Raging ragheads in London
-
I see the guy who dressed up as a suicide bomber has apologised: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4686410.stm[^] Which is better than nothing I guess - mind you, he is probably shitting himself that the police are gonna come and kick his door in...
Strange: this morning he was utterly unapologetic and felt that he'd done nothing wrong. Wanker.
turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice
-
I see the guy who dressed up as a suicide bomber has apologised: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4686410.stm[^] Which is better than nothing I guess - mind you, he is probably shitting himself that the police are gonna come and kick his door in...
-
Strange: this morning he was utterly unapologetic and felt that he'd done nothing wrong. Wanker.
turning the other cheek just gets you slapped twice
-
I propose standing up for our liberal tolerant society and upholding the rule of law. People need to be dealt with under the law. Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde
farmer giles wrote:
standing up for our liberal tolerant society
See sig...
farmer giles wrote:
People need to be dealt with under the law.
A defense of the law is all anyone is asking for. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
I see the guy who dressed up as a suicide bomber has apologised: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4686410.stm[^] Which is better than nothing I guess - mind you, he is probably shitting himself that the police are gonna come and kick his door in...
"I do not condone these murderous acts, do not support terrorism or extremism and would like to apologise unreservedly and wholeheartedly to the families of the victims." If he really believes that, why did he dress up as a sucide bomber in the first place? By dress ing up as a terrorist, was he not condoning terrorism? I think he is full of BS. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking" Kim0618 wrote: "the father of Bush's mother is also Bush's mother" -- modified at 11:33 Monday 6th February, 2006
-
farmer giles wrote:
standing up for our liberal tolerant society
See sig...
farmer giles wrote:
People need to be dealt with under the law.
A defense of the law is all anyone is asking for. "You get that which you tolerate"
Stan Shannon wrote:
A defense of the law is all anyone is asking for.
That's rubbish the post calls for muslim women to be forcably disrobed and the men to be shot. The post itself is illegal. You don't defend the law by breaking it. "I propose the police walk up to her, rip the thing off, take a photo, and leg it. That ought to inflame the f*** out of the wanker rag heads in no time. And as for the rest, shoot the f***kers. " - this is not defending the law it's condoning it being broken. Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde -- modified at 12:13 Monday 6th February, 2006
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
A defense of the law is all anyone is asking for.
That's rubbish the post calls for muslim women to be forcably disrobed and the men to be shot. The post itself is illegal. You don't defend the law by breaking it. "I propose the police walk up to her, rip the thing off, take a photo, and leg it. That ought to inflame the f*** out of the wanker rag heads in no time. And as for the rest, shoot the f***kers. " - this is not defending the law it's condoning it being broken. Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde -- modified at 12:13 Monday 6th February, 2006
The only offense I take at those comments is the "leg it" part. If these people are breaking the law the law should be enforced. They should be photographed - even the women, and if they refuse to disperse, they should be dealt with accordingly, including being shot if they become violent. That is defending the law. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
farmer giles wrote:
This is racist crap
No it is not. I am not racist, ot culturalist, or religionist, or ist anything. I am p'ist off though seeing the streets of the capitol of one of the worlds finest coutries degraded by posters like these. We have very strict laws in the UK and incitement to vioence and murder is a very serious crime. And the state should crack down on this really hard. Shit, we wouldnt suffer this if it was a BNP march! These extremeists (and I have constantly argued on this forum not to mistake their beliefs for Islam) need controling. If their culture cant do it then, while they are in our culture, it is up to us to control them. And, if they threaten our culture from abroad, it is up to us then to control them then too. We arent talking about some existentialist issue here, we are talking about very disturbed people killing YOUR friends and family. Nunc est bibendum
fat_boy wrote:
we wouldnt suffer this if it was a BNP march!
Now the other week 2 BNP people were procecuted, they were aquited on half the charges, but the jury could not decide on the others, so there is to be a re trial. I think one of the things they were 'procecuted' for and the jury did not agree was the statement that they thought Islam was a violent religion, will be intersing to see what happens at the retrial.
"Normal is getting dressed in clothes that you buy for work and driving through traffic in a car that you are still paying for - in order to get to the job you need to pay for the clothes and the car, and the house you leave vacant all day so you can afford to live in it." - Ellen Goodman
-
fat_boy wrote:
the filth
How wonderful it is that you can refer to the police in this obscene manner and not get your head kicked in for your trouble. Reminds me of a story a guy I work with was telling. He used to work in Iraq as a safety consultant. He was doing an inspection of some facility and spoted a car parked where it shouldn't. As it was obstructing something, I can't remember what, he said that the car should be moved. The guards that were accompanying him asked if they should beat up the driver for parking in the wrong place. What a difference in culture!
