Bush and free-trade
-
Steel companies should go out of business and should not be artificially supported if they cannot compete.
sounds logical. and i don't agree with the tarrif, either. but what if the US suddenly went to war with japan, india and china - where would we get our steel from then? that's right, nowhere. we'd be screwed. see, it's also important to preserve the capacity to make steel, food and oil, even if it means propping up inefficient businesses. it's a much more complex situation than it appears. -c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc. You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
-
sounds logical. and i don't agree with the tarrif, either. but what if the US suddenly went to war with japan, india and china - where would we get our steel from then? that's right, nowhere. we'd be screwed. see, it's also important to preserve the capacity to make steel, food and oil, even if it means propping up inefficient businesses. it's a much more complex situation than it appears. -c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc. You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
Yup. Just take a look at WWII and how much was won and lost because of oil. Tim Smith I know what you're thinking punk, you're thinking did he spell check this document? Well, to tell you the truth I kinda forgot myself in all this excitement. But being this here's CodeProject, the most powerful forums in the world and would blow your head clean off, you've got to ask yourself one question, Do I feel lucky? Well do ya punk?
-
sounds logical. and i don't agree with the tarrif, either. but what if the US suddenly went to war with japan, india and china - where would we get our steel from then? that's right, nowhere. we'd be screwed. see, it's also important to preserve the capacity to make steel, food and oil, even if it means propping up inefficient businesses. it's a much more complex situation than it appears. -c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc. You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
Chris Losinger wrote: but what if the US suddenly went to war with japan, india and china - where would we get our steel from then? that's right, nowhere. we'd be screwed. So are you saying that free trade is ok in some industries but not others ? If that is the case then every country will have the right to decide what industries they apply free trade to ? The result will be chaos. Would you include every industry that was vital to war ? If you say yes , then I will challenge you to name an industry that could not be construed as vital to war. Globalisation means that the whole world is more important than ANY individual country. Regards Andrew Torrance You say the glass is half empty, I say that makes it your round.
-
huh? A few points I would like to respond to there; but most of them have already been discussed in this list recently. But the one that I would like to point out is: At least the US has a foreign policy and doesn't sit back like pacifists Definition of pacifist: opposition to war or violence as a means of settling disputes so is that a bad thing? Have fun, Paul Westcott.
Yes. Pacifism Does Not Work.
-Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] MadHamster Creations "I was born human. But this was an accident of fate - a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change..."
-
Yes. Pacifism Does Not Work.
-Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] MadHamster Creations "I was born human. But this was an accident of fate - a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change..."
Domenic [CPUA 0x1337] wrote: Yes. Pacifism Does Not Work. IMHO neither does Politics, but we still ain't learnt that lesson... ;P Andy Metcalfe - Sonardyne International Ltd
Trouble with resource IDs? Try the Resource ID Organiser Add-In for Visual C++
"I would be careful in separating your wierdness, a good quirky weirdness, from the disturbed wierdness of people who take pleasure from PVC sheep with fruit repositories." - Paul Watson -
Daniel Ferguson wrote: but their foreign policy, to put it mildly, sucks What, we don't give foreign countries enough hand-outs? At least the US has a foreign policy and doesn't sit back like pacifists. If we didn't engage and give out the goodies, you others would be crying even more.
Where did you get this hand-out stuff from? This thread was started about tariffs that the US imposes on other countries trading with them -- who's getting the hand-outs here? :rolleyes: As for, the US going around helping other nations -- we all know that's a load of crap as well. I'm sure the Vietnamese people hold a celebration every year to thank those benevolent Americans who came to help them. And so on, etc.... The current situation in Afganistan has roots in the Americans funding Osama in the Afghani war against Russia. Now look where they are. If the Americans had just kept their hands to themselves they would be better off, but no they can't do that. If that's what you think of as helping other countries -- I'll do without, thanks. X| "I've read the Bible through a couple of times and it is a nice collection of morality stories and adventure fiction. Sort of like Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer except without the laughs." -- Michael P Butler 14 Mar '02
-
Yes. Pacifism Does Not Work.
-Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] MadHamster Creations "I was born human. But this was an accident of fate - a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change..."
Oh come on. Of course pacifism taken to an extreme is not goint to work. But that shouldn't stop people from trying to find a passive solution to problems. Of course there are times that such policies don't work, and force has to be used. But the way the previous message was stated was that that was is the first approach to use. It should not be. Have fun, Paul Westcott.
