Why Vista?
-
Christopher Duncan wrote:
what will I actually be able to do with Vista that I can't already do with XP?
Boot slower, not change startup sound, oh wait... wrong sales pitch. :-D Um... you'll not be able to use VS2K3... oops did it again. Let's see... how about you can have bigger icons now on the desktop? There ya go, that's a winner.
Jeremy Falcon A multithreaded, OpenGL-enabled application.[^]
To be fair you cannot turn off the OS X boot sound without resorting to 3rd party apps or writing your own bash login scripts. Rather annoying.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
-
I've posted on this at least twice before in the lounge. Unfortunately the search isn't digging it up. Here are some reason I'm planning on moving to Vista: Security: users run as non-admin by default, which is difficult to do in XP (something I've been doing for over 2 years, and it is a major pain) An improved shell: check out the breadcrumb bars, the save file dialogs -- things have really simplified, and simple is better. Search: search actually works and it's fast (and hey, there's no little doggy :)). And with Search folders, you can basically have dynamic folders that update themselves automatically. For instance, you could have a search folder that contains all image files containing the word family. The folder automatically updates as you save new family photos to your computer. Parental controls: see what games your child has been playing, and for how long. Set time limits on games, rating limits, and at what times they can be played. Haven't looked at internet parental control yet. Start menu that makes sense: every machine I go to, you click the Start->Programs and *booom!* the whole screen fills with program entries. Vista's new Start Menu solves this problem by making the menu a limited size with scrolling. That itself isn't great, but you can type in a search box embedded right in the start menu to find any program. In practice, this if far faster than visually finding some program group floating among a hundred others. DirectX 10: Vista only! If you're a gamer (my wife and I both are) then Vista is a must for this reason alone. Better UI: sure, the eye candy, visuals, and animations makes XP look like Win 3.1, but they've actually improved on UI design. Have a look at this blog post[^] for a quick skim of some changes in Vista's UI design. Those are just some off the top of my head. I suspect Vista will easily supplant XP as the dominant OS in the coming years. *edit* oooh, almost forgot. A new network stack built from the ground up with IPv6 support. In addition to security and performance improvements, it lets you do cool things like Windows Internet Computer Name[^], no Dynamic DNS required. :cool:
Judah Himango wrote:
Start menu that makes sense: every machine I go to, you click the Start->rograms and *booom!* the whole screen fills with program entries. Vista's new Start Menu solves this problem by making the menu a limited size with scrolling.
The option to choose between a multicolumn or a scrolling startmenu if you have alot of icons exists in XP. I don't recall where, but do remember having to switch from scrolling to multicolumn before. Other features that I've cooled over the descriptions of are per app volume control at the OS level. Mute the browser so embedded audio anoyances aren't heard. Double or tripple the volume on my DVD player so I don't blow my ear drums in switchig back to winamp after watching a movie. Delete in explorer reports undeletable files, but doesn't halt on the first error reported. Sound (and some other??) drivers moved out of the kernal so they won't bluescreen you when they crash. I'm not sure which version I'll get, but my fall07/spring08 PC will probably be running some version of it.
-- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.
-
Christopher Duncan wrote:
what will I actually be able to do with Vista that I can't already do with XP?
Set volume for each program separately (something i wanted for the past 5 years) :cool:
"..Commit yourself to quality from day one..it's better to do nothing at all than to do something badly.." -- Mark McCormick
|| Fold With Us! || Pensieve || VG.Net ||
I take it you can still mute across all apps with one simple mouse-click or keystroke, right? (And to be honest I have never wanted to set different volumes for different apps.)
regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
-
Christopher Duncan wrote:
what will I actually be able to do with Vista that I can't already do with XP?
Bah, its obvious dude...you wont have to change settings to have a red BSOD together with a blue one.
:badger:
:cool: :) :)
--------------------------------------------------------- Complete freedom is a state without context ---------------------------------------------------------
-
Dario Solera wrote:
I really don't understand why you have been voted down.
A few luddites and anti-Microsoft, high-horse techno zealots, I suspect. :)
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: God-as-Judge, God-as-Forgiver The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
are these the same people who are voting down everyone who's unimpressed with Vista ?
-
I've posted on this at least twice before in the lounge. Unfortunately the search isn't digging it up. Here are some reason I'm planning on moving to Vista: Security: users run as non-admin by default, which is difficult to do in XP (something I've been doing for over 2 years, and it is a major pain) An improved shell: check out the breadcrumb bars, the save file dialogs -- things have really simplified, and simple is better. Search: search actually works and it's fast (and hey, there's no little doggy :)). And with Search folders, you can basically have dynamic folders that update themselves automatically. For instance, you could have a search folder that contains all image files containing the word family. The folder automatically updates as you save new family photos to your computer. Parental controls: see what games your child has been playing, and for how long. Set time limits on games, rating limits, and at what times they can be played. Haven't looked at internet parental control yet. Start menu that makes sense: every machine I go to, you click the Start->Programs and *booom!* the whole screen fills with program entries. Vista's new Start Menu solves this problem by making the menu a limited size with scrolling. That itself isn't great, but you can type in a search box embedded right in the start menu to find any program. In practice, this if far faster than visually finding some program group floating among a hundred others. DirectX 10: Vista only! If you're a gamer (my wife and I both are) then Vista is a must for this reason alone. Better UI: sure, the eye candy, visuals, and animations makes XP look like Win 3.1, but they've actually improved on UI design. Have a look at this blog post[^] for a quick skim of some changes in Vista's UI design. Those are just some off the top of my head. I suspect Vista will easily supplant XP as the dominant OS in the coming years. *edit* oooh, almost forgot. A new network stack built from the ground up with IPv6 support. In addition to security and performance improvements, it lets you do cool things like Windows Internet Computer Name[^], no Dynamic DNS required. :cool:
-
Christopher Duncan wrote:
Neat & Groovy set of eye candy. Again, sexy for geeks, but no real tangible benefit.
I'm a nerd rather than a geek, and I don't like eye candy in my OS. Such things are not for nerds (and I doubt geeks want them either), they are for everyday users who don't know any better -- i.e. most of Microsoft's market share. I like icons and toolbars that are small, non-distracting, and customizable. I'm now running IE7 which I hear is a precursor to Vista, but I hate hate hate the oversized buttons and crap, I want a "classic" mode. I probably won't go to Vista. I did install the Beta 1 on a system which is now collecting dust in a closet. I hope Vista goes the way of ME, I'll wait for the next one.
Eye candy is cool...as long as it's on my terms, every time I installed XP I would reset it to the default classic scheme. Then I saw a site where people had customized their schemes, freaking awesome...so I did it myself, made my own icons and start menu button, etc.
if (!interested){return false;} amclint
-
I know that a certain amount of you will want anything new just because it's the latest & greatest toy to play with. So, we'll scratch that reason up front as I'm talking about tangible benefits. Vista will also sport a new Neat & Groovy set of eye candy. Again, sexy for geeks, but no real tangible benefit. Having arbitrarily eliminated those two reasons, what are the functional benefits of upgrading to Vista? In other words, besides having a ton of new security / permissions hassles to deal with (not to mention compatibility problems that seem to dwarf all predecessors), what will I actually be able to do with Vista that I can't already do with XP?
Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes www.PracticalStrategyConsulting.com
Well, according to Balmer, you'll have an advertising experience better than TV. Now isn't that worth it? Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith -
I know that a certain amount of you will want anything new just because it's the latest & greatest toy to play with. So, we'll scratch that reason up front as I'm talking about tangible benefits. Vista will also sport a new Neat & Groovy set of eye candy. Again, sexy for geeks, but no real tangible benefit. Having arbitrarily eliminated those two reasons, what are the functional benefits of upgrading to Vista? In other words, besides having a ton of new security / permissions hassles to deal with (not to mention compatibility problems that seem to dwarf all predecessors), what will I actually be able to do with Vista that I can't already do with XP?
Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes www.PracticalStrategyConsulting.com
No reason at all. It'll come on my next computer in a year or so's time but nothing in it that would make me want to upgrade my current system.
pseudonym67 My Articles[^] Beginning KDevelop Programming[^]
-
Kent Sharkey wrote:
6-15 months [...] XP SP5
Three more service packs in 15 month? For a "legacy" operation system? From Microsoft? Nah, I don't think so. ;-) Cheers Martin
"When your own heart asks - how will you respond?" Gosen waka shū "Situation normal - all fu***d up" Illuminatus! My photos on flickr
True that -- I was confusing the dead 2000 SP. I actually meant XP SP3.
