I have not used it to actually debug an application at runtime, but rather used it when analyzing crash dumps from release builds, but I suppose that is possible too. The pdb file contains the symbol information needed to trace instructions back to source code. If the problem occurs infrequently, it might be better to go the crash dump analysis path. There is a discussion here[^] on how to do this. home

You are welcome. :) If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

Use GetSelectedItem[^] and compare it to your root HTREEITEM using GetRootItem[^] Also, wrapping code into <pre></pre> tags will make it more readable. home

Read each URL from the text file and pass it to your view. Or perhaps your question means something else. It's time for a new signature.

Once you have the pdb files suggested by another poster, you can refer to this link for a example. Windows Debuggers: Part 1: A WinDbg Tutorial[^]

Get rid of all drawing code in your OnTimer. Make sure OnPaint does all the drawing correctly and then replace all the code in OnTimer with: Invalidate(); That'll help sort out whether the problem is with the drawing code or whether you're committing another faux pas. In case you're wondering Invalidate tells Windows that the window you've called it on needs repainting and it should send a WM_PAINT to the app when the message queue is otherwise empty. This WM_PAINT causes OnPaint to be called. Cheers, Ash

You waited 89 minutes before posting the same question again. Why so impatient? This forum is read by folks from around the globe. Give them a chance to see your question before reposting. "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons "Man who follows car will be exhausted." - Confucius

I assume you're drawing in your WM_PAINT[^] handler? Steve

AFAIK, we cannot use a normal member function of a class as a thread. there is a different procedure for this, let me remember. but as a temporary solution, i can suggest you to use ThreadFunc as a global function and see. good luck. -------------------------------------------- Suggestion to the members: Please prefix your main thread subject with [SOLVED] if it is solved. thanks. chandu.

How can you even compile your code (there are a lot of errors)? The following one works properly #include <windows.h> class SimpleThread { static DWORD WINAPI ThreadFunc(LPVOID p) { while(1) { printf("Test"); } } public: void SimpleThread::Start() { DWORD dwThreadId, dwThrdParam = 1; HANDLE threadHandle; threadHandle = CreateThread( NULL, 0, ThreadFunc, &dwThrdParam, 0, &dwThreadId); } }; void main() { SimpleThread t; t.Start(); while (1); } :) If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile. This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke [My articles]

You are responsible for deleting the pointer objects yourself. Another approach is to use a reference-counted smart pointer like boost::shared_ptr. Pax Domini sit semper vobiscum

My answer above told you exactly why WaitForSingleObject() solved the problem However, the thread code you show runs in the context of a larger program, notably the main thread which created the thread you show. What is that thread doing? If it exits, it will take the created thread down with it.

VVVimal wrote: Is this a good approach No, that will not even compile. I would recommend converting to FILETIME structure with the SystemTimeToFileTime Function[^] and then to ULARGE_INTEGER Union[^] and compare the QuadPart. Best Wishes, -David Delaune

SYSTEMTIME t1; SYSTEMTIME t2; GetSystemTime(&t1); GetSystemTime(&t2); CTime tme1(&t1); CTime tme2(&t2); tme1 == tme2 ? TRUE : FALSE;

No, it's not the best way - the best way would be to define an operator== for Student, then use the operator== defined for std::list. Also - isn't the 'name' member a std::string? In which case that has an operator== Anyway - I'd do this: class Student { public: std::string name; int age; friend bool operator==(Student const& left, Student const& right) { return left.age==right.age && left.name==right.name; } }; std::list<Student> _studentList1; std::list<Student> _studentList2; Then in code, I could do if (_studentList1 == _studentList2) Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p

Set the filter in the createTreeWalker method call. VVVimal wrote: you also mentioned "From the root node, apply an XPath of "//Locomotive " what does it mean Using an XPath[^] library such as Xalan[^] or XQilla[^], you apply an XPath evaluator class to the DOM. That will give you an iterator that'll go through the nodes that match the XPath expression you gave to the XPath evaluator. Read up on XPath - it's a very useful tool to know how to use. Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p