Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
N

Nick Katditsik

@Nick Katditsik
About
Posts
4
Topics
1
Shares
0
Groups
0
Followers
0
Following
0

Posts

Recent Best Controversial

  • Replacing back-end MS-ACCESS with SQL SERVER
    N Nick Katditsik

    Well, having multiple back-ends would do the job for some months more, but like you said, this is not a permanent solution.

    Database database question sql-server design

  • Replacing back-end MS-ACCESS with SQL SERVER
    N Nick Katditsik

    Well, I installed the SQL server and made the migration too. However, there are some problems with my source code: To open recordsets with DAO, I use Set rs = currentdb.OpenRecordset("test", dbOpenDynaset) which seems not to be ok with SQL server, since rs.FindFirst can't find anything. After some googling, I found out that I should change to: Set rs = currentdb.OpenRecordset("test", dbOpenDynaset, dbSeeChanges) so now i'm able to use rs.FindFirst, but i'm facing a new problem: Can't use rs.AddNew Any ideas? PS there are hundreds of thousands of code lines, so changing the way my software works is not an option. Like I said, I'm just trying to make things work as is.

    Database database question sql-server design

  • Replacing back-end MS-ACCESS with SQL SERVER
    N Nick Katditsik

    Actually I meant SQL Server (Microsoft), not SQL Lite. :)

    Database database question sql-server design

  • Replacing back-end MS-ACCESS with SQL SERVER
    N Nick Katditsik

    We use a legacy application (vb6 / access). The UI uses DAO to connect to the local front-end MDB file. Local tables are linked to the back-end mdb file which is located on the server. So far so well. The problem is that the back-end MDB is now 1,8 Gb and it will be 2 Gb pretty soon, which is fatal in MS-Access world. We're thinking of replacing the back-end db with sql server express, so we'll have to make minimal changes to the front-end databases (just the connection string). Is it a good idea? What is the correct procedure to import the back-end MDB to SQL server express? Which version (LocalDB etc) should we use? Thanks in advance. PS There is no option of making/buying a new application. We are trying to solve our problem with minimum effort.

    Database database question sql-server design
  • Login

  • Don't have an account? Register

  • Login or register to search.
  • First post
    Last post
0
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups