Georgi, I agree with you. "Return in the middle" is an horror! X|

**************************** Strong congruence for strong people; with a compatible behaviour. For a semantical way of life.

Good, i thought it was bad coding

**************************** Strong congruence for strong people; with a compatible behaviour. For a semantical way of life.

"Lasciate ogni speranza o voi ch'entrate" Dante Alighieri private double m_EdgeDim; public double EdgeDim { set { m_EdgeDim = value; } } Don't you really want to see what you have put?

**************************** Strong congruence for strong people; with a compatible behaviour. For a semantical way of life.

Of course PIEBALD, it was a rethorical question ;) . The real question is how someone can have coded that one?

**************************** Strong congruence for strong people; with a compatible behaviour. For a semantical way of life.

modified on Wednesday, June 11, 2008 4:54 AM

private Pair<RefPoint3d> m_BoundingBox; public Pair<RefPoint3d> BoundingBox { get { **return BoundingBox**; } set { m_BoundingBox = value; } } Did you never define a property in this way? The run-time consequence is amazing: no exceptions at all, and sudden termination of the debug session when you are hovering the call at the property in your client module. PS: the error is inside the get property, because of the not voluntary recursive cycle it generates. PPS: I have no idea how this issue can be coded, the automatic refactoring of VS2005 should make impossible to code malware property.

**************************** Strong congruence for strong people; with a compatible behaviour. For a semantical way of life.

modified on Tuesday, June 10, 2008 10:22 AM