<i>This</i> is twisted...
-
Chris Maunder wrote: Finally everyone gets to point and laugh at someone else who posted a re-run. :-( I didnt see the first one :-( Chris Maunder wrote: friend sent me this in response to a rerun Nice... Bow wow wow, Yippee yo yippee yay, My miniputt high, Is now 30 yay.
-
Nish [BusterBoy] wrote: Bow wow wow, Yippee yo yippee yay, My miniputt high, Is now 30 yay. Only 30?! I got 45 on my first game and 47 on my second... Isaac Sasson, Small time programmer - complainer at large. Sonork ID 100.13704
Isaac Sasson wrote: Only 30?! I got 45 on my first game and 47 on my second... Ah Ah. You are not foolin me again with those high-score tricks. I am an experienced golfer now who knows exactly how to count score. I even know that 18 means _MAX in golf scoring. Nish Bow wow wow, Yippee yo yippee yay, My miniputt high, Is now 30 yay.
-
Check this out. J
Jamie Hale wrote: Check this out. Whether this is a re-post (using the word re-run just seems sick in the context) or not that is just... well it is just... *shakes my head*... no words really. How can you sit for days on end with a guy bleeding to death in your garage crying for help and all you do is say sorry? I mean, sure she was probably scared out of her wits but... but that is no damned excuse. Man, that is bizarre. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge Sonork ID: 100.9903 Stormfront
-
Geez!!! What a TOTAL BITCH! Nish Bow wow wow, Yippee yo yippee yay, My miniputt high, Is now 30 yay.
-
Check this out. J
This proves that human nature can be extremely cruel :( She deserves dead penalty for this horrendous crime. And the fucking stupid lawyer says: Mallard's attorney, Mike Heiskell, said: "I think this is overreaching on the part of the prosecution and the police and, in the end, I believe the law will shake out that this was simply a case of failure to stop and render aid." Unbelievable :mad: He must be kidding, or else he too deserves to go to jail, the scumbag :mad: Joao Vaz
-
Check this out. J
-
Check this out. J
Twist her neck X| X| X| X| :eek: Bizarre to the core...She is a m*ron:mad: Atul Dharne
-
This proves that human nature can be extremely cruel :( She deserves dead penalty for this horrendous crime. And the fucking stupid lawyer says: Mallard's attorney, Mike Heiskell, said: "I think this is overreaching on the part of the prosecution and the police and, in the end, I believe the law will shake out that this was simply a case of failure to stop and render aid." Unbelievable :mad: He must be kidding, or else he too deserves to go to jail, the scumbag :mad: Joao Vaz
Joao Vaz wrote: This proves that human nature can be extremely cruel This proves only that people react in unbelievable ways to things that shock them. I think that the woman had big psycological problems after the accident, and she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness. She didn't help the man, she tried to hide the body, but then she didn't try to hide or destroy her car, or, at least, fix the damages to hide the fact that it had an accident. She deserves dead penalty for this horrendous crime. Killing her will be just another crime, IMHO, and will not give back life to her victim. She deserves a punishment for her acts, but you've to understand if she was understanding what she was doing. And she should be helped to recover herself, if this is possibile. I think that the worst aspect of human nature is the one shown by her lawyer. Vuemme
-
Joao Vaz wrote: This proves that human nature can be extremely cruel This proves only that people react in unbelievable ways to things that shock them. I think that the woman had big psycological problems after the accident, and she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness. She didn't help the man, she tried to hide the body, but then she didn't try to hide or destroy her car, or, at least, fix the damages to hide the fact that it had an accident. She deserves dead penalty for this horrendous crime. Killing her will be just another crime, IMHO, and will not give back life to her victim. She deserves a punishment for her acts, but you've to understand if she was understanding what she was doing. And she should be helped to recover herself, if this is possibile. I think that the worst aspect of human nature is the one shown by her lawyer. Vuemme
Vuemme wrote: I think that the woman had big psycological problems after the accident, and she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness. What! :omg: It's that so ! Wow, I see, the lawyer will invoke mental insanity, bahh , this doesn't excuse her totally unacceptable behaviour. OH yeah and their friends just help her to hide the body, she left the guy 2 nights alive on the garage, great crazyness, ah ? ;P Vuemme wrote: Killing her will be just another crime I personlly don't favor the dead penalty ,except in very extreme cases, and in this case so the conservative catholic church. Here in Portugal the max time you can spent on jail is 25 years ... Vuemme wrote: And she should be helped to recover herself, if this is possibile Vuemme , this shows 2 posibilities : one , you're are a very naive person , or second, a truly good person. I believe more that you're on 2º part of the sentence. :) Vuemme wrote: I think that the worst aspect of human nature is the one shown by her lawyer On this I agree with you, the lawyer is a ... :rolleyes: Peace :rose: Joao Vaz
