Yup. That's pretty much it. Advanced TypeScript Programming Projects

dandy72 wrote: Which doesn't make them valueless. But you said "...books were just taking up place in a number of boxes on the floor of a closet." You wanted the storage. You didn't want to build an addition onto your house to provide that storage. Which is the same problem the library has. Except multiplied by thousands.

The type of site you're looking for is called a [Single Page Application](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-page\_application) (SPA). There are variations of this that do and don't change the address, etc, but the idea is the same for all... they don't reload the entire page when you navigate. Compte Personnel wrote: Does it require advanced programming knowledge? Yes. What's more is that there is one major drawback to SPAs, SEO and indexing by search engines. You can work around this in several ways, but that does add on to the complexity of the page. Compte Personnel wrote: how can I put this on a blog that I develop on Wordpress. Unless you're willing to spend the next couple of years really learning this stuff, your best bet is to just buy a WordPress theme that's an SPA already for like $50-$75. A SPA is not something you want to start with for your first site. Jeremy Falcon

Thanks for the answer. You are right, it is routing problem. My first applicatoin can run with "localhost:8080/index.php/lampiran", and then I built another application from scratch, and it run with "localhost:8080/lampiran".

Unfortunately the corporate IT gestapo gives me a load of crap every time I want to use third-party software. For open source / freeware I just use it and beg forgiveness if I get caught. This is what happened when they discovered I was using Inno Setup. They wanted me to stop using it, but by that time it had been used for all of our products for years. Purchased software is a PITA because they evaluate it, don't like it, and then offer an alternative that doesn't do what I need. For this reason, I usually roll my own for this sort of thing. Software Zen: delete this;

Member 16359559 wrote: displayed correctly under html in Debian 9, but not later. I would start with the assumptions in there. A stored character has a binary representation. There is no way you can see a character until it is 'translated' into a viewer. Doesn't matter what the viewer is it still must do that translation. And sometimes there is more than one translation in the pipeline (for example database to driver, to a 'string', then to 'html', then to a browser.) Member 16359559 wrote: Greek alphabet That also is an assumption. There is a character set, a binary representation, which is used for a 'language'. It will have a specific name. So you really need to determine what that is. Then the steps First extract the binary data from the database. Probably test data. Determine if the form is correct. That is does the binary value (hex or binary) match the character set. Note that if you attempt this by displaying a 'character' then you are not doing it correctly. If the binary value is not correct for the character set then nothing you can do in the code will fix that. Second step determine the pipeline from binary to display. This does include the driver between the whatever application/code that reads the database itself. For each step you must determine whether the binary value retains its original correct value. If you find a step where it is wrong then you have found where the problem is. You should also look for a different way to view the data besides html and a browser. Even just initially that might be the easiest way to determine if those are the problem.

v1 - CodeProject[^] M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

I'm not sure I agree with most of the points made. In my 35 years of writing software, I have _never_ seen code anally refactored to stupid silly functions. Does this really help understanding? Supportability? I'd say meh. private void createPluralDependentMessageParts(int count) { if (count == 0) { thereAreNoLetters(); } else if (count == 1) { thereIsOneLetter(); } else { thereAreManyLetters(count); } } Ten days until my retirement sabbatical, but the opening brace on every function or conditional drives me to drink. And yes, I know that's a religious argument. Sure, you save one line on the page, but it just seems to make the code compressed and hard to scan. Charlie Gilley “They who can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.” BF, 1759 Has never been more appropriate.