Web 2.0 TM!
-
So? I'm sure that they didn't trademarked version Web 2.0.1 !!! :laugh::laugh: Let's hurry, let's hurry!
In the meantime, we are proud to release Web 2.0.117.425369845230RC4-hotfix
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighist -
In the meantime, we are proud to release Web 2.0.117.425369845230RC4-hotfix
Some of us walk the memory lane, others plummet into a rabbit hole
Tree in C# || Fold With Us! || sighistHeck. Let's use a GUID. regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
-
Yes indeedy - O'Reilly has trademarked "Web 2.0"[^] :wtf: '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd
It is daft and irritating and I'll bet a pint that Tim had nothing to do with it. I made some t-shirts[^] to commemorate the moment (I am going to the conference that is being targeted by the letter. It is just down the road and I've met the IT@Cork lads before.) regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
-- modified at 10:39 Friday 26th May, 2006
-
Yes indeedy - O'Reilly has trademarked "Web 2.0"[^] :wtf: '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd
Ah, well. Guess we'll just have to call it Web++ from now on, or maybe Web#. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
Yes indeedy - O'Reilly has trademarked "Web 2.0"[^] :wtf: '--8<------------------------ Ex Datis: Duncan Jones Merrion Computing Ltd
Good. So can we all stop calling it Web 2.0 now? cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
-
Heck. Let's use a GUID. regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
Oh, I'm affraid that we'll find that somebody already patented ALL possibe GUIDs ... :laugh::laugh:
-
Good. So can we all stop calling it Web 2.0 now? cheers, Chris Maunder
CodeProject.com : C++ MVP
OK, OK. Ajax it is then... :P regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
-
Ah, well. Guess we'll just have to call it Web++ from now on, or maybe Web#. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
Michael P Butler wrote:
Ah, well. Guess we'll just have to call it Web++ from now on, or maybe Web#.
Web Live.
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. -
OK, OK. Ajax it is then... :P regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
Paul Watson wrote:
OK, OK. Ajax it is then...
Soon, people would say Atlas when they mean Ajax.
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. -
Oh, I'm affraid that we'll find that somebody already patented ALL possibe GUIDs ... :laugh::laugh:
Yeah. Microsoft. They're even using them for pixel formats now :~
Ryan
"Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
-
Paul Watson wrote:
OK, OK. Ajax it is then...
Soon, people would say Atlas when they mean Ajax.
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications.hehe, good joke Nish :) regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
-
hehe, good joke Nish :) regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
Paul Watson wrote:
hehe, good joke Nish :)
Does that mean you don't think Atlas would succeed?
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. -
Paul Watson wrote:
hehe, good joke Nish :)
Does that mean you don't think Atlas would succeed?
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications.Oh it is OK for those doing ASP.NET websites as the client-server integration and controls are nifty but it is too heavy and overengineered for other backends. Dojo or Prototype are a lot better for that. Atlas also needs to get away from the whole "look how easy it is, drag and drop" tutorials. No web-dev with an ounce of professionalism uses drag-and-drop to code their sites. Just like you don't use D&D for your C++ apps. regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
-
OK, OK. Ajax it is then... :P regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
Sorry Paul, that's also already taken see here[^] :rolleyes:
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |Development Blogging|Viksoe.dk's Site -
Sorry Paul, that's also already taken see here[^] :rolleyes:
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |Development Blogging|Viksoe.dk's SiteAnd the football team and the town in the States :-D regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
-
Oh it is OK for those doing ASP.NET websites as the client-server integration and controls are nifty but it is too heavy and overengineered for other backends. Dojo or Prototype are a lot better for that. Atlas also needs to get away from the whole "look how easy it is, drag and drop" tutorials. No web-dev with an ounce of professionalism uses drag-and-drop to code their sites. Just like you don't use D&D for your C++ apps. regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
Thanks. I don't really know much about Atlas or Ajax - that's why I asked. I didn't realize Atlas was a heavy framework. Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. -
Oh it is OK for those doing ASP.NET websites as the client-server integration and controls are nifty but it is too heavy and overengineered for other backends. Dojo or Prototype are a lot better for that. Atlas also needs to get away from the whole "look how easy it is, drag and drop" tutorials. No web-dev with an ounce of professionalism uses drag-and-drop to code their sites. Just like you don't use D&D for your C++ apps. regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
Paul Watson wrote:
Just like you don't use D&D for your C++ apps.
I sooooo misread D&D then... Where's my d8 when I need it! Iain.
-
And the football team and the town in the States :-D regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
Paul Watson wrote:
And the football team
How well did the Barcelona line in your power-point go down? I thought the Irish were big Arsenal fans. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
-
Paul Watson wrote:
Just like you don't use D&D for your C++ apps.
I sooooo misread D&D then... Where's my d8 when I need it! Iain.
Iain Clarke wrote:
I sooooo misread D&D then... Where's my d8 when I need it!
I didn't get that :( Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
Currently working on C++/CLI in Action for Manning Publications. -
Paul Watson wrote:
And the football team
How well did the Barcelona line in your power-point go down? I thought the Irish were big Arsenal fans. Michael CP Blog [^] Development Blog [^]
hehe not too well :-D Couple of boos and some stony silence. Thankfully my girlfriend is a Barcelona fan so she didn't kill me. regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.