Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Another reason I hate Explorer

Another reason I hate Explorer

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
c++csscomsysadminarchitecture
16 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H HalfWayMan

    I think we can all pretty much agree with this. The number of times I have had EXACTLY the same problems still amazes me. Why am I still using Windows?!? One thing that really annoys me is when you attempt to delete a directory and it will delete half the files, then realise it cannot delete one of them and, instead of skipping it, stop altogether. And it will do this with copying and moving too. Of course, there is the TIMEOUT_FOREVERANDADAY to wait for too. Stupid Windows.

    E Offline
    E Offline
    Ed Poore
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    HalfWayMan wrote:

    Stupid Windows

    Two solutions:

    1. **Best:**Switch to *nix
    2. Switch to DOS (or pseudo dos). If using network folders, create a mapped drive so "DOS" can recognise it then use a command-line program with the silent option on, e.g. copy *.* M:\backup /q (BTW, I don't know if that works, long time since I ran Windows ;P)

    Ed

    H V 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • E Ed Poore

      HalfWayMan wrote:

      Stupid Windows

      Two solutions:

      1. **Best:**Switch to *nix
      2. Switch to DOS (or pseudo dos). If using network folders, create a mapped drive so "DOS" can recognise it then use a command-line program with the silent option on, e.g. copy *.* M:\backup /q (BTW, I don't know if that works, long time since I ran Windows ;P)

      Ed

      H Offline
      H Offline
      HalfWayMan
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      Cheers for the advice, but my problem is that I shouldn't [i]have[/i] to do anything. I actually like a lot of Microsoft's software (apart from Office and a couple of others) and I really want to hope that Vistahorn will be a "good" operating system. However, hope being the greatest evil, we will probably be dumped with anouther DOS + GUI remix.

      E 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • H HalfWayMan

        Cheers for the advice, but my problem is that I shouldn't [i]have[/i] to do anything. I actually like a lot of Microsoft's software (apart from Office and a couple of others) and I really want to hope that Vistahorn will be a "good" operating system. However, hope being the greatest evil, we will probably be dumped with anouther DOS + GUI remix.

        E Offline
        E Offline
        Ed Poore
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        I too like some of MS stuff, chiefly VS and also Office which are both ahead of the free alternatives. I can do without Office since I don't use it that much. If only VS2005 ran on *nix. I've actually seen some screenshots of it being installed on Wine, I did try but it bombed out because of no Windows Installer 3 (me thinks) so I might try it again later. And that will be me sorted, the power of *nix and VS combined :cool: Ed

        H 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E Ed Poore

          I too like some of MS stuff, chiefly VS and also Office which are both ahead of the free alternatives. I can do without Office since I don't use it that much. If only VS2005 ran on *nix. I've actually seen some screenshots of it being installed on Wine, I did try but it bombed out because of no Windows Installer 3 (me thinks) so I might try it again later. And that will be me sorted, the power of *nix and VS combined :cool: Ed

          H Offline
          H Offline
          HalfWayMan
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          Ed.Poore wrote:

          ...the power of *nix and VS combined

          Don't say that. It's just too nice a thought.

          E 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • H HalfWayMan

            Ed.Poore wrote:

            ...the power of *nix and VS combined

            Don't say that. It's just too nice a thought.

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Ed Poore
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            HalfWayMan wrote:

            Don't say that. It's just too nice a thought.

            Wish I could remember where the screenshot of VS2005 being installed on Wine was... Ed

            H 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Ed Poore

              HalfWayMan wrote:

              Don't say that. It's just too nice a thought.

              Wish I could remember where the screenshot of VS2005 being installed on Wine was... Ed

              H Offline
              H Offline
              HalfWayMan
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Nice thoughts... Use VS2k5 IDE with GNU C... drool.

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • H HalfWayMan

                Nice thoughts... Use VS2k5 IDE with GNU C... drool.

                E Offline
                E Offline
                Ed Poore
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                Shame this was an April fools. :sigh: Ed

                H 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Ed Poore

                  Shame this was an April fools. :sigh: Ed

                  H Offline
                  H Offline
                  HalfWayMan
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  :((

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • C Chris Maunder

                    No, not IE, but Windows explorer. I have a bunch of network directories in my network neighbourhood, many of which are no longer valid. Two things kill me: 1. Trying to right click on a dead link causes the explorer window to lock up while it times out. It would be so, SO nice if, when right clicking, a generic list of options was presented, and then, as more information came to hand, extra options were added. Or even setting the timeout to something less than TIMEOUT_FOREVERANDADAY would be nice 2. Similar to 1: When dragging files over a list of network shortcuts should you accidentally travel over the airspace of a dud link explorer will lock up while trying to interogate what cursor it should display while you're spending that 10 nanoseconds dragging your file over the link. How about a background thread for this? I feel like I'm walking through a minefield when exploring network folders cheers, Chris Maunder

