... so I used an old bible I had been using for cigarette paper.
-
I did. You just missed it.
-
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
Finding humor in the mockery does not necessarily equate to supporting it.
Not only did you find it humorous, but you expressed your satisfaction with his statement and extended it by asking "which holy book have you found most gentle on your ass?", thereby demonstrating clear support.
Alvaro Mendez wrote:
You were also amused by his Koran mockery. Admit it.
No. I found it to be devoid of humor. I also believe that fruitless mockery of religion such as his (regardless of the religion) should be condemned. The point he proved was that the one person to voice support over religious mockery was you...an atheist.
Red Stateler wrote:
No. I found it to be devoid of humor. I also believe that fruitless mockery of religion such as his (regardless of the religion) should be condemned. The point he proved was that the one person to voice support over religious mockery was you...an atheist.
He didn't mock anything. Mocking is unflattering imitation. He simply showed his disrespect for a religious book with his toilet humor. I found it funny. You didn't (or so you claim). I wanted to keep laughing so I invited him to extend the joke. You got offended and decided to try to offend me in return. I gave you a silly response, and that was enough for you to delightfully declare that I had become offended. Then, being the compassionate conservative that you are, you offered an apology for presumably doing what you now claim should be condemned... May God forgive you. :rolleyes:
A casual stroll through the lunatic asylum shows that faith does not prove anything. - Friedrich Nietzsche
-
fat_boy wrote:
You stil think this is blasphemy in light of that video showing people being killed in the name of god?
From the Muslim perspective it is. Of course I'm blasphemous from their perspective too, but my blasphomy generally has a point.
Red Stateler wrote:
but my blasphomy generally has a point.
I like it! Thanks.
"When your argument falls apart...resort to name-calling."
Red Stateler aka (D)espeir in the SoapboxWhereas "liberal" is just a moron.
Red Stateler aka (D)espeir in the Soapboxtypical left-wing pseudo-intellectual crackpot
Red Stateler aka (D)espeir in the SoapboxActually you applied an incorrect and personal interpretation of "freedom"
Red Stateler aka (D)espeir in the SoapboxThat's why Muslims need to be absolutely destroyed.
Red Stateler aka (D)espeir in the Soapboxbut my blasphomy generally has a point.
Red Stateler aka (D)espeir in the Soapboxled mike
-
Smoking is bad for you. :)
-- Painstakingly Drawn Before a Live Audience
-
Thank you for proving my point. You are a model of Islamic tolerance.
I don't need any point to prove your haterd against Islam. Keep burning! preaching starts from home. Apply such tolerence example on your family members then you would sound better to preach others.
-
So you're saying that a boycott is as "extreme" as suicide bombing?
-
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
Actually I had been waiting for some instance on this forum to proove that non-believers are not less extreemist than believers/religious followers
At least, when we kill, we do not do it in the name of some fictious character.
-------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
MP(2) wrote: At least, when we kill, we do not do it in the name of some fictious character. Well, so who is fictious? One whose life and everything is more documented, unchanged and preserved or one whose teachings, life and everything is being changed to suit one's smalla nd big greeds?????
-
fat_boy wrote:
so I used an old bible I had been using for cigarette paper.
Well, it is OK but just be carefull: smoking is dangerous for health!!! :laugh::laugh::laugh:
-
fat_boy wrote:
Watch it Adnan, in the forums present state of mind you might get 5 votes.
Don't get me wrong. Adnan never deserves 5 votes. But you're taking the "Piss Christ" approach of criticism which offers nothing of real value...just a statement. Of course, that's probably your intent.
-
I also learnt about your ex-Religion. I assume you were a Bible follower. I could say that because you used the term 'toilet paper' for Koran and 'cigarette paper' for Bible. At one side you want to prove yourself a person who rejects all religion and on other hand you still have a soft corner for christianity/judaism and some day pope stan shannon could make you to accept bible again. I thankyou once again to give a proof that all of your anti-Religion thought is based on Islam only.
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
you used the term 'toilet paper' for Koran and 'cigarette paper' for Bible
No i didnt. I wrote that I was reading the Koran and ran out of toilet paper. So i went a got a bible that I had used for cigarette paper and used that to wipe my arse. I have just proved that you see what you want to see, not what I wrote.
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
I assume you were a Bible follower
By the way, I have never been a bible follower, i am not christained, baptised, or anything. I am a beer drinking pagan, raised by beer drinking pagans, living in a beer drinking pagan society.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
There have been riots resulting in many deaths in Africa and Asia in recent years (this side of the millenium) carried out by groups calling themselves Christians. I can't recall the names of the countries though to gather some links, but hopefully someone here will be able to help? Or how about the various genocides that have happened over the past 100 years? Don't forget, 96% of Rwandians were following the various flavours of Christianity before the 1994 genocide. More than half of them were devout Catholics. The Muslim population actually increased from 4% to 14% after the murdering had slowed because it was the Muslims in those communities who were giving shelter to the people being exterminated. And let's not forget all the Catholic vs. Protestant riots and the violence and deaths that resulted all throughout the last 50 years in Northern Island - they all called themselves Christians. (And those aren't including IRA actions.) Most of those have been over petty things like land or perceived provocation. If you really compiled the evidence that's out there, you could probably find a major example from every one of those past one hundred years.
Ðavid Wulff What kind of music to programmers listen to?
Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff
I, for one, welcome our new shrew-sized overlords.While what you state is true, it is a mistake to assume that because a particular group is of religion 'x' that their violence is attributable to that religion. The Hutu in Rwanda might well have been christians, but their violence towards the Tutu was inspired by tribal hatred. Same for Northern Ireland. Political hatred and 'racial' (I use that term loosely to mean dirrerent nations) hatred played a greater role. Islma however IS a motivator of violence. (In Shia Islam anyway) The idea of Jihad, sacrifice, death, religion, and god are intrinsicly intertwined in their society.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
Rob Graham wrote:
We don't kill those who blaspheme,
Because you're blasphemious yourself and don't need someone else but you guys get mad about *Evoluttion* =). Anyway I'm not in mood to make a search on google about examples of aethists' extreemism plus extreemist doesn't mean killing someone. The reaction of Fat and your IS extreemist but verbally because you can't kill me on this forum.
Rob Graham wrote:
Only Muslims are that intemperate and violent. Must be a weak faith that is so easily threatened.
I think your kids used to swear at you and your wife all the time in the name of Freedom of expression. I also believe that Stan's kids used to pee on his face like he showed pic of Jesus[AS] because It's all about tolerence? Better you bastards keep your filthy reasons to yourself.
Rob Graham wrote:
Must be a weak faith that is so easily threatened.
I don't care whether its a weaker faith or stronger. All I know It's spreading all over the world despite of infinite shit propagated by morons like you. deal with it!. As i said again that such *tacticts* are not doing anything harmful against us or Islam, such lame moves infact making non-muslims more curious to know further about Islam, they read about it and many accept it. The day you morons understand the nature of curiosity in humans then you would try your best to say anything crappy against Islam or muslims.
Adnan Siddiqi wrote:
I think your kids used to swear at you and your wife all the time in the name of Freedom of expression. I also believe that Stan's kids used to pee on his face like he showed pic of Jesus[AS] because It's all about tolerence?
You really are a blinkered idiot. I am sorry.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
Rob Graham wrote:
Only Muslims are that intemperate and violent
That is untrue. Violence from ultra-orthodox Jews may halt gay march in Jerusalem[^] Two homemade bombs found on the roof of a movie theater where ``The Last Temptation of Christ`` was playing [^] Hard-line Hindus, bent on stopping love-struck couples from celebrating Valentine's Day, went on a rampage...in many parts of the country, invading gift shops, burning cards and disrupting festivities[^]
Where do you expect us to go when the bombs fall?
-
MP(2) wrote: At least, when we kill, we do not do it in the name of some fictious character. Well, so who is fictious? One whose life and everything is more documented, unchanged and preserved or one whose teachings, life and everything is being changed to suit one's smalla nd big greeds?????
Ha ha! You assume he is stating Muhammed is fictitious while Christ isnt. What you dont understand is that a lot (most of) the west is unreligious or even atheistic. They are all fucking fictitious!
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
True, true. There are plenty of religious sickko arseholes all over the place.
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
-
Ha ha! You assume he is stating Muhammed is fictitious while Christ isnt. What you dont understand is that a lot (most of) the west is unreligious or even atheistic. They are all fucking fictitious!
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
I believe that Mohammad and Jesus existed (but I don't believe that the latter is the son of god, because there is no god). It is god that I think is fictious.
-------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
-
MP(2) wrote: At least, when we kill, we do not do it in the name of some fictious character. Well, so who is fictious? One whose life and everything is more documented, unchanged and preserved or one whose teachings, life and everything is being changed to suit one's smalla nd big greeds?????
What you say does not make sense at all.
Irshad Sulaimani wrote:
or one whose teachings, life and everything is being changed to suit one's smalla nd big greeds?????
This is no fiction, this is reality, whether it is good or not.
-------- "I say no to drugs, but they don't listen." - Marilyn Manson
-
Ha ha! You assume he is stating Muhammed is fictitious while Christ isnt. What you dont understand is that a lot (most of) the west is unreligious or even atheistic. They are all fucking fictitious!
Truth is the subjection of reality to an individuals perception
Sorry for misunderstanding. I simply believe that Mohammad(PBUH) as well as Jesus(PBUH) were the prophet of Allah. But it's up to an individual that he believes or not..... let's not try to demonise each other.....Seek the truth but better refrain from abusing and humiliating each other....Sorry if i hurt anyone....