-------------- TTFN - Kent
-
I know that a certain amount of you will want anything new just because it's the latest & greatest toy to play with. So, we'll scratch that reason up front as I'm talking about tangible benefits. Vista will also sport a new Neat & Groovy set of eye candy. Again, sexy for geeks, but no real tangible benefit. Having arbitrarily eliminated those two reasons, what are the functional benefits of upgrading to Vista? In other words, besides having a ton of new security / permissions hassles to deal with (not to mention compatibility problems that seem to dwarf all predecessors), what will I actually be able to do with Vista that I can't already do with XP?
Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes www.PracticalStrategyConsulting.com
Not sure, but I've been reading that a lot of corporate customers are taking a second look at Linux because they perceive Vista as being such a major upgrade and so short on new features and value that it's time to see what else is out there. Apparently the perception is that Linux is a viable alternative now to windows for corporate settings. I'm definitely looking into the state of .net on linux when I get some free time. I'd love to port our main business app to Linux as an excercise in learning and if it's doable and not too time consuming release it and see what the percentage of sales there are for it.
-
To be fair you cannot turn off the OS X boot sound without resorting to 3rd party apps or writing your own bash login scripts. Rather annoying.
regards, Paul Watson Ireland FeedHenry needs you
eh, stop bugging me about it, give it a couple of days, see what happens.
Paul Watson wrote:
Rather annoying.
Yeah, but I always liked that feature about Windows. Oh well, I'm sure it's a matter of time before someone has a patch for download.
Jeremy Falcon A multithreaded, OpenGL-enabled application.[^]
-
Jeremy Falcon wrote:
Um... you'll not be able to use VS2K3... oops did it again.
What!? Wasn't it VC6?
-- For proper viewing, take red pill now
Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:
What!? Wasn't it VC6?
I heard also 2K2 and 2K3. I think it's stupid, but then again I'm not MS so my vote doesn't count.
Jeremy Falcon A multithreaded, OpenGL-enabled application.[^]
-
I know that a certain amount of you will want anything new just because it's the latest & greatest toy to play with. So, we'll scratch that reason up front as I'm talking about tangible benefits. Vista will also sport a new Neat & Groovy set of eye candy. Again, sexy for geeks, but no real tangible benefit. Having arbitrarily eliminated those two reasons, what are the functional benefits of upgrading to Vista? In other words, besides having a ton of new security / permissions hassles to deal with (not to mention compatibility problems that seem to dwarf all predecessors), what will I actually be able to do with Vista that I can't already do with XP?
Author of The Career Programmer and Unite the Tribes www.PracticalStrategyConsulting.com
I don't think it offers developers anything particularly compelling. But then I really don't believe MS set out to create an OS aimed at us. I believe they're just trying to catch up with the other OS's to make sure they don't get phased out over the next 10 years. They've obviously tried to make a secure OS that looks better than OS-X. Whether they've succeeded or not, time will tell. But as new PCs & laptops start shipping with Vista pre-installed, software developers will need to upgrade sooner or later if they want their apps to be compatible.
"For fifty bucks I'd put my face in their soup and blow." - George Costanza
~ Web SQL Utility - asp.net app to query Access, SQL server, MySQL. Stores history, favourites.
-
Not sure, but I've been reading that a lot of corporate customers are taking a second look at Linux because they perceive Vista as being such a major upgrade and so short on new features and value that it's time to see what else is out there. Apparently the perception is that Linux is a viable alternative now to windows for corporate settings. I'm definitely looking into the state of .net on linux when I get some free time. I'd love to port our main business app to Linux as an excercise in learning and if it's doable and not too time consuming release it and see what the percentage of sales there are for it.
I've got the first issue of the new MSCoder mag today and they mention DotGNU and Portable.NET. Don't know what it is yet and how it compares to Mono.NET, but you might want to google for it. It's kinda funny that MSCoder is the "independent magazine for developers using Microsoft platforms" and the first CD of the first issue is a Linux live CD. :-D
-
are these the same people who are voting down everyone who's unimpressed with Vista ?
