Thanks, this helps

Elsie wrote: Is there any other un-conventional way other than calling SetWindowPos for each dialog Not that I know of, but it should be fairly simple to write your own cascading. Write a function that takes the type of window as parameter (typically CAutoDlg) and iterate over all your child frames/dialogs and position the ones inheriting from the supplied base type using IsKindOf(). home

My guess is that the exception you get is stack-overflow because some place in your code there is an indirect recursive call. Launch your application in a debugger and wait for the problem to happen, then you should be able diagnose what code is causing the problem.

Wrong. Of course you can get the source..

Could you solve your problem? BaseThreadStart is indicating that you are creating a new thread?

You can dynamically create 4 dialogs, here is to create a dynamically child dialog: // new a child dialog from the heap memory CRect rect; CChildDlg *pDlg=new CChildDlg(); // create a child dialog,and get the window rect. pDlg->Create(IDD_ChildDlg,NULL); pDlg->GetWindowRect(rect); // move it to point x =10, y =20 pDlg->MoveWindow(10,20,rect.bottom,rect.left,TRUE); // show and update the child window pDlg->ShowWindow(SW_SHOWNORMAL); pDlg->UpdateWindow(); pDlg = NULL;

In that case, I have no idea. I just covered the .NET managed method. A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^] Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP Visual Developer - Visual Basic      2006, 2007, 2008 But no longer in 2009...

There is no reasonable and fool proof way to make this check. You as a programmer must ensure that this never happens. Smart pointers can help you to an extent. «_Superman_» I love work. It gives me something to do between weekends.

Hi Guys, This same problem has driven me nuts but finally i fixed it and it is working. This is bug with MFC socket library that when inside a thread [other than main application thread], If we try to do something like CSocket socket; socket.Create(); It will throws an unhandled exception. I found an article on it See What Microsoft says about this that said something from Microsoft but that did not help me either. So here is a workaround i have found and i hope it can help some frustrated fellow like me. Inside thread, do this CSocket mySock; SOCKET sockethandle = socket(AF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP); mySock.m_hSocket= sockethandle; After that DO NOT call mySock.Create as it has been created already through assignment of socket handle. I am not sure if we can use mySock.Attach(sockethandle) as i did not try it yet. After that you can call Connect etc directly. When you are done using the socket, DO NOT call - rather call closesocket(mySock.m_hSocket); And that will free the socket object. If Attach works in above case then i guess we need to do Detach here when to free the socket. Good Luck Nauman Khan

So what does that tell you...you've got synchronisation problems somewhere in your code - multiple threads accessing the string simultaneously. You don't see the erroneous behaviour in the single-processor system because a single-processor system doesn't have real concurrency. You will need to track down where the issue is. Good luck...'cause you're going to need it... Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

Are you wanting to use NetRemoteTOD()? "Old age is like a bank account. You withdraw later in life what you have deposited along the way." - Unknown "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

CPtrList is not in c++, it is in vc++ sdfdsfsd

i need its source file Sujit Sahu (Cruel Handsome)

According to your answer to CPallini, your buffer contains a BMP file. So, wiki[^] should contain all the information you need to access the pixel data. Also look for BITMAPFILEHEADER, BITMAPINFO and such structures in MSDN, these should help too. You could for example use CreateDIBSection[^] to get a HBITMAP from your data and use it to feed it to a picture (static) control or draw it yourself. > The problem with computers is that they do what you tell them to do and not what you want them to do. < > Life: great graphics, but the gameplay sux. <

Thanks a lot, it was very helpful

yes, LBS_OWNERDRAWFIXED ,LBS_HASSTRINGS is being specified