I'm looking for review in terms of readability, approachability of this code
-
// renders a Scalable Vector Graphic (SVG)
// as an ASCII image
// takes a filename and an optional
// numeric percentage for scaling
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
using namespace gfx;// prints a source as 4-bit grayscale ASCII
template
void print_ascii(const Source& src) {
// the color table
static const char* col_table = " .,-~;+=x!1%$O@#";
// move through the draw source
for (int y = 0; y < src.dimensions().height; ++y) {
for (int x = 0; x < src.dimensions().width; ++x) {
typename Source::pixel_type px;
// get the pixel at the current point
src.point(point16(x, y), &px);
// convert it to 4-bit grayscale (0-15)
const auto px2 = convert>(px);
// get the solitary "L" (luminosity) channel value off the pixel
size_t i = px2.template channel();
// use it as an index into the color table
putchar(col_table[i]);
}
putchar('\r'); putchar('\n');
}
}
int main(int argc, char** argv) {
if(argc>1) { // at least 1 param
float scale = 1; // scale of SVG
if(argc>2) { // 2nd arg is scale percentage
int pct = atoi(argv[2]);
if(pct>0 && pct<1000) {
scale = ((float)pct/100.0f);
}
}
// open the SVG file
file_stream fs(argv[1]);
svg_doc doc;
// read it
svg_doc::read(&fs,&doc);
fs.close();
// create a bitmap the size of our final scaled SVG
auto bmp = create_bitmap>(
{uint16_t(doc.dimensions().width*scale),
uint16_t(doc.dimensions().height*scale)});
// if not out of mem allocating bitmap
if (bmp.begin()) {
// clear it
bmp.clear(bmp.bounds());
// draw the SVG
draw::svg(bmp,bmp.bounds(),doc,scale);
// dump as ascii
print_ascii(bmp);
// free the bmp
free(bmp.begin());
}
}
return (argc<1);
}And there's this documentation[^] I was wondering how difficult it
honey the codewitch wrote:
I was wondering how difficult it is to follow
Presuming it is the docs and not the code... Some review comments...(I didn't review completely - just randomly jumping around.) I suggest that you use a different name than 'GFX'. Possible that you might even be required to since a company uses that. Also makes it easier to google for information on it if it much more unique. You just start right up into what I can only presume is the setup. I say presumably because you do not actually state that. As an intro? example there should only be one example. Myself I prefer that code blocks are indented from explaining text. There is nothing in the entire document about exceptions or errors. Nor troubleshooting. ---------------------------------- Pixels Intro is a bit odd. There are subsections but those are not in the table of contents? Pixels section is also hanging out by itself in table of contents. Perhaps Pixels should be under 'Addendum'? Seems like it might fit. Arduino TFT Bus Lots of stuff like 'PIN_NUM_CS' in code. Is that a stand in for actual hard value? A macro that user must define? From the library (your library) that you reference? Streams This seems extreme. Anyone that is going to be using this successfully needs to already understand a fairly high level of programming. So is this section needed? Suspend and Resume What happens if there is a suspend but then I want to stop completely? Drivers This is in the wrong location based on the content (sparse). This and what you put in the header suggests you need a section on setting up to use the library including decisions (with examples) that one might make. Tools Fontgen seems to make sense to me but Bingen doesn't. Always concerning to me when header files initialize data. Which is what the text seems to suggest with 'test_dat_stream'? There is an odd 'performance' link at the bottom of this page?
-
honey the codewitch wrote:
I was wondering how difficult it is to follow
Presuming it is the docs and not the code... Some review comments...(I didn't review completely - just randomly jumping around.) I suggest that you use a different name than 'GFX'. Possible that you might even be required to since a company uses that. Also makes it easier to google for information on it if it much more unique. You just start right up into what I can only presume is the setup. I say presumably because you do not actually state that. As an intro? example there should only be one example. Myself I prefer that code blocks are indented from explaining text. There is nothing in the entire document about exceptions or errors. Nor troubleshooting. ---------------------------------- Pixels Intro is a bit odd. There are subsections but those are not in the table of contents? Pixels section is also hanging out by itself in table of contents. Perhaps Pixels should be under 'Addendum'? Seems like it might fit. Arduino TFT Bus Lots of stuff like 'PIN_NUM_CS' in code. Is that a stand in for actual hard value? A macro that user must define? From the library (your library) that you reference? Streams This seems extreme. Anyone that is going to be using this successfully needs to already understand a fairly high level of programming. So is this section needed? Suspend and Resume What happens if there is a suspend but then I want to stop completely? Drivers This is in the wrong location based on the content (sparse). This and what you put in the header suggests you need a section on setting up to use the library including decisions (with examples) that one might make. Tools Fontgen seems to make sense to me but Bingen doesn't. Always concerning to me when header files initialize data. Which is what the text seems to suggest with 'test_dat_stream'? There is an odd 'performance' link at the bottom of this page?
