Wow! I thought my 10MP was cool
-
Not that megapixels is everything but this camera definitely takes the prize. Pretty well priced at $36,000 ;P http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06093007seitzd3.asp[^]
My pointless rants meragussa.blogspot.com[^]
-
Not that megapixels is everything but this camera definitely takes the prize. Pretty well priced at $36,000 ;P http://www.dpreview.com/news/0609/06093007seitzd3.asp[^]
My pointless rants meragussa.blogspot.com[^]
Looks like it's practical only for still shots. Very still shots. Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
Looks like it's practical only for still shots. Very still shots. Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
depends if the 1sec time is for the CCD to actually make the image, or to read the image from the chip into memory.
I think for the CCD to take the image. Else they would not be talking so much about the 1 second issue. That would then just be a slow FPS for the camera.
My pointless rants meragussa.blogspot.com[^]
-
Looks like it's practical only for still shots. Very still shots. Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh SmithYep, but they say its for panaromic landscapes so should not be a problem.
My pointless rants meragussa.blogspot.com[^]
-
I think for the CCD to take the image. Else they would not be talking so much about the 1 second issue. That would then just be a slow FPS for the camera.
My pointless rants meragussa.blogspot.com[^]
yikes. Did they get that resolution by using insanely small pixels instead of an insanely larger chip? The tiny pixels don't really fit with the 48bit image depth though since the number of electrons that can be stored in a tiny pixel before saturation is so low.
-
yikes. Did they get that resolution by using insanely small pixels instead of an insanely larger chip? The tiny pixels don't really fit with the 48bit image depth though since the number of electrons that can be stored in a tiny pixel before saturation is so low.