C++ must become safer
-
Not everything will be rewritten in Rust, so C++ must become safer, and we should all care about C++ becoming safer.
Or at least C++ developers must become safer
-
Not everything will be rewritten in Rust, so C++ must become safer, and we should all care about C++ becoming safer.
Or at least C++ developers must become safer
Kent Sharkey wrote:
Or at least C++ developers must become safer
Or managers should become aware of safety
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.
-
Not everything will be rewritten in Rust, so C++ must become safer, and we should all care about C++ becoming safer.
Or at least C++ developers must become safer
-
C++ safety is 100% in the hands of developers. The language itself, by design, is inherently unsafe.
I think I misread your post at first reading, as "(C++ safety is 100%) in the hands of developers". On the second reading, I realized that maybe your intention was "C++ safety is (100% in the hands of developers)". That sounds a lot more likely.
Religious freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make five.