Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Database & SysAdmin
  3. System Admin
  4. Partition question...

Partition question...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved System Admin
questionsysadmin
8 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • K Offline
    K Offline
    KORCARI
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Hi.I need any advice.We have a server with 2 hard disks each by 250 Gb.Which is the most efficent partition I have to use?I mean from your experience how many parts is better to create? Best Regards

    D 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • K KORCARI

      Hi.I need any advice.We have a server with 2 hard disks each by 250 Gb.Which is the most efficent partition I have to use?I mean from your experience how many parts is better to create? Best Regards

      D Offline
      D Offline
      Dave Kreskowiak
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Efficiency depends on the application. What I've done in the past is a smaller hard drive that holds only the boot and system, mirrored with an identical drive, and the remaining, larger capacity drives, reserved for applications and user data, usually RAID 5. I don't partition the drives at all in the method you're thinking of. I consider it a waste because if the drive goes down, partitioning won't make any difference what-so-ever. In the above solution, if a drive goes down, I'll lose either the system, which is backed by a mirror drive, or the RAID 5 array keeps running without the bad drive, until it's replaced.

      Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Dave Kreskowiak

        Efficiency depends on the application. What I've done in the past is a smaller hard drive that holds only the boot and system, mirrored with an identical drive, and the remaining, larger capacity drives, reserved for applications and user data, usually RAID 5. I don't partition the drives at all in the method you're thinking of. I consider it a waste because if the drive goes down, partitioning won't make any difference what-so-ever. In the above solution, if a drive goes down, I'll lose either the system, which is backed by a mirror drive, or the RAID 5 array keeps running without the bad drive, until it's replaced.

        Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

        I consider it a waste because if the drive goes down, partitioning won't make any difference what-so-ever.

        True, but only if the *drive* fails. File systems can also become corrupt do to software failures. Each partition contains a seperate file system.

        static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Dave Kreskowiak wrote:

          I consider it a waste because if the drive goes down, partitioning won't make any difference what-so-ever.

          True, but only if the *drive* fails. File systems can also become corrupt do to software failures. Each partition contains a seperate file system.

          static int Sqrt(int x) { if (x<0) throw new ArgumentOutOfRangeException(); int temp, y=0, b=0x8000, bshft=15, v=x; do { if (v>=(temp=(y<<1)+b<>=1)>0); return y; :omg:

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Dave Kreskowiak
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          I've had drives fail FAR more than I've had a file system get corrupted unrecoverably.

          Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

          E 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dave Kreskowiak

            I've had drives fail FAR more than I've had a file system get corrupted unrecoverably.

            Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Ed Poore
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            :wtf: Do you beat them with a sledge hammer or something? Touch wood I've never had a hard-drive fail on me in 7 years, only one to "fail" resulted in me pulling the power connector too hard when it got jammed in, but then just whipped out the soldering iron and put it back on. I've had corrupted file systems more than hard-drive failures, but even then not than many, maybe once or twice.


            Just Google it. Failing that try phoning :bob:

            D 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Ed Poore

              :wtf: Do you beat them with a sledge hammer or something? Touch wood I've never had a hard-drive fail on me in 7 years, only one to "fail" resulted in me pulling the power connector too hard when it got jammed in, but then just whipped out the soldering iron and put it back on. I've had corrupted file systems more than hard-drive failures, but even then not than many, maybe once or twice.


              Just Google it. Failing that try phoning :bob:

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Dave Kreskowiak
              wrote on last edited by
              #6

              Man, I've had 3 fail in one week! Western Digitals and a Maxtor. No, I didn't touch them. When I was at [major automotive manufacturer], we had 8 drives fail (all Seagates), out of some 1,200+, in 4 years in the manufacturing plants.

              Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

              E 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • D Dave Kreskowiak

                Man, I've had 3 fail in one week! Western Digitals and a Maxtor. No, I didn't touch them. When I was at [major automotive manufacturer], we had 8 drives fail (all Seagates), out of some 1,200+, in 4 years in the manufacturing plants.

                Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

                E Offline
                E Offline
                Ed Poore
                wrote on last edited by
                #7

                :omg: Ouch, any idea what caused them to fail?


                Google it. If that fails then start a :badger::badger::badger: dance.

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • E Ed Poore

                  :omg: Ouch, any idea what caused them to fail?


                  Google it. If that fails then start a :badger::badger::badger: dance.

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dave Kreskowiak
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #8

                  Nope. No time to really get into it - replace 'em and move on. Compaq ships everything Next Day Air, so we really didn't care, so long as we didn't run into a large string of 'em.

                  Dave Kreskowiak Microsoft MVP - Visual Basic

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  Reply
                  • Reply as topic
                  Log in to reply
                  • Oldest to Newest
                  • Newest to Oldest
                  • Most Votes


                  • Login

                  • Don't have an account? Register

                  • Login or register to search.
                  • First post
                    Last post
                  0
                  • Categories
                  • Recent
                  • Tags
                  • Popular
                  • World
                  • Users
                  • Groups