                    CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                    H Offline
                    H Offline
                    HalfWayMan
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    Because it just crashed on me (again) and now I have no start menu. Ctrl-Shift-Esc.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C Chris Maunder

                      No, not IE, but Windows explorer. I have a bunch of network directories in my network neighbourhood, many of which are no longer valid. Two things kill me: 1. Trying to right click on a dead link causes the explorer window to lock up while it times out. It would be so, SO nice if, when right clicking, a generic list of options was presented, and then, as more information came to hand, extra options were added. Or even setting the timeout to something less than TIMEOUT_FOREVERANDADAY would be nice 2. Similar to 1: When dragging files over a list of network shortcuts should you accidentally travel over the airspace of a dud link explorer will lock up while trying to interogate what cursor it should display while you're spending that 10 nanoseconds dragging your file over the link. How about a background thread for this? I feel like I'm walking through a minefield when exploring network folders cheers, Chris Maunder

                      CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DerMeister
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      I feel your pain Chris. I gave up on explorer long ago and use alternative file managers for browsing my network. I also gave up explorer as a shell long long ago and have never gone back. I think you should first try a different file manager and to rid the pain of lockups and crashes use an alternative shell for better speed and stability. I use bblean shell and servant salamander as my file manager and when I've installed new systems I build I quickly realise the pain explorer can be and how slow the system is before I clean it up and kill explorers existance or lets say use for good.

                      Chris Maunder wrote:

                      I feel like I'm walking through a minefield when exploring network folders

                      :laugh: well put, a perfect example.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C Chris Maunder

                        No, not IE, but Windows explorer. I have a bunch of network directories in my network neighbourhood, many of which are no longer valid. Two things kill me: 1. Trying to right click on a dead link causes the explorer window to lock up while it times out. It would be so, SO nice if, when right clicking, a generic list of options was presented, and then, as more information came to hand, extra options were added. Or even setting the timeout to something less than TIMEOUT_FOREVERANDADAY would be nice 2. Similar to 1: When dragging files over a list of network shortcuts should you accidentally travel over the airspace of a dud link explorer will lock up while trying to interogate what cursor it should display while you're spending that 10 nanoseconds dragging your file over the link. How about a background thread for this? I feel like I'm walking through a minefield when exploring network folders cheers, Chris Maunder

                        CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                        M Offline
                        M Offline
                        Michael Dunn
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Chris Maunder wrote:

                        When dragging files over a list of network shortcuts should you accidentally travel over the airspace of a dud link explorer will lock up

                        That one bites me all the time. :mad: --Mike-- Visual C++ MVP :cool: LINKS~! Ericahist | NEW!! PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • C Chris Maunder

                          No, not IE, but Windows explorer. I have a bunch of network directories in my network neighbourhood, many of which are no longer valid. Two things kill me: 1. Trying to right click on a dead link causes the explorer window to lock up while it times out. It would be so, SO nice if, when right clicking, a generic list of options was presented, and then, as more information came to hand, extra options were added. Or even setting the timeout to something less than TIMEOUT_FOREVERANDADAY would be nice 2. Similar to 1: When dragging files over a list of network shortcuts should you accidentally travel over the airspace of a dud link explorer will lock up while trying to interogate what cursor it should display while you're spending that 10 nanoseconds dragging your file over the link. How about a background thread for this? I feel like I'm walking through a minefield when exploring network folders cheers, Chris Maunder

                          CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Douglas Troy
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          Total Commander[^] - once you start using it ... you'll never, ever, look back.


                          :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                          Bad Astronomy |Development Blogging|Viksoe.dk's Site

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Douglas Troy

                            Total Commander[^] - once you start using it ... you'll never, ever, look back.


                            :..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
                            Bad Astronomy |Development Blogging|Viksoe.dk's Site

                            L Offline
                            L Offline
                            leppie
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            Been using the same system since the Norton and DOS days :) Windows Explorer, isnt that like the desktop? ;P

                            xacc.ide-0.1.3.2

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • E Ed Poore

                              HalfWayMan wrote:

                              Stupid Windows

                              Two solutions:

                              1. **Best:**Switch to *nix
                              2. Switch to DOS (or pseudo dos). If using network folders, create a mapped drive so "DOS" can recognise it then use a command-line program with the silent option on, e.g. copy *.* M:\backup /q (BTW, I don't know if that works, long time since I ran Windows ;P)

                              Ed

                              V Offline
                              V Offline
                              V 0
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              And here I thought windows was more advanced ;P No hurries, no worries.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups