It was not a problem before, because the compiler did things that were not standard. But starting with Visual Studio 2005, the scope of the variables does not exceed the block they are defined in. And that applies to for loops too. So you either declare the index variable before the first for loop, or re-declare it in each for statement. As for the other problem, it's also an error with the old compiler. Your actual handler should return LRESULT, not void. So change the function to the requested signature (take a WPARAM and LPARAM and return LRESULT) and everything will be OK. BTW, there is no such thing as VS2006. There is VS2002, VS2003, VS2005 and VS2008.

Hi. I will try this. I think that is what I have been mixed up about. Thanks for the insight. Stan the man

For debug purposes... did you try to extend the retry (longer than 3 seconds)? Did you make sure the last attempt was finished, failed, and was cleaned up before you attempted to connect again? 3 seconds may not be enough time for the initial attempt to timeout... something to consider.

Where does m_pEndCoilThread come from? DOnt you mean m_pEndThread? ============================== Nothing to say.

Thanks! Stan the man

THank you everyone. That was the problem. Appreciate the help.

That was perfect, just want I need it. Thanks, Stan the man

Hi Iain. That did it. Thanks. Stan the man

Hamid. wrote: I have this address of you (NIBUTHOMAS@nestec.net) but it doesnt work. Sorry that's changed! Hamid. wrote: Well it was for new year I think its late for happy new year Happy new year to you too Hamid. :) Nibu thomas Microsoft MVP for VC++ Code must be written to be read, not by the compiler, but by another human being. Programming Blog: http://nibuthomas.wordpress.com

You can use of LoadIcon and then SetIcon?

I think there's a bit of an OO design issue going on here. Perhaps you need some data hiding... class CBase { public: virtual int AccessorFunctionThatDealsWithTest(); private: CTest m_test; }; class CDerived1 : public CBase { public: int AccessorFunctionThatDealsWithTest();//override of CBase virtual function private: CSomeOtherTest m_test; }; If you do this then it matters not if CTest and CSomeOtherTest are related, they can be but the 'user' of CBase:CDerived1 hierarchy doesn't have to know or care because the AccessorFunctionThatDealsWithTest() interface is the same even though its implementation might be entirely different. Now that makes me :-D Nothing is exactly what it seems but everything with seems can be unpicked.

Well, the keypad will be a dialog of sort (enable touchscreen capability). In this case, would you still think a static is not necessary and then just declare the kaypad class in the Edit class? Thanks. Stan

Hi, how did you create your font? There is two possibilities that more or less "ensures" you compatibility BOOL CreatePointFont( int nPointSize, LPCTSTR lpszFaceName, CDC* pDC = NULL ); but here the "int nPointSize" can depend on the MAPMODE, is not the same MM_TEXT as MM_LOMETRIC (for example) The other one (from Roger Allen's http://www.codeproject.com/printing/printingtricksandtips.asp[^]) CFont font; LOGFONT lf; ::ZeroMemory (&lf, sizeof (LOGFONT)); lf.lfHeight = -MulDiv (12, pDC->GetDeviceCaps (), 72); strcpy (lf.lfFaceName, "Arial"); //use the font if it works for printers, it should work for displays too. EDIT: I found this article. http://msdn2.microsoft.com/en-us/library/d8ws31ff(VS.71).aspx[^] I hope it helps Greetings. -------- M.D.V. If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?

Stan the man wrote: But when I call the class and this function exporting/using it from the DLL, it gives me warnings And what are those warnings ? Stan the man wrote: and does not work. Can you explain this ? Prasad Notifier using ATL | Operator new[],delete[][^]

I think you need to compile your software application as UNICODE enabled. Should work that way ...

See if this article is of any help. "Let us be thankful for the fools. But for them the rest of us could not succeed." - Mark Twain "We will be known forever by the tracks we leave." - Native American Proverb

For strict ANSI you should only use and assume the the most negative double representable is -DBL_MAX (the negative of DBL_MAX). This will result in -1.7976931348623158e+308, which is, in fact the most negative number that can be represented. This assumption is reasonable since the sign bit can always be used to represent any negative form of any positive number and vice-versa. Note, however, that the "resolution" is only of about 15 digits. This means that 10e20 + 1.0 will result in 10e20. And you can keep adding 1.0 and the result will never change from 10e20. So, it is important to note the difference between dynamic range (308 exponent) and resolution (about 15 decimal digits). Rilhas

Hi use a pointer to CAsyncSocket & use new to create a instant of socket then after close delete the old one and create new CAsyncSocket instant. it maybe work!:^) Iman Ghasrfakhri