Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. My issue with global warming

My issue with global warming

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
helpadobequestionworkspace
14 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Q QuiJohn

    I consider myself a staunch environmentalist--it is usually my top concern when it comes to political issues. I believe someone needs to look out for the environment, because people and companies tend not to. I am also a born skeptic, so much of the global warming hoopla drives me absolutely insane. Whether or not humans are contributing to global warming is largely irrelevant--there are enough local repurcussions of pollution that we should have the strictest possible laws about it anyway. Calling it "global warming" lets people believe it's someone else's problem. They think that one little car or one little factory can't make much of a global impact. And they're right! But it can destroy their local waterways and the breathable air in their own town. Have you driven through Gary, Indiana lately? So what does it even matter if global warming is "real" or not? Look at *local* climate change, which is undeniably real and many times scarier.

    J Offline
    J Offline
    Jeremy Falcon
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    David Kentley wrote:

    But it can destroy their local waterways and the breathable air in their own town.

    Amen to that. One of the things that surprised me when moving to New Orleans was that they do not require an emissions test for your vehicle's inspection sticker. There are some states - like Tennessee - that don't even require the sticker! What gives? Jeremy Falcon

    K 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Jeremy Falcon

      David Kentley wrote:

      But it can destroy their local waterways and the breathable air in their own town.

      Amen to that. One of the things that surprised me when moving to New Orleans was that they do not require an emissions test for your vehicle's inspection sticker. There are some states - like Tennessee - that don't even require the sticker! What gives? Jeremy Falcon

      K Offline
      K Offline
      kgaddy
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      I think the emissions test is a huge scam. 100% of cars produced today (for sale in the US) are within federal limits. The very few that are not are so small as to not make a diffrence and will likely be put to the boneyard soon. The fact that I have to pay 20$ here in MO. to test my 2001 Honda, which they know is within limits is crazy. I think it's a way for the state to get extra money. Also, has anyone seen those "mobile" inspection vans on the highway? They supposedly test you as you enter the freeway. Do you really think that is a accurate test? My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"

      J J S 3 Replies Last reply
      0
      • K kgaddy

        I think the emissions test is a huge scam. 100% of cars produced today (for sale in the US) are within federal limits. The very few that are not are so small as to not make a diffrence and will likely be put to the boneyard soon. The fact that I have to pay 20$ here in MO. to test my 2001 Honda, which they know is within limits is crazy. I think it's a way for the state to get extra money. Also, has anyone seen those "mobile" inspection vans on the highway? They supposedly test you as you enter the freeway. Do you really think that is a accurate test? My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"

        J Offline
        J Offline
        jasontg
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        Just because a car was produced within emission limits, does not mean that it will stay that way. There are mechanical problems that can cause the emissions to increase and there are also people who like to remove their catalytic converter. -J


        Think of a computer program. Somewhere, there is one key instruction, and everything else is just functions calling themselves, or brackets billowing out endlessly through an infinite address space. What happens when the brackets collapse? Where's the final 'end if'? Is any of this making sense? -Ford Prefect

        K 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J jasontg

          Just because a car was produced within emission limits, does not mean that it will stay that way. There are mechanical problems that can cause the emissions to increase and there are also people who like to remove their catalytic converter. -J


          Think of a computer program. Somewhere, there is one key instruction, and everything else is just functions calling themselves, or brackets billowing out endlessly through an infinite address space. What happens when the brackets collapse? Where's the final 'end if'? Is any of this making sense? -Ford Prefect

          K Offline
          K Offline
          kgaddy
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          My problem is with the testing itself. "The city of Denver abandoned this test after discovering that 70% of the cars that failed their inspection were in fact perfectly clean. That didn't keep their owners from having to perform expensive repairs, though. " http://www.reasontofreedom.com/Emission_Testing.html My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"

          Q 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • K kgaddy

            I think the emissions test is a huge scam. 100% of cars produced today (for sale in the US) are within federal limits. The very few that are not are so small as to not make a diffrence and will likely be put to the boneyard soon. The fact that I have to pay 20$ here in MO. to test my 2001 Honda, which they know is within limits is crazy. I think it's a way for the state to get extra money. Also, has anyone seen those "mobile" inspection vans on the highway? They supposedly test you as you enter the freeway. Do you really think that is a accurate test? My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Jeremy Falcon
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            kgaddy wrote:

            I think the emissions test is a huge scam.

            You should try driving in a city that doesn't require one. :) You can litteraly smell the difference. Jeremy Falcon

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • J Jeremy Falcon

              kgaddy wrote:

              I think the emissions test is a huge scam.

              You should try driving in a city that doesn't require one. :) You can litteraly smell the difference. Jeremy Falcon

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Red Stateler
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              You sure that's not just the garbage lining New Orleans' streets?

