Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Back Room
  4. The Muslims are coming, the Muslims are coming...

The Muslims are coming, the Muslims are coming...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Back Room
htmlcom
42 Posts 17 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

    You know, it could've been worse. It could've been an atheist! :rolleyes:

    -- Verletzen zerfetzen zersetzen zerstören Doch es darf nicht mir gehören Ich muss zerstören

    B Offline
    B Offline
    brianwelsch
    wrote on last edited by
    #13

    I think they make Atheists swear on the Origin of Species. :~

    BW


    If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
    -- Steven Wright

    D J 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • R Rob Graham

      Not just blacks, but *ghasp* women...

      M Offline
      M Offline
      marius_romanus
      wrote on last edited by
      #14

      Rob Graham wrote:

      but *ghasp* women...

      Not much longer, if the Quaran people start to take over ! :-) Marius

      --------------------------------------------------------- Complete freedom is a state without context ---------------------------------------------------------

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B brianwelsch

        I think they make Atheists swear on the Origin of Species. :~

        BW


        If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
        -- Steven Wright

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Dan Neely
        wrote on last edited by
        #15

        :rolleyes::rolleyes: Try the constitution.

        -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

        B 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • W Wjousts

          Man, how annoying are the intelliTXT pop ups on Fox's site?

          S Offline
          S Offline
          Sean Cundiff
          wrote on last edited by
          #16

          Wjousts wrote:

          how annoying are the intelliTXT pop ups

          very. try reading some of the CP articles that have intelliTXT popups X|

          -Sean ---- Shag a Lizard

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Dan Neely

            :rolleyes::rolleyes: Try the constitution.

            -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

            B Offline
            B Offline
            brianwelsch
            wrote on last edited by
            #17

            Ah, right. That would've been my second guess. :)

            BW


            If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
            -- Steven Wright

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B brianwelsch

              I think they make Atheists swear on the Origin of Species. :~

              BW


              If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate.
              -- Steven Wright

              J Offline
              J Offline
              Jorgen Sigvardsson
              wrote on last edited by
              #18

              I think an honest atheist would swear by his name. But I guess that doesn't count for the morally deficient people who need the constant threat from above to stay in check.

              -- Federal law prohibits changing the channel

              R V 2 Replies Last reply
              0
              • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                I think an honest atheist would swear by his name. But I guess that doesn't count for the morally deficient people who need the constant threat from above to stay in check.

                -- Federal law prohibits changing the channel

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Red Stateler
                wrote on last edited by
                #19

                Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

                I think an honest atheist would swear by his name

                So then an atheist holds himself in a higher regard than any other thing?

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Red Stateler

                  Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

                  I think an honest atheist would swear by his name

                  So then an atheist holds himself in a higher regard than any other thing?

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Jorgen Sigvardsson
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #20

                  Well, certainly higher than any irrational belief.

                  -- This Episode Has Been Modified To Fit Your Primitive Screen

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                    Well, certainly higher than any irrational belief.

                    -- This Episode Has Been Modified To Fit Your Primitive Screen

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Red Stateler
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #21

                    And you actually think that holding yourself in higher regard to any known thing isn't...irrational? Egomaniacal, maybe.

                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Red Stateler

                      And you actually think that holding yourself in higher regard to any known thing isn't...irrational? Egomaniacal, maybe.

                      J Offline
                      J Offline
                      Jorgen Sigvardsson
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #22

                      Having fun fighting straw men? Get lost. I don't have time for your silly and quite frankly boring games.

                      -- Featuring GRATUITOUS ALIEN NUDITY

                      R 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                        Having fun fighting straw men? Get lost. I don't have time for your silly and quite frankly boring games.

                        -- Featuring GRATUITOUS ALIEN NUDITY

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Red Stateler
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #23

                        Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

                        Having fun fighting straw men?

                        Ah yes...The ol' feigned fallacy to escape an argument. I asked a simple question. The point of taking an oath in the name of God is to do so with full confidence that (assuming you're faithful) you will carry out that oath as it's done in the witness of that thing held in the highest regard by God-fearing people. You claim that if an atheist were to swear an oath, he would do so to himself, thereby implying that he holds himself in higher regard than any other thing. Do you?

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                          I think an honest atheist would swear by his name. But I guess that doesn't count for the morally deficient people who need the constant threat from above to stay in check.

                          -- Federal law prohibits changing the channel

                          V Offline
                          V Offline
                          VonHagNDaz
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #24

                          Atheist could also pinky promise...

                          I win because I have the most fun in life...

                          D 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • W Wjousts

                            Man, how annoying are the intelliTXT pop ups on Fox's site?