-
Joao Vaz wrote: Nish [BusterBoy] wrote: BITCH! This wasn't censured Censured? That seems kind of harsh. Maybe they could just change the offending word in the post, like B****! Regards, Dan
-
Jamie Hale wrote: Check this out. Whether this is a re-post (using the word re-run just seems sick in the context) or not that is just... well it is just... *shakes my head*... no words really. How can you sit for days on end with a guy bleeding to death in your garage crying for help and all you do is say sorry? I mean, sure she was probably scared out of her wits but... but that is no damned excuse. Man, that is bizarre. regards, Paul Watson Bluegrass Cape Town, South Africa "The greatest thing you will ever learn is to love, and be loved in return" - Moulin Rouge Sonork ID: 100.9903 Stormfront
Paul Watson wrote: I mean, sure she was probably scared out of her wits but... but that is no damned excuse. Shock can make you do weird things, and all the worse if you are psycologicaly challenged. It is a sad case, but not just for the victim. ________________ David Wulff http://www.davidwulff.co.uk Sonork ID: 100.9977 Dave …
-
Chris Maunder wrote: Finally everyone gets to point and laugh at someone else who posted a re-run. :-( I didnt see the first one :-( Chris Maunder wrote: friend sent me this in response to a rerun Nice... Bow wow wow, Yippee yo yippee yay, My miniputt high, Is now 30 yay.
I know, it can be hard to sort through that many posts -:suss:Matt Newman:suss: -Sonork ID: 100.11179:BestSnowman
† -
Joao Vaz wrote: This proves that human nature can be extremely cruel This proves only that people react in unbelievable ways to things that shock them. I think that the woman had big psycological problems after the accident, and she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness. She didn't help the man, she tried to hide the body, but then she didn't try to hide or destroy her car, or, at least, fix the damages to hide the fact that it had an accident. She deserves dead penalty for this horrendous crime. Killing her will be just another crime, IMHO, and will not give back life to her victim. She deserves a punishment for her acts, but you've to understand if she was understanding what she was doing. And she should be helped to recover herself, if this is possibile. I think that the worst aspect of human nature is the one shown by her lawyer. Vuemme
>> she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness does this make you not responsible for what you did? trying to burn the seat, not driving the car anymore doesn't sound like an act of shock. She just didn't realize what she did, otherwise she'd be more silent about. OK, it makes a good story at certain parties... But that's no excuse. I don't believe punishing her (in any way) will help, but she shouldn't get away with this. I would have said 5 years emergency room might help, but she's a nurse aide, heck!
-
>> she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness does this make you not responsible for what you did? trying to burn the seat, not driving the car anymore doesn't sound like an act of shock. She just didn't realize what she did, otherwise she'd be more silent about. OK, it makes a good story at certain parties... But that's no excuse. I don't believe punishing her (in any way) will help, but she shouldn't get away with this. I would have said 5 years emergency room might help, but she's a nurse aide, heck!
peterchen wrote: >> she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness does this make you not responsible for what you did? Everybody knows that driving when you're drunk is dangerous and unsafe, she made a big mistake and she has responsibilities for that. But after the accident she "losed her mind", or something like that... You are responsible of what you did if you can understood what you were doing. In this case you deserve a punishment (and the main goal of jail should be to made people ready to come back into the "normal" society). If you were acting without full control of your actions you have to be helped to recover yourself and maybe isolated from other poeple to avoid other actions of this kind until you're recovered. peterchen wrote: trying to burn the seat, not driving the car anymore doesn't sound like an act of shock. She just didn't realize what she did, otherwise she'd be more silent about. OK, it makes a good story at certain parties... But that's no excuse. You've to agree that she didn't acted in a rational way. She can hide all the evidence (and she's not related in any way to the victim, so it would have been very difficult to suspect her), but she confusely tried to hide only part of it. And she spoke about the accident with other people. I think that this is the kind of situations nobody wants to be involved in (nor as the victim, nor as the murderer). She saw her life changing in a matter of seconds, and this could have shocking effect on people. Some people react in the right ("good"?) way (do their better to minimize the damage they inflict to others and accept the consequences of their actions), other in the bad way (try only to protected themselves and to avoid "punishment"). She reacted in a "mad" way (does the worst for the victim and also for herself). If she had dumped the man immediatly after the accident and destroyed or fixed her car to hide the evidence, she would have been even more "cruel" in my opinion...