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K kgaddy

                My problem is with the testing itself. "The city of Denver abandoned this test after discovering that 70% of the cars that failed their inspection were in fact perfectly clean. That didn't keep their owners from having to perform expensive repairs, though. " http://www.reasontofreedom.com/Emission_Testing.html My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"

                Q Offline
                Q Offline
                QuiJohn
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                kgaddy wrote:

                "The city of Denver abandoned this test after discovering that 70% of the cars that failed their inspection were in fact perfectly clean. That didn't keep their owners from having to perform expensive repairs, though. "

                I heard of the opposite problem, where inspection stations would tune your car so that it would pass, charge you the $20, then untune it so it would run the way you want. I still think emissions testing is a good idea, but they need to make it about emissions rather than just taking the $20.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Red Stateler

                  You sure that's not just the garbage lining New Orleans' streets?

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jeremy Falcon
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  I was living here before the hurricane hit ya know. :) Jeremy Falcon

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jeremy Falcon

                    I was living here before the hurricane hit ya know. :) Jeremy Falcon

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Red Stateler
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    I visited a couple times before the hurricane. The streets were lined with garbage then too. I love New Orleans, though. I want to go back and visit once it's all cleaned up.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Red Stateler

                      I visited a couple times before the hurricane. The streets were lined with garbage then too. I love New Orleans, though. I want to go back and visit once it's all cleaned up.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jeremy Falcon
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      espeir wrote:

                      The streets were lined with garbage then too.

                      It's not the cleanest place on Earth. :laugh: But, I know the difference in smell between exhaust and garbage.

                      espeir wrote:

                      I love New Orleans, though. I want to go back and visit once it's all cleaned up.

                      It's a great place. My biggest complaints are the roads and air quality. There's the crime too, but that's usually drug related. Just say no. Overall the atmosphere is great, the people are friendly (well ok not everyone, but I've stayed at complete strangers homes before with them not there and only after knowing me for a few hours), and we have more booze flowing than water. :) Jeremy Falcon

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • K kgaddy

                        I think the emissions test is a huge scam. 100% of cars produced today (for sale in the US) are within federal limits. The very few that are not are so small as to not make a diffrence and will likely be put to the boneyard soon. The fact that I have to pay 20$ here in MO. to test my 2001 Honda, which they know is within limits is crazy. I think it's a way for the state to get extra money. Also, has anyone seen those "mobile" inspection vans on the highway? They supposedly test you as you enter the freeway. Do you really think that is a accurate test? My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Shog9 0
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        kgaddy wrote:

                        100% of cars produced today (for sale in the US) are within federal limits.

                        I take it you live in a wonderful, magical place with no idiot "Monster Garage"-wannabes? 'Cause around here, it wouldn't matter if 100% of the cars sold were zero-emissions, runs-on-water, whisper-quiet fantasy cars... they'd still be hacked into noisy, polluting, machines-of-death within weeks of being purchased. ----

                        Bots don't know when people die. --Paul Watson, RIP

                        K 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • S Shog9 0

                          kgaddy wrote:

                          100% of cars produced today (for sale in the US) are within federal limits.

                          I take it you live in a wonderful, magical place with no idiot "Monster Garage"-wannabes? 'Cause around here, it wouldn't matter if 100% of the cars sold were zero-emissions, runs-on-water, whisper-quiet fantasy cars... they'd still be hacked into noisy, polluting, machines-of-death within weeks of being purchased. ----

                          Bots don't know when people die. --Paul Watson, RIP

                          K Offline
                          K Offline
                          kgaddy
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Well that may be true. I guess my biggest complaint is how they test. My mom told me once that "while we all don't speak the same language, everyone in the world undestands an asskicking"

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Q QuiJohn

                            I consider myself a staunch environmentalist--it is usually my top concern when it comes to political issues. I believe someone needs to look out for the environment, because people and companies tend not to. I am also a born skeptic, so much of the global warming hoopla drives me absolutely insane. Whether or not humans are contributing to global warming is largely irrelevant--there are enough local repurcussions of pollution that we should have the strictest possible laws about it anyway. Calling it "global warming" lets people believe it's someone else's problem. They think that one little car or one little factory can't make much of a global impact. And they're right! But it can destroy their local waterways and the breathable air in their own town. Have you driven through Gary, Indiana lately? So what does it even matter if global warming is "real" or not? Look at *local* climate change, which is undeniably real and many times scarier.

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            peterchen
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            David Kentley wrote:

                            Whether or not humans are contributing to global warming is largely irrelevant

                            Absolutely. The question is: what needs and can be done about it.


                            Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
                            Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups