Hahaha, yes, that's sad but very very true indeed! All too true if you ask me. :((

He was not a dumb ass he was a lazy ass.

Well, I'm going through this programmable data pump and trying to get a hang of it, but the butcher that put it together's really got me goin' nuts, cause whenever I think some piece of code has secret purpose behind it and put some time into investigating what the heck it's doin' I end up looking at something like this: if(sNewMaintStatus==null) { Handler.execute(ixhandler, ixEvent, sSourceConnectionName, sDestinationConnectionName,sNewSpirnum, sSourceUser, sDestUser); } else if((sNewMaintStatus.equals("PARTIAL")) || sNewMaintStatus.equals("") || sNewMaintStatus.equals(null)) { Handler.execute(ixhandler, ixEvent, sSourceConnectionName, sDestinationConnectionName,sNewSpirnum, sSourceUser, sDestUser); } Which translates to: if (A=true) Execute block 1 else if (B=true || A=true || A=true) Execute block 1 Which in normal language translates to if (A=true || B=true) Execute block 1 So I called my boss, and I told him, listen man, this's a discrase, client's complainin' bout' the performance and reliablility and so on and he said IF IT AIN'T BROKEN WELL DON'T FIX IT :omg: ;P :wtf: Now does that sound familiar to you? Well, I had to share the pain!

Nonononono! The catch is that the total number of cents is not based on 100 cents as the name suggests. It's rather based on a variable number usually several times higher. Now, when your boss asks you how the project's goin' you should always smile:cool: and say well, I've completed XX% where XX is >> 50. And as you approach 100, the newly arrived issues will add to the total number of cents, thus increasing total over the suggested name. The important thing is to keep smiling, looking cool and in control, optimistic above all, lookin' good boss, lookin' good!