-
Vuemme wrote: I think that the woman had big psycological problems after the accident, and she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness. What! :omg: It's that so ! Wow, I see, the lawyer will invoke mental insanity, bahh , this doesn't excuse her totally unacceptable behaviour. OH yeah and their friends just help her to hide the body, she left the guy 2 nights alive on the garage, great crazyness, ah ? ;P Vuemme wrote: Killing her will be just another crime I personlly don't favor the dead penalty ,except in very extreme cases, and in this case so the conservative catholic church. Here in Portugal the max time you can spent on jail is 25 years ... Vuemme wrote: And she should be helped to recover herself, if this is possibile Vuemme , this shows 2 posibilities : one , you're are a very naive person , or second, a truly good person. I believe more that you're on 2º part of the sentence. :) Vuemme wrote: I think that the worst aspect of human nature is the one shown by her lawyer On this I agree with you, the lawyer is a ... :rolleyes: Peace :rose: Joao Vaz
Joao Vaz wrote: What! It's that so ! Wow, I see, the lawyer will invoke mental insanity, bahh , this doesn't excuse her totally unacceptable behaviour. OH yeah and their friends just help her to hide the body, she left the guy 2 nights alive on the garage, great crazyness, ah ? I said that this was unrational behaviour, not acceptable behaviour. Joao Vaz wrote: Vuemme , this shows 2 posibilities : one , you're are a very naive person , or second, a truly good person. I believe more that you're on 2º part of the sentence. I'm someone who never got involved in this kind of situation and hopes to never get into this kind of situation during his life. And if I can choose, I prefer to be runned down than to live the rest of my life with the idea of being responsible of someone else's death (and for something so stupid like a couple of drink more at a party). I'm not sure about how I would react in this kind of situation, and nobody can. I think that the aspects of human nature that this history shows are madness and fear, not cruelty. Dumping the body immediately after the accident and destroy all the evidence (and not simply keep the car hidden inside your garage) would have been an even more cruel behaviour, but also a more rational one.
-
peterchen wrote: >> she acted in a completely meaningless way not for cruelty, but for crazyness does this make you not responsible for what you did? Everybody knows that driving when you're drunk is dangerous and unsafe, she made a big mistake and she has responsibilities for that. But after the accident she "losed her mind", or something like that... You are responsible of what you did if you can understood what you were doing. In this case you deserve a punishment (and the main goal of jail should be to made people ready to come back into the "normal" society). If you were acting without full control of your actions you have to be helped to recover yourself and maybe isolated from other poeple to avoid other actions of this kind until you're recovered. peterchen wrote: trying to burn the seat, not driving the car anymore doesn't sound like an act of shock. She just didn't realize what she did, otherwise she'd be more silent about. OK, it makes a good story at certain parties... But that's no excuse. You've to agree that she didn't acted in a rational way. She can hide all the evidence (and she's not related in any way to the victim, so it would have been very difficult to suspect her), but she confusely tried to hide only part of it. And she spoke about the accident with other people. I think that this is the kind of situations nobody wants to be involved in (nor as the victim, nor as the murderer). She saw her life changing in a matter of seconds, and this could have shocking effect on people. Some people react in the right ("good"?) way (do their better to minimize the damage they inflict to others and accept the consequences of their actions), other in the bad way (try only to protected themselves and to avoid "punishment"). She reacted in a "mad" way (does the worst for the victim and also for herself). If she had dumped the man immediatly after the accident and destroyed or fixed her car to hide the evidence, she would have been even more "cruel" in my opinion...
Shw drove drunk & drugged, and didn't aceept the consequences of that. for two or three days. I know how such an accident can make you cross the border, esp. if you grow up in an "engineer your life, shit can't happen to me" environment. but shock is a reason for stupidity, as much as hunger is a reason for stealing. I do assume she was not intentionally cruel, just "disabled". The best I could say about her is that she took social incompetence to a new level. "Hide it, and it will go away" is no solution, esp. not of a nurse aide towards an injured. Noone should get away with that. OK, likely she's scarred for life. Maybe she'll go downhill without any help. And of course it would be nice if "the society" finds a way to help her, instead of just punishing. But this expects more from the society towards her, than she was willing or "mentally able" to do for the society. And "mentally inable" is so much overrated nowadays - while "writers block" made it's way into common terms, we would laugh at the idea of a "plumbers block". That's what I had to say. I can understand what she did, what happened, and how she feels. But this can by no means justify it.