No, that would be me, voting down the high-horse techno zealots. ;)
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: God-as-Judge, God-as-Forgiver The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
-
1. It's my PC, noone else to worry about. 2. U set the desktop to Win2k style, less bloated. 3. Games? Not me. In my case I'll stick to XP as long as possible. Maybe Vista's successor will be better. Elaine :rose:
Elaine, you didn't address the searching, the search folders, the better security? Ah well. I wonder, what did you think of XP when you were running Windows 98?
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: God-as-Judge, God-as-Forgiver The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
-
Judah Himango wrote:
Start menu that makes sense: every machine I go to, you click the Start->rograms and *booom!* the whole screen fills with program entries. Vista's new Start Menu solves this problem by making the menu a limited size with scrolling.
The option to choose between a multicolumn or a scrolling startmenu if you have alot of icons exists in XP. I don't recall where, but do remember having to switch from scrolling to multicolumn before. Other features that I've cooled over the descriptions of are per app volume control at the OS level. Mute the browser so embedded audio anoyances aren't heard. Double or tripple the volume on my DVD player so I don't blow my ear drums in switchig back to winamp after watching a movie. Delete in explorer reports undeletable files, but doesn't halt on the first error reported. Sound (and some other??) drivers moved out of the kernal so they won't bluescreen you when they crash. I'm not sure which version I'll get, but my fall07/spring08 PC will probably be running some version of it.
-- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.
Ah yes, I forgot about the driver changes; at least sound and video drivers are outside the kernel. And because of that, fewer blue screens (which are almost always due to bad drivers). :cool:
Tech, life, family, faith: Give me a visit. I'm currently blogging about: God-as-Judge, God-as-Forgiver The apostle Paul, modernly speaking: Epistles of Paul Judah Himango
-
Christopher Duncan wrote:
Neat & Groovy set of eye candy. Again, sexy for geeks, but no real tangible benefit.
I'm a nerd rather than a geek, and I don't like eye candy in my OS. Such things are not for nerds (and I doubt geeks want them either), they are for everyday users who don't know any better -- i.e. most of Microsoft's market share. I like icons and toolbars that are small, non-distracting, and customizable. I'm now running IE7 which I hear is a precursor to Vista, but I hate hate hate the oversized buttons and crap, I want a "classic" mode. I probably won't go to Vista. I did install the Beta 1 on a system which is now collecting dust in a closet. I hope Vista goes the way of ME, I'll wait for the next one.
PIEBALDconsult wrote:
I'm a nerd rather than a geek, and I don't like eye candy in my OS. Such things are not for nerds (and I doubt geeks want them either), they are for everyday users who don't know any better -- i.e. most of Microsoft's market share.
Speak for yourself! I love the UI enhancements. I think the XP look is cool and Vista is better, and I'm certainly not an "everyday user" as you put it...
Ryan
"Punctuality is only a virtue for those who aren't smart enough to think of good excuses for being late" John Nichol "Point Of Impact"
-
Not sure, but I've been reading that a lot of corporate customers are taking a second look at Linux because they perceive Vista as being such a major upgrade and so short on new features and value that it's time to see what else is out there. Apparently the perception is that Linux is a viable alternative now to windows for corporate settings. I'm definitely looking into the state of .net on linux when I get some free time. I'd love to port our main business app to Linux as an excercise in learning and if it's doable and not too time consuming release it and see what the percentage of sales there are for it.
John Cardinal wrote:
but I've been reading that a lot of corporate customers are taking a second look at Linux because they perceive Vista as being such a major upgrade and so short on new features and value that it's time to see what else is out there. Apparently the perception is that Linux is a viable alternative now to windows for corporate settings.
That's interesting. Microsoft puts out a product that is perceived as a major upgrade and no real new features and value. Soooo...Suddenly that puts it on par with shifting to Linux--it's a major, well, change, and the features/value should be equivalent. Interesting effect. A product upgrade that actually loses customers because they see it as an opportunity to finally jump ship. I can remember certain precedences in the past like that as well. For example, when MFC transitioned from 16 bit OS to 32 bit OS, a lot of it broke (IIRC). I decided that instead of investing into MFC all over again, I'd write my own layer around it so my applications wouldn't completely break, only the framework. Anyways. I'm with you. I'd like to play with linux and .net, but free time is definitely a difficult thing to find right now. What would be interesting would be to get a bunch of people together who all want to do this, and distribute tasks out to each and have them report on their tasks. I think this would make the whole process less daunting. Marc
People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith