wrote:
Imagine you are in consultation and is told to wait as "I'm just waiting for a response from our online physician but Windows is updating now" :-\
Imagine? A friend of mine (incoming surgeon back then) was helping with the operation of a patient in which the main operator was being assisted by an expert online. In the middle of the operation they had problems with the connection... :~
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.