-
sounds logical. and i don't agree with the tarrif, either. but what if the US suddenly went to war with japan, india and china - where would we get our steel from then? that's right, nowhere. we'd be screwed. see, it's also important to preserve the capacity to make steel, food and oil, even if it means propping up inefficient businesses. it's a much more complex situation than it appears. -c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc. You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
Because India and China are nuclear powers (even H-bombs owner for China), have a good luck if U are involved in a war against them. And good luck for the rest of the Humanity too, it would be helpful to survive a nuclear war. ------------------------------------ Ash to ash, and clay to clay, If the enemy doesn't get you Your own folk may ------------------------------------
-
It only stands to reason that the bigger your economy is the greater will be the probability of forming policy which is contradictory. The U.S. must protect its economy the same way every other country does, but because of the size of our economy the problem of defending it is proportionally more complex. I don't particularly like the polilicies which the Bush administration has enacted lately, but I do appreciate that they are acting in what they consider to be the best interests of the U.S. economy. (However, I do think the steel tariff's were in large part an attempt to throw a bone to the labor unions to get their support in our mid-term elections later this year.) Also, it stands to reason that Americans would be less inclined to be aware of tariffs which obviously don't impact most of us on a daily basis. Again, this is a large country. Most Americans pay attention to local politics but do not concern themselves too much with federal and international issues. The truth is that the U.S. was very poorly designed politically to be a world super-power. The designers of our system gave all their attention to how we were going to work internally and gave little consideration to how we would interact with the world once we had accrued the sort of power we enjoy today. "There's a slew of slip 'twixt cup and lip"
The designers of our system gave all their attention to how we were going to work internally and gave little consideration to how we would interact with the world once we had accrued the sort of power we enjoy today. Blaming the founding fathers for bad policy decissions today? Pleeeeaaase. Have fun, Paul Westcott.
-
Where did you get this hand-out stuff from? This thread was started about tariffs that the US imposes on other countries trading with them -- who's getting the hand-outs here? :rolleyes: As for, the US going around helping other nations -- we all know that's a load of crap as well. I'm sure the Vietnamese people hold a celebration every year to thank those benevolent Americans who came to help them. And so on, etc.... The current situation in Afganistan has roots in the Americans funding Osama in the Afghani war against Russia. Now look where they are. If the Americans had just kept their hands to themselves they would be better off, but no they can't do that. If that's what you think of as helping other countries -- I'll do without, thanks. X| "I've read the Bible through a couple of times and it is a nice collection of morality stories and adventure fiction. Sort of like Huck Finn and Tom Sawyer except without the laughs." -- Michael P Butler 14 Mar '02
Daniel Ferguson wrote: I'm sure the Vietnamese people hold a celebration every year to thank those benevolent Americans who came to help them. And so on, etc.... April 30th is "Liberation Day" (same as July 4th in the US) in Vietnam: it's the official day the tanks stormed through the (South Vietnamese) palace in Saigon (er... Ho Chi Minh City).. So yes, they do have a celebration every year (which i suppose you could say is to all those Americans who came to "help" them and only give them ~15 years of war). Wow.. History class is coming useful! :-D
-
Chris Losinger wrote: but what if the US suddenly went to war with japan, india and china - where would we get our steel from then? that's right, nowhere. we'd be screwed. So are you saying that free trade is ok in some industries but not others ? If that is the case then every country will have the right to decide what industries they apply free trade to ? The result will be chaos. Would you include every industry that was vital to war ? If you say yes , then I will challenge you to name an industry that could not be construed as vital to war. Globalisation means that the whole world is more important than ANY individual country. Regards Andrew Torrance You say the glass is half empty, I say that makes it your round.
Andrew Torrance wrote: Would you include every industry that was vital to war ? If you say yes , then I will challenge you to name an industry that could not be construed as vital to war. the production of stuffed animals would probably not be considered vital to war. Andrew Torrance wrote: So are you saying that free trade is ok in some industries but not others ? i'm not responsible for the US trade policy, so i don't hitnk it matters what i say. -c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc. You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
-
Andrew Torrance wrote: Would you include every industry that was vital to war ? If you say yes , then I will challenge you to name an industry that could not be construed as vital to war. the production of stuffed animals would probably not be considered vital to war. Andrew Torrance wrote: So are you saying that free trade is ok in some industries but not others ? i'm not responsible for the US trade policy, so i don't hitnk it matters what i say. -c
Smaller Animals Software, Inc. You're the icing - on the cake - on the table - at my wake. Modest Mouse
Well thats it then , we should strive for a free and fair stuffed animal industry . The future of the free world depends on those cute little creatures . OR:- What about the fact that stuffed animals comfort bereaved children , thus improving the moral of the country ?