                            E Offline
                            E Offline
                            ednrgc
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #25

                            They're there to distract you from the slanted "news"

                            W 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R Red Stateler

                              Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

                              Having fun fighting straw men?

                              Ah yes...The ol' feigned fallacy to escape an argument. I asked a simple question. The point of taking an oath in the name of God is to do so with full confidence that (assuming you're faithful) you will carry out that oath as it's done in the witness of that thing held in the highest regard by God-fearing people. You claim that if an atheist were to swear an oath, he would do so to himself, thereby implying that he holds himself in higher regard than any other thing. Do you?

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              Dan Neely
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #26

                              It's all Smoke and Mirrors. An honorable person will tell the truth regardless of what peice of paper they swear on, a dirtbag will tell lies regardless of what they swear on. The only thing thta might keep them in check is the threat of perjury charges.

                              -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

                              R 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Dan Neely

                                It's all Smoke and Mirrors. An honorable person will tell the truth regardless of what peice of paper they swear on, a dirtbag will tell lies regardless of what they swear on. The only thing thta might keep them in check is the threat of perjury charges.

                                -- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

                                R Offline
                                R Offline
                                Red Stateler
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #27

                                That's definately true. An oath is largely symbolic and completely dependent on the character of the person making it. But the purpose of swearing to God is to do so in witness of the thing you hold in higher regard than any other thing. So what would an atheist swear to? Himself (thereby holding himself in high regard)? Society (or the state)? "Reason" (or whatever frequently faulty interpretation of it)? What exactly does an atheist hold in higher regard than himself, if anything?

                                V L 2 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • V VonHagNDaz

                                  not nearly as bad as a Hispanic midget woman...

                                  I win because I have the most fun in life...

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  led mike
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #28

                                  VonHagNDaz wrote:

                                  not nearly as bad as a Hispanic midget woman...

                                  Well we already have a Giant Jackass in the whitehouse so a Hispanic midget women would be an improvment in the evolutionary sense.

                                  led mike

                                  V 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • R Red Stateler

                                    That's definately true. An oath is largely symbolic and completely dependent on the character of the person making it. But the purpose of swearing to God is to do so in witness of the thing you hold in higher regard than any other thing. So what would an atheist swear to? Himself (thereby holding himself in high regard)? Society (or the state)? "Reason" (or whatever frequently faulty interpretation of it)? What exactly does an atheist hold in higher regard than himself, if anything?

                                    V Offline
                                    V Offline
                                    VonHagNDaz
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #29

                                    Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.

                                    I win because I have the most fun in life...

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • L led mike

                                      VonHagNDaz wrote:

                                      not nearly as bad as a Hispanic midget woman...

                                      Well we already have a Giant Jackass in the whitehouse so a Hispanic midget women would be an improvment in the evolutionary sense.

                                      led mike

                                      V Offline
                                      V Offline
                                      VonHagNDaz
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #30

                                      what if they were Jewish as well, thats a bunch of minorities rolled into one...

                                      I win because I have the most fun in life...

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Red Stateler

                                        That's definately true. An oath is largely symbolic and completely dependent on the character of the person making it. But the purpose of swearing to God is to do so in witness of the thing you hold in higher regard than any other thing. So what would an atheist swear to? Himself (thereby holding himself in high regard)? Society (or the state)? "Reason" (or whatever frequently faulty interpretation of it)? What exactly does an atheist hold in higher regard than himself, if anything?

                                        L Offline
                                        L Offline
                                        led mike
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #31

                                        Red Stateler wrote:

                                        What exactly does an atheist hold in higher regard than himself

                                        Principles like honor and integrity, if he has them, just like a Religious person. When they don't have them then you get nothing but bullshit regardless of their so called religious affiliation.

                                        led mike

                                        R T 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • J Jorgen Sigvardsson

                                          You know, it could've been worse. It could've been an atheist! :rolleyes:

                                          -- Verletzen zerfetzen zersetzen zerstören Doch es darf nicht mir gehören Ich muss zerstören

                                          C Offline
                                          C Offline
                                          Chris Meech
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #32

                                          Joergen Sigvardsson wrote:

                                          It could've been an atheist!

                                          I don't believe that. :laugh:

                                          Chris Meech I am Canadian. [heard in a local bar] I agree with you that my argument is useless. [Red Stateler] Hey, I am part of a special bread, we are called smart people [Captain See Sharp] The zen of the soapbox is hard to attain...[Jörgen Sigvardsson] I wish I could remember what it was like to only have a short term memory.[David Kentley]

                                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups