ChatGPT goes temporarily “insane” with unexpected outputs, spooking users

[Kent Sharkey]

Ars Technica[^]:

Reddit user: "It's not just you, ChatGPT is having a stroke."

Even the AI can smell the burnt toast

I'd have gone with, "My mind is going. There is no question about it. I can feel it.", but I figured I'd give ol' HAL a rest for once.

[Nelek]

I wonder how many "ooops" moments have had most users before someone realizing that it really is spitting bullshit I was going to use:

Quote:

Dr. Alfred Lanning: [voiceover] There have always been ghosts in the machine. Random segments of code, that have grouped together to form unexpected protocols.

but that would actually be generous and nice for ChatGPT so I had to deprecate it.

M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

[obermd]

So we still don't have a stable "AI". ChatGPT lasted longer than previous attempts but it's still unstable.

[den2k88]

It's not an AI.

GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next