Thanks! I'll bookmark this feedback and use it when I do a doc update.
Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
-
Ha! What's jarring to me is When people write partial sentences. - punctuating and capitalizing them as though they are complete sentences. Comments to me are usually partial thoughts rather than complete sentences like if(ptr) { // if not out of mem memcpy(buf,ptr,sizeof(buf)); // copy it } Like that, so that's why I do not punctuate
Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
Exactly ... missing punctuation (for me) is an incomplete thought. My comments are comments; and sometimes they are instructions; and sometimes they are warnings. Anything else is noise.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
-
honey the codewitch wrote:
I was wondering how difficult it is to follow
Presuming it is the docs and not the code... Some review comments...(I didn't review completely - just randomly jumping around.) I suggest that you use a different name than 'GFX'. Possible that you might even be required to since a company uses that. Also makes it easier to google for information on it if it much more unique. You just start right up into what I can only presume is the setup. I say presumably because you do not actually state that. As an intro? example there should only be one example. Myself I prefer that code blocks are indented from explaining text. There is nothing in the entire document about exceptions or errors. Nor troubleshooting. ---------------------------------- Pixels Intro is a bit odd. There are subsections but those are not in the table of contents? Pixels section is also hanging out by itself in table of contents. Perhaps Pixels should be under 'Addendum'? Seems like it might fit. Arduino TFT Bus Lots of stuff like 'PIN_NUM_CS' in code. Is that a stand in for actual hard value? A macro that user must define? From the library (your library) that you reference? Streams This seems extreme. Anyone that is going to be using this successfully needs to already understand a fairly high level of programming. So is this section needed? Suspend and Resume What happens if there is a suspend but then I want to stop completely? Drivers This is in the wrong location based on the content (sparse). This and what you put in the header suggests you need a section on setting up to use the library including decisions (with examples) that one might make. Tools Fontgen seems to make sense to me but Bingen doesn't. Always concerning to me when header files initialize data. Which is what the text seems to suggest with 'test_dat_stream'? There is an odd 'performance' link at the bottom of this page?
Regarding your comments on my use of
xandy, I honestly can't think of a more descriptive name for them, as they translate directly to 2D cartesian coordinates*. In math that's x and y. *y is inverted. Anyway, do you have suggestions for those, as I am drawing a blank?Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
-
Regarding your comments on my use of
xandy, I honestly can't think of a more descriptive name for them, as they translate directly to 2D cartesian coordinates*. In math that's x and y. *y is inverted. Anyway, do you have suggestions for those, as I am drawing a blank?Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
honey the codewitch wrote:
Anyway, do you have suggestions for those, as I am drawing a blank?
There's always abcissa and ordinate, but that's getting just a wee bit pedantic, in my opinion. I think that anyone familiar with the problem space would probably expect the use of x, y (and z) for cartesian coordinates. At the very least, they shouldn't be confused by it. Just as you wouldn't expect someone to be confused by the use of (theta,r) for polar coordinates, or F=m*a, etc.
Keep Calm and Carry On
-
Regarding your comments on my use of
xandy, I honestly can't think of a more descriptive name for them, as they translate directly to 2D cartesian coordinates*. In math that's x and y. *y is inverted. Anyway, do you have suggestions for those, as I am drawing a blank?Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
x and y it is (X and Y as properties) ... and often, accompanied by Left and Top. And you should be aware when they correspond. x and y can also simply mean displacements.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
-
Regarding your comments on my use of
xandy, I honestly can't think of a more descriptive name for them, as they translate directly to 2D cartesian coordinates*. In math that's x and y. *y is inverted. Anyway, do you have suggestions for those, as I am drawing a blank?Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
-
Regarding your comments on my use of
xandy, I honestly can't think of a more descriptive name for them, as they translate directly to 2D cartesian coordinates*. In math that's x and y. *y is inverted. Anyway, do you have suggestions for those, as I am drawing a blank?Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
-
honey the codewitch wrote:
Regarding your comments on my use of x and y
Me? I don't think I said anything about that.
I could have sworn you did, but sure enough you did not. :laugh: I can't find it on this thread, so I don't know where I got that. Sorry!
Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix
-
honey the codewitch wrote:
Regarding your comments on my use of x and y
Me? I don't think I said anything about that.
I assumed you saw something we didn't get to see, somehow.
"Before entering on an understanding, I have meditated for a long time, and have foreseen what might happen. It is not genius which reveals to me suddenly, secretly, what I have to say or to do in a circumstance unexpected by other people; it is reflection, it is meditation." - Napoleon I
