Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Interview questions gone wrong...

Interview questions gone wrong...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questioncareercom
39 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • F Fuzzychaos

    Had an interview over the phone today. Totally bunged the question. They asked for a test to check if a number is a power of 2 and I answered it as a test to see if it was divisible by 2! Should have been (x && !(x & (x - 1))). What a dolt I be! I was so nervous I messed up other simple ones too. Needless to say I didn't get the job failing the technical questions. Anyone have other mixed up interview questions?

    Jeremy Pemberton-Pigott
    A programmer with a dream can accomplish anything. So, start by implementing your castle in the clouds and then working on its interface to a foundation :-D Quote by: Jeremy Pemberton-Pigott
    New Dawn Engineering

    B Offline
    B Offline
    BoneSoft
    wrote on last edited by
    #29

    Had a phone interview once where on question 3 they said, "Can you tell me in code how to determine if any given number is a prime number in the most optimized algorythm? Go ahead, we'll wait..." Phukers! My reply started with something like "Um uhhh durhh..." Didn't get that job, perhaps a blessing. Then recently, had a phone interview where they gave me several language questions, then asked "If you needed a windows app to listen on another thread for a web service response, how would you implement that design-wise?" My response started off just about the same. I drew blank. My brain was screaming "NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION!" After the call, I thought of a couple good answers, but it sucks when that happens in an interview because then you're thinking about solutions for that stupid scenario for DAYS. Jury's still out on that position...


    Try code model generation tools at BoneSoft.com.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • A AmitDey

      The interviewer meant POWER of 2 ie..1,2,4,8,16,32 and i believe, (((x&(x-1))+1)==2*x) is the right answer.... coz any power of 2 will be of the form 00001000.... and x-1 will of form 00000111.... Now when we do x&(x-1)...ie. bitwise and we get 00001000... 00000111... ------------ 00001111... whichh is 1 less than 0001000 ...(x*2)

      I Offline
      I Offline
      Ivan Milanov
      wrote on last edited by
      #30

      AmitDey wrote:

      Now when we do x&(x-1)...ie. bitwise and we get 00001000... 00000111... ------------ 00001111...

      :confused: This "&" is the bitwise operator for the logical function AND, so, with it you would get 00001000... 00000111... ----------- with operator & 00000000... What you need is the bitwise operator for the logical function OR. The operator is "|" so this operator would be the correct one, hence the expression is "x|(x-1)" 00001000... 00000111... ----------- with operator | 00001111...

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • A AmitDey

        The interviewer meant POWER of 2 ie..1,2,4,8,16,32 and i believe, (((x&(x-1))+1)==2*x) is the right answer.... coz any power of 2 will be of the form 00001000.... and x-1 will of form 00000111.... Now when we do x&(x-1)...ie. bitwise and we get 00001000... 00000111... ------------ 00001111... whichh is 1 less than 0001000 ...(x*2)

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Mikon Dosogne
        wrote on last edited by
        #31

        I think you meant x|(x-1)... But there is another way: x&(~(x-1))==x 00001000... = x 00000111... = x-1 11111000... = ~(x-1) 00001000... = x&(~(x-1)) This should work even if x = 2 (...0000001) or x = (1000000...) Mikon Dosogne

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mikon Dosogne

          I think you meant x|(x-1)... But there is another way: x&(~(x-1))==x 00001000... = x 00000111... = x-1 11111000... = ~(x-1) 00001000... = x&(~(x-1)) This should work even if x = 2 (...0000001) or x = (1000000...) Mikon Dosogne

          B Offline
          B Offline
          bezorn
          wrote on last edited by
          #32

          How about this: x&(x-1)==0

          M 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B bezorn

            How about this: x&(x-1)==0

            M Offline
            M Offline
            Mikon Dosogne
            wrote on last edited by
            #33

            Even better! But did you google the answer? ;)

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I Intellisense

              I agree that those types of questions are probably more about the interviewer's ego than finding the skill level of the applicant. But, that question made me think, a little.:doh: Consider this. All powers of 2, in binary are in the following form: 01, 10, 100, 1000, 10000 etc... which of course is 1, 2, 4, 8, 16, etc... So the easy way to tell is just any number that in binary is a single 1 followed by all zeros.

