Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Artificial Intelligence
  3. GPU Query for CPAI & Blue Iris

GPU Query for CPAI & Blue Iris

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Artificial Intelligence
performancedatabasebusinesshelpquestion
2 Posts 2 Posters 9 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z Offline
    Z Offline
    Zz0K2
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hello everyone, I'm new to this forum and I'm currently in the midst of a decision-making process regarding the optimal GPU usage for running CPAI on Blue Iris, particularly for a single-camera setup at my home. The primary purpose is to detect human presence while effectively filtering out false triggers due to weather conditions. At present, I own a RTX 3080, which I'm considering repurposing for this task, especially since I'm contemplating an upgrade to one of the 4000 series super cards in the near future. However, I'm deliberating whether the 3080 might be overkill for my specific requirements. After substantial research and discussions on the Blue Iris forum, the consensus appears to be in favour of the GTX 1650. It's been recommended as a more than adequate solution for CPAI, offering sufficient processing speed while maintaining lower power consumption. My current setup relies solely on CPU processing, resulting in a latency of about 120-200ms for image processing. In contrast, I came across a post on the Blue Iris forum indicating that the GTX 1650 could potentially reduce this latency to around 30+ms. This substantial improvement naturally piques my interest. However, I can't help but wonder about the potential benefits of deploying my GTX 3080 for this purpose. Would there be a significant advantage in terms of processing speed or efficiency? I've noticed that a fellow member, MikeLud, is conducting tests with a GTX 4090, which adds another layer of curiosity regarding the performance spectrum of these GPUs. While I'm currently leaning towards the GTX 1650, primarily due to its power efficiency and seemingly adequate capabilities for my needs, I'm eager to hear your thoughts and experiences. Has anyone here used a GTX 3080/3080TI for a similar setup? If so, what were your observations regarding latency, power consumption, and overall performance? Your insights and any additional information you can provide would be greatly appreciated. I’m looking to make the most informed decision to ensure efficient and effective surveillance at my home. Thank you in advance for your valuable input! Best regards ;)

    S 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Z Zz0K2

      Hello everyone, I'm new to this forum and I'm currently in the midst of a decision-making process regarding the optimal GPU usage for running CPAI on Blue Iris, particularly for a single-camera setup at my home. The primary purpose is to detect human presence while effectively filtering out false triggers due to weather conditions. At present, I own a RTX 3080, which I'm considering repurposing for this task, especially since I'm contemplating an upgrade to one of the 4000 series super cards in the near future. However, I'm deliberating whether the 3080 might be overkill for my specific requirements. After substantial research and discussions on the Blue Iris forum, the consensus appears to be in favour of the GTX 1650. It's been recommended as a more than adequate solution for CPAI, offering sufficient processing speed while maintaining lower power consumption. My current setup relies solely on CPU processing, resulting in a latency of about 120-200ms for image processing. In contrast, I came across a post on the Blue Iris forum indicating that the GTX 1650 could potentially reduce this latency to around 30+ms. This substantial improvement naturally piques my interest. However, I can't help but wonder about the potential benefits of deploying my GTX 3080 for this purpose. Would there be a significant advantage in terms of processing speed or efficiency? I've noticed that a fellow member, MikeLud, is conducting tests with a GTX 4090, which adds another layer of curiosity regarding the performance spectrum of these GPUs. While I'm currently leaning towards the GTX 1650, primarily due to its power efficiency and seemingly adequate capabilities for my needs, I'm eager to hear your thoughts and experiences. Has anyone here used a GTX 3080/3080TI for a similar setup? If so, what were your observations regarding latency, power consumption, and overall performance? Your insights and any additional information you can provide would be greatly appreciated. I’m looking to make the most informed decision to ensure efficient and effective surveillance at my home. Thank you in advance for your valuable input! Best regards ;)

      S Offline
      S Offline
      Sernjijj Kabral
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Absolutely, blue Iris, and code dev, promotes sensual programming, once Kubernites is linux developed.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      Reply
      • Reply as topic
      Log in to reply
      • Oldest to Newest
      • Newest to Oldest
      • Most Votes


      • Login

      • Don't have an account? Register

      • Login or register to search.
      • First post
        Last post
      0
      • Categories
      • Recent
      • Tags
      • Popular
      • World
      • Users
      • Groups