Study backer: Catastrophic takes on Agile overemphasize new features
-
Users just want stuff that works. How hard can it be?
"Fast, good or cheap — pick two"
Shocking data: "Ali points to research (commissioned by himself) that shows British adults would much rather software worked properly than was chock full of new features." --- "Testing is kind of one of those tools that are there, but in order for testing to actually be able to work at all you need to know what you're testing. So you need good requirements to outline the non-functional requirements that are there." <-- can I get an 'amen'?
-
Users just want stuff that works. How hard can it be?
"Fast, good or cheap — pick two"
Shocking data: "Ali points to research (commissioned by himself) that shows British adults would much rather software worked properly than was chock full of new features." --- "Testing is kind of one of those tools that are there, but in order for testing to actually be able to work at all you need to know what you're testing. So you need good requirements to outline the non-functional requirements that are there." <-- can I get an 'amen'?
Article wrote:
Users just want stuff that works. How hard can it be?
Devs just want clear and binding requirements, how hard can it be?
M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.