-Weasels are as curious as raccoons. They look under every bush and sneak into holes. - I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. --Voltaire (1694-1778)
-
fat_boy wrote:
the filth
How wonderful it is that you can refer to the police in this obscene manner and not get your head kicked in for your trouble. Reminds me of a story a guy I work with was telling. He used to work in Iraq as a safety consultant. He was doing an inspection of some facility and spoted a car parked where it shouldn't. As it was obstructing something, I can't remember what, he said that the car should be moved. The guards that were accompanying him asked if they should beat up the driver for parking in the wrong place. What a difference in culture!
-Weasels are as curious as raccoons. They look under every bush and sneak into holes. - I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. --Voltaire (1694-1778)
-
The only offense I take at those comments is the "leg it" part. If these people are breaking the law the law should be enforced. They should be photographed - even the women, and if they refuse to disperse, they should be dealt with accordingly, including being shot if they become violent. That is defending the law. "You get that which you tolerate"
Stan Shannon wrote:
including being shot if they become violent
Maybe in your country, in London which is where he's talking about the police just arrest people, take them down the police station and then charge them. I'd fully support those actions if people are breaking the law but not disrobing the women (and then running away!) and shooting the men. That's what he is calling for and calling for that is against the law in our country just as much as what some of the protestors are doing. As for other protestors who do so peacefully and merely express different views about the limits of free speech I fully support their right to do this and if you support free speech as you claim to do then so should you. Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde
-
I think the point was that you wanted the wonmen forcably unveiled and the men shot. Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde
farmer giles wrote:
think the point was that you wanted the wonmen forcably unveiled and the men shot.
And the problem is.....? Richard Suppose you were an idiot... And suppose you were a member of Congress... But I repeat myself. --Mark Twain
-
Stan Shannon wrote:
including being shot if they become violent
Maybe in your country, in London which is where he's talking about the police just arrest people, take them down the police station and then charge them. I'd fully support those actions if people are breaking the law but not disrobing the women (and then running away!) and shooting the men. That's what he is calling for and calling for that is against the law in our country just as much as what some of the protestors are doing. As for other protestors who do so peacefully and merely express different views about the limits of free speech I fully support their right to do this and if you support free speech as you claim to do then so should you. Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde
farmer giles wrote:
As for other protestors who do so peacefully and merely express different views about the limits of free speech I fully support their right to do this and if you support free speech as you claim to do then so should you.
Of course. But surely it is just as illegal for the Muslims to call for violence as for anyone else to - even if they are doing it "peacefully". These people are demanding limits upon free speech in your society because it offends them, it hardly seems out of line to suggest that their own speech is offensive and should not be tolerated. "You get that which you tolerate"
-
farmer giles wrote:
As for other protestors who do so peacefully and merely express different views about the limits of free speech I fully support their right to do this and if you support free speech as you claim to do then so should you.
Of course. But surely it is just as illegal for the Muslims to call for violence as for anyone else to - even if they are doing it "peacefully". These people are demanding limits upon free speech in your society because it offends them, it hardly seems out of line to suggest that their own speech is offensive and should not be tolerated. "You get that which you tolerate"
I've never defended people calling for violence. That's why I'm arguing against the post. I'm fully in favour of protestors calling for violence being arrested and dealt with by the law. What I'm opposed to is calls to summarily execute people. Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde
-
This is racist crap. This is exactly the attitude that the extremists want to push you into.
fat_boy wrote:
I propose the police walk up to her, rip the thing off, take a photo, and leg it.
What kind of a knock down ginger for the police force? FB you need to grow up, come back in ten years time. Are you gonna bark all, day little doggy. Or are you gonna bite. - Mr Blonde -- modified at 7:00 Monday 6th February, 2006
People like you seem to get more angry at people who try to defend themselves form muslime terrorists than you do at the terrorists themselves. "When only the police have guns, it's called a Police State."
-
Close your borders. Jam all incoming electrogmagnetic waves. Cut all incoming cable. Destroy all satellite receivers. Burn all ships and aeroplanes not used for domestic travel. Blow up incoming railways. Toss out anyone who doesn't have 5 generations of Dutch blood. Remove all foreign artifacts from your museums and libraries. Turn all foreign embassies into low-rent housing. Ban personal radios. Build a wall around your country. Re-educate your citizens. regards, Paul Watson Ireland Feed Henry! K(arl) wrote: oh, and BTW, CHRISTIAN ISN'T A PARADOX, HE IS A TASMANIAN!
Wow - that's pretty good stuff there, Paul! Regards, Nish
-
fat_boy wrote:
My wife was in the filth too.
Ooohhh!! You dirty bugger! :laugh:
-Weasels are as curious as raccoons. They look under every bush and sneak into holes. - I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. --Voltaire (1694-1778)