Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. General Programming
  3. C#
  4. Build Comment Web Page in VS 2005

Build Comment Web Page in VS 2005

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved C#
visual-studiocsharpxmltutorialquestion
4 Posts 3 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • A Offline
    A Offline
    Alper Camel
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi all, in Visual Studio 2003, we get used to use the "Build comment Web Page" feature to create web page of the classes with descriptions by xml info. Do you know how to do that in Visual Studio 2005 ? :confused: Thank you so much... :rose: Have a good day. 'Alper

    S S 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • A Alper Camel

      Hi all, in Visual Studio 2003, we get used to use the "Build comment Web Page" feature to create web page of the classes with descriptions by xml info. Do you know how to do that in Visual Studio 2005 ? :confused: Thank you so much... :rose: Have a good day. 'Alper

      S Offline
      S Offline
      scott_hackett
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      That was actually removed from the product and doesn't exist in 2005. It's amazing to me really, I'd think that Microsoft would be all over competing with javadoc. You can still create the XML file by checking an option to do so in the build configuration, but there's no way to generate the HTML. There are a few options, though. I work for SlickEdit and one of the features we offer does just what you're looking for, check out the product showcase link for more info. There's also NDoc which is open source and very popular. There's another product, too, called VS Docman. Each one does things a little differently, so I suggest looking at each one to see what suits you best. I don't know if you had seen what VS 2003 spit out when you actually created the web pages, but it was pretty ugly. That's probably the main reason they dropped it.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A Alper Camel

        Hi all, in Visual Studio 2003, we get used to use the "Build comment Web Page" feature to create web page of the classes with descriptions by xml info. Do you know how to do that in Visual Studio 2005 ? :confused: Thank you so much... :rose: Have a good day. 'Alper

        S Offline
        S Offline
        Stefan Troschuetz
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        This CP article[^] may help you.


        "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Rick Cook

        www.troschuetz.de

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • S scott_hackett

          That was actually removed from the product and doesn't exist in 2005. It's amazing to me really, I'd think that Microsoft would be all over competing with javadoc. You can still create the XML file by checking an option to do so in the build configuration, but there's no way to generate the HTML. There are a few options, though. I work for SlickEdit and one of the features we offer does just what you're looking for, check out the product showcase link for more info. There's also NDoc which is open source and very popular. There's another product, too, called VS Docman. Each one does things a little differently, so I suggest looking at each one to see what suits you best. I don't know if you had seen what VS 2003 spit out when you actually created the web pages, but it was pretty ugly. That's probably the main reason they dropped it.

          A Offline
          A Offline
          Alper Camel
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Thank you :) Too bad to learn that... :(

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          Reply
          • Reply as topic
          Log in to reply
          • Oldest to Newest
          • Newest to Oldest
          • Most Votes


          • Login

          • Don't have an account? Register

          • Login or register to search.
          • First post
            Last post
          0
          • Categories
          • Recent
          • Tags
          • Popular
          • World
          • Users
          • Groups