Rage wrote: I had the same thought about MSOffice lately. Some things shall not run in a web browser - the name says it all : it is made for browsing. Period. That's one of the most beautiful things I have ever read in my life. You are a light of hope in an otherwise dismally bleak void of infinite darkness. Web pages and web apps belong in browser windows; industry-standard photo editing software belongs on the OS desktop. In no way can a web browser function to accommodate such complex and performance-demanding software. Perhaps one day in the future that may be different, but current web browsers? No. It's absurd. It's been hours, and I still haven't been able to figure out what the benefit of running Photoshop inside a web browser could possibly be. We don't put toaster ovens inside washing machines. It doesn't take a rocket surgeon to figure that one out. :wtf: I'll be back on a bit later. I need to go drive my car into my swimming pool. Then, I need to gather firewood so I can light a fire inside my refrigerator. After I do that I need to swallow a bar of soap. It's going to be a busy day. Oh, no! I forgot to put my chainsaw in my mailbox. How could I forget to do something so important?

megaadam wrote: I was unaware that PS7 is easy to get. Want a copy? :-D I don't know where/how it might be available online these days. I bought my copy in 2003 -- from an online "OEM" seller.

I have to disagree here. In every online page navigation UI I've ever seen, "next" takes you to the "next page", not the "next set of page numbers". And I imagine that going from page 1 to page 2 is far more common than wanting to jump from page 1 directly to page 11. As for the "redundancy": yes, you could find the specific page you're on, find the link to the next page number, and click on that. But that takes more effort than just clicking on the "next" link. :) "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

If we assume that the relative humidity in desert air is 10%, that would mean that 22.4 liters of air at 25 degrees centigrade would contain 2.24 liters of water vapour, or about 0.040 liters of liquid water. We therefore need to process 560 liters of air to get 1 liter of water, or 560 cubic meters of air to get 1,000 liters. The average domestic water usage in Israel (pop. 10,000,000) is about 100 liters a day, so supplying the entire country with water (assuming that the entire country were a desert, which it isn't) would require 560,000,000 cubic meters of air a day, spread out over the entire country. This is a cube 825 meters on a side, daily. Given that the area of Israel is about 25,000 square kilometers, and that a lot of the water will evaporate after use, I'm not worried about any climate effects. Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

:doh: I'd move it ... :-O "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

dandy72 wrote: It would be more useful than some of the messages I've seen. Amen, buddy. :laugh: Jeremy Falcon

I like having "my babies" like my graphics library that even has its own website, and lasts from project to project. I find it satisfying to work on them, so I am glad I have the opportunity to do so. Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

That is the real, hardware, install emulator. :) >64 It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.