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Amar Chaudhary
              wrote on last edited by
              #34

              sum all binary and result should be 1 eg : 8= 1000 (bin) 1+0+0+0 =1 // convert binary to string replace '0' with '' check if string length is 1 // ;) and you can explain them this is the most optimesed way it can be cause all the interviwer are not techies they are mostly from hr dept with some questoins (limited) and even if they belong programming they dont prove you wrong so you are right ;) -- modified at 13:24 Tuesday 19th September, 2006

              P 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Mikon Dosogne

                Even better! But did you google the answer? ;)

                B Offline
                B Offline
                bezorn
                wrote on last edited by
                #35

                Mikon Dosogne wrote:

                But did you google the answer?

                Nah, I stumbled on it while working out some math examples using your solution! :) Couldn't of done it without you! :-D:P

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • F Fuzzychaos

                  Had an interview over the phone today. Totally bunged the question. They asked for a test to check if a number is a power of 2 and I answered it as a test to see if it was divisible by 2! Should have been (x && !(x & (x - 1))). What a dolt I be! I was so nervous I messed up other simple ones too. Needless to say I didn't get the job failing the technical questions. Anyone have other mixed up interview questions?

                  Jeremy Pemberton-Pigott
                  A programmer with a dream can accomplish anything. So, start by implementing your castle in the clouds and then working on its interface to a foundation :-D Quote by: Jeremy Pemberton-Pigott
                  New Dawn Engineering

                  N Offline
                  N Offline
                  Neutromancer
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #36

                  I was asked in an interview to write the algorithm to find n numbers in the Fibonacci series, or whatever. I misunderstood them so I accidentally wrote a program that printed on the screen a large phallic figure, and to decode the words corresponding to the acronym "YUCK FOU", and quickly left.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P Polymorpher

                    Right bracket, x, logical and, not, right bracket, x, binary and, right bracet, x - 1, left bracket, left bracket, left bracket ;)

                    Pablo Sometimes I think there's no reason to get out of bed . . . then I feel wet, and I realize there is.

                    N Offline
                    N Offline
                    NormDroid
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #37

                    Polymorpher wrote:

                    Pablo Sometimes I think there's no reason to get out of bed . . . then I feel wet, and I realize there is.

                    :laugh::omg::wtf:

                    We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • N NormDroid

                      Polymorpher wrote:

                      Pablo Sometimes I think there's no reason to get out of bed . . . then I feel wet, and I realize there is.

                      :laugh::omg::wtf:

                      We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

                      P Offline
                      P Offline
                      Polymorpher
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #38

                      LOL, I found that on a homer simpson sight.;P

                      Pablo Sometimes I think there's no reason to get out of bed . . . then I feel wet, and I realize there is.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • A Amar Chaudhary

                        sum all binary and result should be 1 eg : 8= 1000 (bin) 1+0+0+0 =1 // convert binary to string replace '0' with '' check if string length is 1 // ;) and you can explain them this is the most optimesed way it can be cause all the interviwer are not techies they are mostly from hr dept with some questoins (limited) and even if they belong programming they dont prove you wrong so you are right ;) -- modified at 13:24 Tuesday 19th September, 2006

                        P Offline
                        P Offline
                        Polymorpher
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #39

                        Dim Number As Integer = ??? Dim Temp As Integer = 1 Do Until Temp > Number Temp <<= 1 Loop While Temp > 0 If Number < Temp Then Return False Else Number -= Temp End If Temp >>= 1 End While Return True ...Unless there is a simpler way to convert an integer to binary I think the original way was faster

                        Pablo Sometimes I think there's no reason to get out of bed . . . then I feel wet, and I realize there is.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups