Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Insider News
  4. The Python developers clinging to Python 2

The Python developers clinging to Python 2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Insider News
pythonhtmlcomgraphicsdevops
4 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    Kent Sharkey
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Infoworld[^]:

    Python Software Foundation survey finds that a significant number of Python developers are still using Python 2 for data analysis, computer graphics, and devops.

    No one expects a breaking upgrade

    N 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K Kent Sharkey

      Infoworld[^]:

      Python Software Foundation survey finds that a significant number of Python developers are still using Python 2 for data analysis, computer graphics, and devops.

      No one expects a breaking upgrade

      N Offline
      N Offline
      Nemanja Trifunovic
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Color me shocked. There are still people who develop in VB6.

      utf8-cpp

      B 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N Nemanja Trifunovic

        Color me shocked. There are still people who develop in VB6.

        utf8-cpp

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Bernhard Hiller
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        VB6? Stupid poor boys. What about COBOL, MUMPS, FORTRAN? That's where to find the MONEY.

        Oh sanctissimi Wilhelmus, Theodorus, et Fredericus!

        T 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Bernhard Hiller

          VB6? Stupid poor boys. What about COBOL, MUMPS, FORTRAN? That's where to find the MONEY.

          Oh sanctissimi Wilhelmus, Theodorus, et Fredericus!

          T Offline
          T Offline
          trønderen
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Bernhard Hiller wrote:

          What about COBOL, MUMPS, FORTRAN?

          Fortran programmers of today are not using Fortran IV. If that is what you grew up with, you wouldn't recognize today's Fortran at all as Fortran! During the academic discussions leading up to Fortran 77, one of the gurus (I don't remember who of them) commented on the proposed extensions: 'I don't know what programming languages will look like in year 2000, but they will be named Fortran.' He certainly was right. Fortran 2003 didn't at all look like 'classical' Fortran, and since then, we have had 20 further years of development, where Fortran has changed a lot more than, say, C++ or C#. A new revision is scheduled before the end of the year. (Scheduled release dates for Fortran revisions have a long history of sliding, though!) You may still dislike Fortran 2018 as well as the 2023 revisions. But do not confuse Fortran 23 with Fortran IV.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups