I mean, at least they didn't call the db fields f1, f2, etc. See, they tried... :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Jeremy Falcon

Windows key + V is a game changer. Been working for me pretty consistently past few years, knock on wood

Yup. That's pretty much it. Advanced TypeScript Programming Projects

Ah yes, that one's a classic. Thanks for reminding me this exists. :-)

I think it should be itinerant for travelling or itinerants for travellers - just sayin :) In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

Thanks for letting us know Pete In a closed society where everybody's guilty, the only crime is getting caught. In a world of thieves, the only final sin is stupidity. - Hunter S Thompson - RIP

I mean, that's javascript though. I'm more talking about parsing and interpreting CSS properly on embedded systems, no JavaScript. Think a stripped down webkit for small embedded devices. CSS as it stands requires the DOM. There's a reasonable subset of it in terms of selector syntax that wouldn't require a DOM and could be forward only parsed. Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

Ring around, sounds like you are unpunctual, forwarded. (10) So, when I was starting this out, the thought process was: Circled was the ring, and it would go around the rest of the answer. That means that Circled should surround the other part of the answer. However, my mistake was dropping the l and e here. So, with the rest of the answer, Circled would have gone around ulate. That pesky l/e was my blindspot here, if I had left it in, that would be Circlulateed. Advanced TypeScript Programming Projects

I have a friend that can't retire at 70 because she's a 35yr RPG expert. Makes over $300/hr. fixing critical issues and has a backlog of waiting clients.

thanks for a million! this is what I am looking for:) diligent hands rule....

It's now Tuesday morning here, and I'll put one up in a few hours. Software rusts. Simon Stephenson, ca 1994. So does this signature. me, 2012

raddevus wrote: If you don't have the deconstructor in your class and you try the destructuring you will get an error Unless you have a deconstructor extension method, which can be handy for third-party classes that don't provide them: // In your "SimpleShapes.dll" assembly: public class Rectangle(float width, float height) { public readonly float Width = width, Height = height; } // In my application code: public static class Shapes { public static void Deconstruct (this Rectangle rectangle, out float width, out float height) => (width, height) = (rectangle.Width, rectangle.Height); } "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer