Another Silly puzzle

Phil J Pearson

Chris Losinger wrote:

(partial) vacuum

My Physics teacher would have ranted at you! "Vacuum is a total absence of air. How can you have a partial total absence? You mean 'a pocket of lower air pressure'" Phil

Maxwell Chen

http://www.math.com/tables/expansion/power2.htm[^]

Maxwell Chen

Maxwell Chen

Summation applet[^]. 1) Click the [Applet] button, a popup window is seen. 2) Input 1/(n+1), 3) Click [Auto] button. :-D [Edit] Ouch! Overflow ... ;P [/Edit]

Maxwell Chen

Chris Losinger

Phil J Pearson wrote:

My Physics teacher would have ranted at you!

i would've ranted back. ;) Cleek | Image Toolkits | Thumbnail maker

Bob Flynn

That's not the answer to the question.

Maxwell Chen

Bob Flynn wrote:

That's not the answer to the question.

It is! See the 1st raw in the table.

Maxwell Chen

Bob Flynn

Yes, I saw it. It said that the sum goes to infinity as n goes to infinity. But the question was when does the sum reach 100? If ever. You definitely got the "if ever part", but that left the much more difficult problem of what is the value of n when the sum equals 100.

Dan Neely

I order of magnituded the eta for 100 here. Unless there's an analytical method getting a precise value is impossible since bruteforce isn't an option. http://www.codeproject.com/script/comments/forums.asp?msg=1480757&forumid=1159#xx1480757xx

Bob X

Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

We blow the air away creating a small vacuum pocket and a fire cannot burn in a vacuum. That's my guess anyway

Sorry. You cannot blow into an area and create a vacumm caused by no matter in an area. This is physically impossible through the laws of physics. Carbon Dioxide doesn't put out the flame either because your breath contains a large amount of oxygen in it. If I remember correctly, the flame goes out due to over supplying oxygen to the flame. Similar to why an airplane engine will stall if you make the fuel too rich.

Raj Lal

The real solution is here [^] --- My Unedited article^