The C-2011 standard does not specify the epoch or the resolution of time(). The POSIX standard specifies the epoch as 1970-01-01 00:00:00, and the resolution as seconds. The fact that most runtime libraries follow the POSIX standard should not blind you to the fact that using this function to perform date arithmetic is inherently non-portable. If you wish to perform date/time manipulations, you should use the functions that operate on the 'tm' structure. If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

Something like that, but you can easily test it.

ramina sen wrote: I am using procedure as I have to collect all the parent I get from the inner query, How about putting that into a temporary table and work with that? Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]

correct, but as I have mention my inner query is giving me only parent but I want to make use of the result of the inner query again as input till I did not find any child ,so I am using procedure as I have to collect all the parent I get from the inner query and then update the outer query using the inner query result.it is the requirement what I want to achive, e.g update table A set A.a as "xyz" //here I will get t where A.id in ( select A.child_id from A,B,C --I get the child by passing parent as input and again consider the child as parent and find the child where A.id= b.id b.name = x and A.prent_id = ? //few join condtion here ) e.g input 1 result 1.1 input 1.1 result 1.1.1 input 1.1.1 result 1.1.1.1 update A where A.id in ('1.1','1.1.1','1.1.1.1')--here I want to use a container and make use of it Hope you get my intention now ..Thanks for your response.

An Introductory STL tutorial[^] http://www.google.co.in/search?hl=en&q=stl+tutorial&meta=&aq=3&oq=stl+[^] vikas da

Code it yourself. Allocate in the first instance release it in the last instance. your question implies that you need a lot of larning. :-O Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

Given that code is same how can DLL be faster then EXE. -Saurabh

critical section can be used to provide synchronization in single process only, so they are faster. Mutex can be used to provide synchronization among different processes..

Bisua wrote: costum controls(like styleish buttons) On Halloween CodeProject sends out stylish costume controls for free! :laugh: :laugh: Anyway, you should have a look at this section: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/buttons/[^]

You are not just an idiot, you also have a history of abusive behaviour towards people who actually want to help you but you're too stupid to realize that. Go away and stop polluting this forum.

May be you defined UNICODE in project settings and doesn't defined the entry point If so set Project Settings -> Link -> Output -> Entry-point = wWinMainCRTStartup aks

Have you accidentally hit CTL + to enlarge the font displayed - often the new larger font causes fixed forms to look screwy - things overlap. To test this, hit CTL -. Dave.

Code-o-mat wrote: ...not to mention the nice "redeclaration" and "multiple definition" errors you'd get. or even recursive inclusion ;) If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

You have cpp/h files and you imported these files to your project but it seems they dont work on your project.did you declare your variables of this class(I dont know its name) instead CButton class? (also more explain is helpful). ;)

If x is a member of the cpp1 class (what a bad name for a class) the you must have access to an instance of the cpp1 class in order to gain access to x. :) If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

Now excuse me sir! Have a think about it before you ask such foolish and useless questions. What bloody button code? Which bloody article? What was the response you got when you asked how to use the code on the page you downloaded it from? Is there not an example application that may be obtained from the article page? Like you said - if you can't ask a reasonable & sensible question, then just don't!:mad: